Privatization and Competition in the Delivery of Local Services: An Empirical Examination of the Dual Market Hypothesis

This paper empirically analyses the hypothesis of the existence of a dual market for contracts in local services. Large firms that operate on a national basis control the contracts for delivery in the most populated and/or urban municipalities, whereas small firms that operate at a local level have the contracts in the least populated and/or rural municipalities. The dual market implies the high concentration and dominance of major firms in large municipalities, and local monopolies in the smaller ones. This market structure is harmful to competition for the market as the effective number of competitors is low across all municipalities. Thus, it damages the likelihood of obtaining cost savings from privatization.

[1]  M. Warner,et al.  Rural—Urban Differences in Privatization: Limits to the Competitive State , 2003 .

[2]  W. Niskanen.  Bureaucracy and representative government , 1971 .

[3]  Simon Domberger,et al.  Contracting out by the public sector: theory, evidence, prospects , 1997 .

[4]  Matthew Potoski,et al.  Managing contract performance: A transaction costs approach , 2003 .

[5]  John Vickers,et al.  Economic Perspectives on Privatization , 1991 .

[6]  S. Szymanski,et al.  The Impact of Compulsory Competitive Tendering on Refuse Collection Services , 1996 .

[7]  G. Bel,et al.  Comparison of Recent Toll Road Concession Transactions in the United States and France , 2007 .

[8]  S. Davies.  Politics and markets: the case of UK municipal waste management , 2007 .

[9]  E. Dijkgraaf,et al.  Fair competition in the refuse collection market? , 2007 .

[10]  Agustí Segarra-Blasco,et al.  Barriers to innovation and public policy in Catalonia , 2008 .

[11]  Laura Fernández-Villadangos.  Are Two-Part Tariffs Efficient When Consumers Plan Ahead?: An Empirical Study , 2006 .

[12]  Barbara J Stevens,et al.  Scale, Market Structure, and the Cost of Refuse Collection , 1978 .

[13]  José María Durán Cabré,et al.  An empirical analysis of wealth taxation: Equity vs. tax compliance , 2007 .

[14]  A Law of Large Numbers: Bidding and Compulsory Competitive Tendering for Refuse Collection Contracts , 2001 .

[15]  John Vickers,et al.  Privatization: An Economic Analysis , 1988 .

[16]  Simon Domberger,et al.  Competitive tendering and efficiency: the case of refuse collection , 1986 .

[17]  Christian Durán Weitkamp,et al.  Economic Effects of Road Accessibility in the Pyrenees: User Perspective , 2008 .

[18]  Elbert Dijkgraaf,et al.  Collusion in the Dutch waste collection market , 2005 .

[19]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Why Regulate Utilities , 1968 .

[20]  Jeffrey A. Dubin,et al.  How Markets for Impure Public Goods Organize: The Case of Household Refuse Collection , 1987 .

[21]  Mariam Camarero,et al.  New Evidence of the Real Interest Rate Parity for OECD Countries Using Panel Unit Root Tests with Breaks , 2006 .

[22]  E. Sclar.  YOU DON'T ALWAYS GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR. THE ECONOMICS OF PRIVATIZATION , 2000 .

[23]  O. Hart,et al.  The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons , 1996 .

[24]  Elbert Dijkgraaf,et al.  Cost Savings of Contracting Out Refuse Collection , 2005 .

[25]  Germà Bel,et al.  Do Public Sector Reforms Get Rusty? Local Privatization in Spain , 2006 .

[26]  Raul Ramos,et al.  Job Losses, Outsourcing and Relocation: Empirical Evidence Using Microdata , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[27]  Sean Wilkins,et al.  Cheap rubbish? Competitive tendering and contracting out in refuse collection, 1981-88 , 1993 .

[28]  Xavier Fageda,et al.  Reforming the local public sector: economics and politics in privatization of water and solid waste , 2008 .

[29]  Pere Castells,et al.  The Choice of Banking Firm: Are the Interest Rate a Significant Criteria? , 2006 .

[30]  G. Boyne.  Public Choice Theory and Local Government: A Comparative Analysis of the UK and the USA , 1998 .

[31]  Agustí Segarra-Blasco,et al.  Innovation, R&D Spillovers and Productivity: The Role of Knowledge-Intensive Services , 2007 .

[32]  Adriana Sánchez Hugalde.  INFLUENCIA DE LA INMIGRACIÓN EN LA ELECCIÓN ESCOLAR a , 2007 .

[33]  Dennis J. Snower,et al.  The macroeconomics of the labor market: three fundamental views , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[34]  Organizational Choices for Public Service Supply , 1994 .

[35]  J. R. Bara,et al.  Capital humano: un análisis comparativo Catalunya - España , 2006 .

[36]  Scott J. Callan,et al.  Economies of Scale and Scope: A Cost Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Services , 2001, Land Economics.

[37]  Factors explaining local privatization: a meta-regression analysis , 2009 .

[38]  Francesc Trillas,et al.  Productive Efficiency and Regulatory Reform: The Case of Vehicle Inspection Services , 2006 .

[39]  Mauro Mediavilla,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Public Subsidies on a Firm's Performance: A Quasi-Experimental Approach , 2007 .

[40]  Alexandrina Stoyanova,et al.  Changes in the demand for private medical insurance following a shift in tax incentives. , 2008, Health economics.

[41]  Germà Bel,et al.  GASTO MUNICIPAL POR EL SERVICIO DE RESIDUOS SÓLIDOS URBANOS , 2006 .

[42]  Anna Matas,et al.  Car Ownership and Access to Jobs in Spain , 2008 .

[43]  Xavier Fageda,et al.  Why do local governments privatise public services? A survey of empirical studies , 2007 .

[44]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  Optimal Size in the Waste Collection Sector , 2002 .

[45]  R. Bivand,et al.  Modelling the spatial impact of the introduction of Compulsory Competitive Tendering , 2000 .

[46]  Luis Diaz-Serrano,et al.  The Causal Relationship between Individual’S Choice Behavior and Self-Reported Satisfaction: The Case of Residential Mobility in the EU , 2008 .

[47]  J. Wortis,et al.  Privatization , 1988, Biological Psychiatry.

[48]  E. Savas,et al.  Privatization: The Key to Better Government , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[49]  Steven Tadelis,et al.  Contracting for Government Services: Theory and Evidence from U.S. Cities , 2007 .

[50]  J. Donahue.  The Privatization Decision: Public Ends, Private Means , 1991 .