Do safety performance functions used for predicting crash frequency vary across space? Applying geographically weighted regressions to account for spatial heterogeneity.

Safety Performance Functions (SPFs) provide a basis for identifying locations where countermeasures can be effective. While SPFs in the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) were calibrated based on data from select states, calibration factors can be developed to localize SPFs to other states. Calibration factors typically provide a coarse adjustment-time and space stationarity of associations between crash frequencies and various factors is still assumed, implying that the SPF functional form is transferable. However, with increasing availability of statewide geo-referenced safety data, new spatial analysis methods, and increasing computational power, it is possible to relax the stationarity assumption. Specifically, to address spatial heterogeneity in SPFs, this study proposes relaxing SPFs (referring to them as Localized SPFs (L-SPFs)) that can be developed by using sophisticated geo-spatial modeling techniques that allow correlates of crash frequencies to vary in space. For demonstration, a 2013 geo-referenced freeway crash and traffic database from Virginia is used. As a potential methodological alternative, crash frequencies are predicted by estimating Geographically Weighted Negative Binomial Regressions. This model significantly outperforms the traditional negative binomial model in terms of model goodness-of-fit, providing a better and fuller understanding of spatial variations in modeled relationships. Our study results uncover significant spatial variations in parameter estimates for Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) and segment length. Ignoring such variations can result in prediction errors. The results indicate low transferability of a single statewide SPF highlighting the importance of developing L-SPFs. From a practical standpoint, L-SPFs can better predict crash frequencies and support prioritizing safety improvements in specific locations.

[1]  H. Bozdogan.  Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions , 1987 .

[2]  Srinivas Reddy Geedipally,et al.  Sample-size guidelines for recalibrating crash prediction models: Recommendations for the highway safety manual. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson,et al.  Model of Relationship between Interstate Crash Occurrence and Geometrics , 2011 .

[4]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  How big data serves for freight safety management at highway-rail grade crossings? A spatial approach fused with path analysis , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[5]  Huaguo Zhou,et al.  Develop Calibration Factors for Crash Prediction Models for Rural Two-Lane Roadways in Illinois , 2012 .

[6]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  Improving Transferability of Safety Performance Functions by Bayesian Model Averaging , 2012 .

[7]  Chris Brunsdon,et al.  Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships , 2002 .

[8]  M. Quddus.  Modelling area-wide count outcomes with spatial correlation and heterogeneity: an analysis of London crash data. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Asad J Khattak,et al.  Gate-violation behavior at highway-rail grade crossings and the consequences: Using geo-Spatial modeling integrated with path analysis. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Marcelino Aurélio Vieira da Silva,et al.  Analysis of the Difference between the Euclidean Distance and the Actual Road Distance in Brazil , 2014 .

[11]  S. Washington,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis , 2010 .

[12]  Helai Huang,et al.  County-Level Crash Risk Analysis in Florida: Bayesian Spatial Modeling , 2010 .

[13]  Priyanka Alluri,et al.  Developing local safety performance functions versus calculating calibration factors for SafetyAnalyst applications: a Florida case study , 2014 .

[14]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives , 2010 .

[15]  Xiaoduan Sun,et al.  Application of "Highway Safety Manual" Draft Chapter: Louisiana Experience , 2006 .

[16]  Fei Xie.  Calibrating the highway safety manual predictive methods for Oregon rural state highways , 2011 .

[17]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  Using the Rural Two-Lane Highway Draft Prototype Chapter , 2006 .

[18]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  What are the differences in driver injury outcomes at highway-rail grade crossings? Untangling the role of pre-crash behaviors. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  John N. Ivan,et al.  Developing Safety Performance Function for Freeways by considering Interactions between Speed Limit and Geometric Variables , 2014 .

[20]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The relationship among highway geometrics, traffic-related elements and motor-vehicle accident frequencies , 1998 .

[21]  Jing Li,et al.  Safety Performance Function Development for Analysis of Bridges , 2015 .

[22]  Meng Zhang,et al.  What Role Do Precrash Driver Actions Play in Work Zone Crashes?:Application of Hierarchical Models to Crash Data , 2016 .

[23]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Exploring the transferability of safety performance functions. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Analytic methods in accident research: Methodological frontier and future directions , 2014 .

[25]  Kevin A. Henry,et al.  A Nationwide Comparison of Driving Distance Versus Straight-Line Distance to Hospitals , 2012, The Professional geographer : the journal of the Association of American Geographers.

[26]  Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson,et al.  Spatial regression analysis of traffic crashes in Seoul. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Accident prediction models with random corridor parameters. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Transferability and Calibration of Highway Safety Manual Performance Functions and Development of New Models for Urban Four-Lane Divided Roads in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia , 2015 .

[29]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Unobserved heterogeneity and the statistical analysis of highway accident data , 2016 .

[30]  Peter Y. Park,et al.  Benefits of small municipalities using jurisdiction-specific safety performance functions rather than the Highway Safety Manual's calibrated or uncalibrated safety performance functions , 2013 .

[31]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Non-Crossing Rail-Trespassing Crashes in the Past Decade: A Spatial Approach to Analyzing Injury Severity , 2016 .

[32]  Fred L Mannering,et al.  A note on modeling vehicle accident frequencies with random-parameters count models. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  Mitsuru Saito,et al.  Calibration of Highway Safety Manual Safety Performance Function , 2012 .

[34]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Modeling Traffic Incident Duration Using Quantile Regression , 2016 .

[35]  Pengpeng Xu,et al.  Modeling crash spatial heterogeneity: random parameter versus geographically weighting. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[36]  Praveen Edara,et al.  Calibration of the Highway Safety Manual for Missouri , 2013 .