Analyzing the Centralised Use of Multiple Social Media by Government from Innovations Diffusion Theory Perspective

Governments have started increasingly using web 2.0 social media as a new channel of interaction with citizens in various phases of public policies lifecycle. In this direction they have started moving from simpler forms of exploitation of these strong bi-directional communication channels to more complex and sophisticated ones. These attempts constitute important innovations for government agencies, so it is necessary to analyse them from this perspective as well. This paper analyzes an advanced form of centralised use of multiple social media by government agencies from this perspective, using the well established Diffusion of Innovations Theory of Rogers. It is based on a pilot application of the above approach for conducting a consultation campaign in multiple social media concerning the large scale application of a telemedicine program of the Piedmont Regional Government, Italy. It has been concluded that this approach has the fundamental preconditions for a wide diffusion (relative advantage, compatibility with existing values and processes, reasonable complexity, trialability and observability), at least in government organizations having a tradition of bi-directional communication with citizens in all phases of policy making, and also some experience in using social media for this purpose.

[1]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[2]  Michael J. Magro A Review of Social Media Use in E-Government , 2012 .

[3]  John T. Snead Social media use in the U.S. Executive branch , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  J. Grimes,et al.  Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e‐government , 2012 .

[5]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  Social Media Technology and Government Transparency , 2010, Computer.

[6]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  A Review of Opinion Mining Methods for Analyzing Citizens' Contributions in Public Policy Debate , 2011, ePart.

[7]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[8]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0 , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[9]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Social media in government , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  Y. Charalabidis,et al.  Towards a Rationalisation of Social Media Exploitation in Government Policy-Making Processes , 2012 .

[11]  Daren C. Brabham Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving , 2008 .

[12]  Arnim Bleier,et al.  Engaging Politicians with Citizens on Social Networking Sites: The WeGov Toolbox , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[13]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Participative Public Policy Making Through Multiple Social Media Platforms Utilization , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[14]  Daniel Lathrop,et al.  Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice , 2010 .

[15]  Luis F. Luna-Reyes,et al.  Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  Researching Business and Management , 2005 .

[17]  Ibrahim M. Al-Jabri,et al.  Mobile Banking Adoption: Application of Diffusion of Innovation Theory , 2012 .

[18]  Christoph Ihl,et al.  Citizensourcing: Applying the Concept of Open Innovation to the Public Sector , 2010 .

[19]  David Osimo Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How? , 2008 .

[20]  V. Frissen,et al.  Public Services 2.0: The Impact of Social Computing on Public Services , 2010 .

[21]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  James Surowiecki The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[23]  T. Bovaird Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services , 2007 .

[24]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  Jarunee Wonglimpiyarat,et al.  In support of innovation management and Roger's Innovation Diffusion theory , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  F. Schiavone,et al.  Limits to the diffusion of innovation: A literature review and integrative model , 2010 .

[27]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Public Policy Formulation through Non Moderated Crowdsourcing in Social Media , 2012, ePart.

[28]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[29]  Barbara Flügge,et al.  Electronic customs innovation: An improvement of governmental infrastructures , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[30]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  ENHANCING PARTICIPATIVE POLICY MAKING THROUGH MODELLING AND SIMULATION: A STATE OF THE ART REVIEW , 2012 .

[31]  Diomidis Spinellis,et al.  Barriers to the Adoption of B2B e-Marketplaces by Large Enterprises: Lessons Learned From the Hellenic Aerospace Industry , 2011, Inf. Syst. Manag..