Long-term effect of rehabilitation in coronary artery disease patients: randomized clinical trial of the impact of exercise volume

Objective: To assess whether exercise volume during phase II rehabilitation affects long-term clinical benefits in patients with coronary artery disease. Design: Prospective randomized clinical trial with long-term follow-up. Setting: Hospital outpatient clinic. Subjects: Coronary artery disease patients (age 65 ± 9 years, 82% males) attending a phase II rehabilitation programme were randomized into two groups of exercise volumes: 40- versus 60-minute training sessions. Patients exercised for three days per week for seven weeks, at 65% of baseline oxygen uptake capacity. Next, they were followed up for 18 months. Out of 165 patients with coronary artery disease who completed the exercise intervention, 119 attended the 18-month follow-up assessment. Main measurements: Body anthropometrics, resting haemodynamics, blood lipid profile, glycaemia, and C-reactive protein level, smoking behaviour, habitual physical activity, cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality. Results: In total population, a significant worsening of various cardiovascular disease risk factors was found at 18 months follow-up (P<0.05), and few patients (27% of total group) adhered to the recommended minimal physical activity level. No difference in change of body anthropometrics, resting haemodynamics, blood lipid profile, glycaemia, and C-reactive protein level, and smoking behaviour was seen between different exercise volumes (P>0.05). In addition, total cardiovascular disease incidence (13% versus 22% in 40- versus 60-minute group, respectively) and habitual physical activity were not different between groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: In patients with coronary artery disease following cardiac rehabilitation, the cardiovascular disease risk profile worsened significantly during long-term follow-up. A smaller exercise volume during phase II rehabilitation generated equal long-term clinical benefits compared to a greater exercise volume.

[1]  A. Amery,et al.  Prognostic value of training-induced change in peak exercise capacity in patients with myocardial infarcts and patients with coronary bypass surgery. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  A. Zwisler,et al.  Use of intensified comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation to improve risk factor control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance--the randomized DANish StUdy of impaired glucose metabolism in the settings of cardiac rehabilitation (DANSUK) study. , 2007, American heart journal.

[3]  S. Willich,et al.  Cardiac risk factors, medication, and recurrent clinical events after acute coronary disease; a prospective cohort study. , 2001, European heart journal.

[4]  J. Spinelli,et al.  The Extensive Lifestyle Management Intervention (ELMI) following cardiac rehabilitation trial. , 2003, European heart journal.

[5]  V F Froelicher,et al.  Exercise standards for testing and training: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. , 2001, Circulation.

[6]  K. Courneya,et al.  Determinants of physical activity after hospitalization for coronary artery disease: the Tracking Exercise After Cardiac Hospitalization (TEACH) Study , 2006, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[7]  Richard J. Snow,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation is associated with an improvement in C-reactive protein levels in both men and women with cardiovascular disease. , 2005, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.

[8]  B. Hedbäck,et al.  Cardiac Rehabilitation after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: 10-Year Results on Mortality, Morbidity and Readmissions to Hospital , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular risk.

[9]  G. Eide,et al.  Improving outcomes after myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial evaluating effects of a telephone follow-up intervention , 2007, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[10]  Andreas Hoffmann,et al.  Comparative outcome one year after formal cardiac rehabilitation: the effects of a randomized intervention to improve exercise adherence , 2008, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[11]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Global secondary prevention strategies to limit event recurrence after myocardial infarction: results of the GOSPEL study, a multicenter, randomized controlled trial from the Italian Cardiac Rehabilitation Network. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[14]  A. Tavassoli,et al.  Changes in lipid profile of patients referred to a cardiac rehabilitation program , 2008, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[15]  L. Rydén,et al.  Long-term effects of lifestyle behavior change in coronary artery disease: effects on recurrent coronary events after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[16]  R. Meeusen,et al.  Importance of exercise training session duration in the rehabilitation of coronary artery disease patients , 2008, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[17]  J. Berger,et al.  Cardiac Rehabilitation Reduces the Rate of Major Adverse Cardiac Events after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2005, European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing.

[18]  R. Belardinelli,et al.  Exercise training intervention after coronary angioplasty: the ETICA trial. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Shirley M. Moore,et al.  Effects of a CHANGE intervention to increase exercise maintenance following cardiac events , 2006, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[20]  F. Ridocci,et al.  Action to improve secondary prevention in coronary heart disease patients: one-year follow-up of a shared care programme1Presented in part at the XIVth World Congress of Cardiology, May 2002, Sydney, Australia. , 2004 .

[21]  C. Lavie,et al.  The effects of body composition changes to observed improvements in cardiopulmonary parameters after exercise training with cardiac rehabilitation. , 1998, Chest.

[22]  R. Meeusen,et al.  Rehabilitation in Cardiac Patients , 2005, Sports medicine.