Reconstruction of correlated brain activity with adaptive spatial filters in MEG

Adaptive spatial filters (beamformers) have gained popularity as an effective method for the localization of brain activity from magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. Among the attractive features of some beamforming methods are high spatial resolution and no localization bias even in the presence of random noise. A drawback common to all beamforming methods, however, is significant degradation in performance in the presence of sources with high temporal correlations. Using numerical simulations and examples of auditory and visual evoked field responses, we demonstrate that, at typical signal-to-noise levels, the complete attenuation of fully correlated brain activity is less likely to occur, although significant localization and amplitude biases may occur. We compared various methods for correcting these biases and found the coherent source suppression model (CSSM) (Dalal et al., 2006) to be the most effective, with small biases for widely separated sources (e.g., bilateral auditory areas), however, amplitude biases increased systematically as distance between the sources was decreased. We assessed the performance and systematic biases that may result from the use of this model, and confirmed our findings with real examples of correlated brain activity in bilateral occipital and inferior temporal areas evoked by visually presented faces in a group of 21 adults. We demonstrated the ability to localize source activity in both regions, including correlated sources that are in close proximity ( approximately 3 cm) in bilateral primary visual cortex when using a priori information regarding source location. We conclude that CSSM, when carefully applied, can significantly improve localization accuracy, although amplitude biases may remain.

[1]  J Gross,et al.  REPRINTS , 1962, The Lancet.

[2]  G. Borgiotti,et al.  Superresolution of uncorrelated interference sources by using adaptive array techniques , 1979 .

[3]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[4]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Modified beamformers for coherent source region suppression , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  G. Barnes,et al.  Assessing interactions of linear and nonlinear neuronal sources using MEG beamformers: a proof of concept , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction , 2005, NeuroImage.

[7]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  David Poeppel,et al.  Reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources using an MEG vector beamformer technique , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  David Poeppel,et al.  Performance of an MEG adaptive-beamformer technique in the presence of correlated neural activities: effects on signal intensity and time-course estimates , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  D. Cheyne,et al.  Spatiotemporal mapping of cortical activity accompanying voluntary movements using an event‐related beamforming approach , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Shannon D. Blunt,et al.  Spatio–Temporal Reconstruction of Bilateral Auditory Steady-State Responses Using MEG Beamformers , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  M-X Huang,et al.  Commonalities and Differences Among Vectorized Beamformers in Electromagnetic Source Imaging , 2003, Brain Topography.

[13]  Se Robinson,et al.  Functional neuroimaging by Synthetic Aperture Magnetometry (SAM) , 1999 .

[14]  Wilkin Chau,et al.  Determination of activation areas in the human auditory cortex by means of synthetic aperture magnetometry , 2003, NeuroImage.

[15]  Elizabeth W. Pang,et al.  Event-related beamforming: A robust method for presurgical functional mapping using MEG , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  R. Greenblatt,et al.  Local linear estimators for the bioelectromagnetic inverse problem , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  関原 謙介,et al.  Adaptive Spatial Filters for Electromagnetic Brain Imaging , 2008 .

[18]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Optimising experimental design for MEG beamformer imaging , 2008, NeuroImage.

[19]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Global optimization in the localization of neuromagnetic sources , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Michael D. Zoltowski,et al.  On the performance analysis of the MVDR beamformer in the presence of correlated interference , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[21]  David Poeppel,et al.  Application of an MEG eigenspace beamformer to reconstructing spatio‐temporal activities of neural sources , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[22]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Beamformer reconstruction of correlated sources using a modified source model , 2007, NeuroImage.

[23]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[24]  R. Leahy,et al.  On MEG forward modelling using multipolar expansions. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Adaptive beamforming for coherent signals and interference , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[26]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  Signal cancellation phenomena in adaptive antennas: Causes and cures , 1982 .

[27]  Robinson Se,et al.  Localization of event-related activity by SAM(erf). , 2004 .

[28]  T. Yoshimoto,et al.  Recent Advances in Biomagnetism , 2007 .

[29]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Performance analysis of the optimum beamformer in the presence of correlated sources and its behavior under spatial smoothing , 1987, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..