Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the long-term efficacy of a school-based approach to drug abuse prevention. DESIGN Randomized trial involving 56 public schools that received the prevention program with annual provider training workshops and ongoing consultation, the prevention program with videotaped training and no consultation, or "treatment as usual" (ie, controls). Follow-up data were collected 6 years after baseline using school, telephone, and mailed surveys. PARTICIPANTS A total of 3597 predominantly white, 12th-grade students who represented 60.41% of the initial seventh-grade sample. INTERVENTION Consisted of 15 classes in seventh grade, 10 booster sessions in eighth grade, and five booster sessions in ninth grade, and taught general "life skills" and skills for resisting social influences to use drugs. MEASURES Six tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use self-report scales were recorded to create nine dichotomous drug use outcome variables and eight polydrug use variables. RESULTS Significant reductions in both drug and polydrug use were found for the two groups that received the prevention program relative to controls. The strongest effects were produced for individuals who received a reasonably complete version of the intervention--there were up to 44% fewer drug users and 66% fewer polydrug (tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana) users. CONCLUSIONS Drug abuse prevention programs conducted during junior high school can produce meaningful and durable reductions in tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use if they (1) teach a combination of social resistance skills and general life skills, (2) are properly implemented, and (3) include at least 2 years of booster sessions.

[1]  G. Botvin,et al.  School-based substance use prevention programs: why do effects decay? , 1993, Preventive medicine.

[2]  R M Bell,et al.  Preventing adolescent drug use: long-term results of a junior high program. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[3]  Michael W. Arthur,et al.  Panel attrition and external validity in adolescent substance use research. , 1992, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[4]  G. Botvin,et al.  Adolescent Tobacco, Alcohol, and Drug Abuse: Prevention Strategies, Empirical Findings, and Assessment Issues , 1992, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[5]  G. Botvin,et al.  Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal cognitive-behavioral approach: results of a 3-year study. , 1990, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[6]  G. Botvin,et al.  A psychosocial approach to smoking prevention for urban black youth. , 1989, Public health reports.

[7]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Estimating intervention effects in longitudinal studies. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[8]  B. Flay,et al.  Six-year follow-up of the first Waterloo school smoking prevention trial. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[9]  P. Hannan,et al.  Analysis Issues in School-Based Health Promotion Studies , 1989, Health education quarterly.

[10]  G. Botvin,et al.  Psychosocial approaches to substance abuse prevention: theoretical foundations and empirical findings. , 1989, Crisis.

[11]  G. Botvin,et al.  School-based smoking prevention: the teacher training process. , 1989, Preventive medicine.

[12]  Robert L. Bangert-Drowns,et al.  The Effects of School-Based Substance Abuse Education — A Meta-Analysis , 1988, Journal of drug education.

[13]  G. Botvin Substance abuse prevention research: recent developments and future directions. , 1986, The Journal of school health.

[14]  N. Tobler,et al.  Meta-Analysis of 143 Adolescent Drug Prevention Programs: Quantitative Outcome Results of Program Participants Compared to a Control or Comparison Group , 1986 .

[15]  J. Allegrante,et al.  Adolescents' Self-Reports of Tobacco, Alcohol, and Marijuana use: Examining the Comparability of Video Tape, Cartoon and Verbal Bogus-Pipeline Procedures , 1984, Psychological reports.

[16]  C. Perry,et al.  Pilot study of smoking, alcohol and drug abuse prevention. , 1980, American journal of public health.

[17]  M. Mittelmark,et al.  Increasing the validity of self-reports of behavior in a smoking in children investigation. , 1977 .

[18]  Seymour Geisser,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1963 .

[19]  G. Botvin,et al.  Smoking prevention among urban minority youth: assessing effects on outcome and mediating variables. , 1992, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[20]  G. Botvin,et al.  A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: one-year follow-up. , 1990, Addictive behaviors.

[21]  D M Murray,et al.  Planning for the appropriate analysis in school-based drug-use prevention studies. , 1990, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[22]  R M Bell,et al.  Drug prevention in junior high: a multi-site longitudinal test. , 1990, Science.

[23]  G. Botvin,et al.  Preventing Adolescent Substance Abuse Through Life Skills Training. , 1988 .

[24]  A. Biglan,et al.  Methodological issues in research on smoking prevention. , 1985, NIDA research monograph.

[25]  B R Flay,et al.  Psychosocial approaches to smoking prevention: a review of findings. , 1985, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[26]  G. Koch,et al.  Validity of self-reports of adolescent cigarette smoking. , 1982, The International journal of the addictions.

[27]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .