Years of Wireless Ad Hoc Networking Research : What about Humanitarian and Disaster Relief Solutions ? What are we still missing ?

In the event of a disaster, the communication infrastructure can be partially or totally destroyed, or rendered unavailable due to high congestion. However, during such crisis situations, there is an acute need for information exchange for both rescue organizations and victims. Temporary communication solutions are thus of utmost importance until the infrastructure is restored. In this paper, we start by reviewing communication solutions – stemming from 30 years of research on ad hoc, mesh and delaytolerant networks – able to uphold communications during disasters when the communication infrastructure is destroyed, overloaded or not existing in the first place. We present how these solutions can be applied and summarize the advantages and disadvantages of each unique approach. In a second part, we present, Twimight, a Twitter application relying on delay-tolerant opportunistic communications to spread tweets and sensor data in an epidemic fashion. Twimight is an open source Twitter client for Android phones featured with a “disaster mode”, which users enable upon losing connectivity. In the disaster mode, tweets are not sent to the Twitter server but stored on the phone, carried around as people move, and forwarded opportunistically when in proximity with other phones. Eventually, we demonstrate how opportunistic technologies such as Twimight can be of great value right after a disaster by enabling the self-organization of victims and a better coordination with first rescue organizations. We discuss the main challenges to overcome and provide directions for future research both non-technical (e.g. user adoption of technology) and technical (e.g. security and data privacy).

[1]  Joseph Mitola,et al.  The software radio architecture , 1995, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[2]  Kevin R. Fall,et al.  A delay-tolerant network architecture for challenged internets , 2003, SIGCOMM '03.

[3]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Wireless mesh networks: a survey , 2005, Comput. Networks.

[4]  Ramesh R. Rao,et al.  Challenges in Using of Distributed Wireless Mesh Networks in Emergency Response , 2006 .

[5]  Lakshminarayanan Subramanian,et al.  Packet Loss Characterization in WiFi-Based Long Distance Networks , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[6]  Kun-Chan Lan,et al.  A Survey of Opportunistic Networks , 2008, 22nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications - Workshops (aina workshops 2008).

[7]  Marta C. González,et al.  Understanding spatial connectivity of individuals with non-uniform population density , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  Eric A. Brewer,et al.  JaldiMAC: taking the distance further , 2010, NSDR '10.

[9]  Eric A. Brewer,et al.  The village base station , 2010, NSDR '10.

[10]  Paul Gardner-Stephen,et al.  The Serval Project: Practical Wireless Ad-Hoc Mobile Telecommunications , 2011 .

[11]  Dominik Schatzmann,et al.  Twitter in disaster mode: security architecture , 2011, SWID '11.

[12]  Santosh S. Vempala,et al.  LifeNet: a flexible ad hoc networking solution for transient environments , 2011, SIGCOMM.

[13]  Yan Yang,et al.  A Survey of Routing Protocols and Simulations in Delay-Tolerant Networks , 2011, WASA.

[14]  Dominik Schatzmann,et al.  WiFi-Opp: ad-hoc-less opportunistic networking , 2011, CHANTS '11.

[15]  Jeffrey Huang,et al.  Human-Centered Design for Development , 2011, Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  Theus Hossmann,et al.  Twitter in disaster mode: opportunistic communication and distribution of sensor data in emergencies , 2011 .