A chemical EOR benchmark study of different reservoir simulators

Interest in chemical EOR processes has intensified in recent years due to the advancements in chemical formulations and injection techniques. Injecting Polymer (P), surfactant/polymer (SP), and alkaline/surfactant/polymer (ASP) are techniques for improving sweep and displacement efficiencies with the aim of improving oil production in both secondary and tertiary floods. There has been great interest in chemical flooding recently for different challenging situations. These include high temperature reservoirs, formations with extreme salinity and hardness, naturally fractured carbonates, and sandstone reservoirs with heavy and viscous crude oils.More oil reservoirs are reaching maturity where secondary polymer floods and tertiary surfactant methods have become increasingly important. This significance has added to the industry's interest in using reservoir simulators as tools for reservoir evaluation and management to minimize costs and increase the process efficiency. Reservoir simulators with special features are needed to represent coupled chemical and physical processes present in chemical EOR processes. The simulators need to be first validated against well controlled lab and pilot scale experiments to reliably predict the full field implementations.The available data from laboratory scale include 1) phase behavior and rheological data; and 2) results of secondary and tertiary coreflood experiments for P, SP, and ASP floods under reservoir conditions, i.e. chemical retentions, pressure drop, and oil recovery. Data collected from corefloods are used as benchmark tests comparing numerical reservoir simulators with chemical EOR modeling capabilities such as STARS of CMG, ECLIPSE-100 of Schlumberger, REVEAL of Petroleum Experts. The research UTCHEM simulator from The University of Texas at Austin is also included since it has been the benchmark for chemical flooding simulation for over 25 years.The results of this benchmark comparison will be utilized to improve chemical design for field-scale studies using commercial simulators. The benchmark tests illustrate the potential of commercial simulators for chemical flooding projects and provide a comprehensive table of strengths and limitations of each simulator for a given chemical EOR process. Mechanistic simulations of chemical EOR processes will provide predictive capability and can aid in optimization of the field injection projects. The objective of this paper is not to compare the computational efficiency and solution algorithms; it only focuses on the process modeling comparison. Careful selection of tables in the commercial simulators against UTCHEM is crucial.Data collected from corefloods are used as benchmark tests.The results of benchmark comparison will be utilized to improve chemical design.The simulation comparison can be used for field-scale studies.

[1]  G. Pope,et al.  Identification and Evaluation of High-Performance EOR Surfactants , 2009 .

[2]  G. Pope,et al.  Measurement of Microemulsion Viscosity and Its Implications for Chemical EOR , 2016 .

[3]  Kenneth Stuart Sorbie,et al.  Polymer-improved oil recovery , 1991 .

[4]  R. L. Reed,et al.  Physsicochemical Aspects of Microemulsion Flooding , 1974 .

[5]  Tohru Satoh.  Treatment of Phase Behavior and Associated Properties Used in a Micellar-Polymer Flood Simulator , 1984 .

[6]  Do Hoon Kim,et al.  Enhanced oil recovery from high-temperature, high-salinity naturally fractured carbonate reservoirs by surfactant flood , 2014 .

[7]  G. Pope,et al.  Modeling wettability alteration in naturally fractured reservoirs , 2006 .

[8]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  Surfactant oil recovery in fractured carbonates: Experiments and modeling of different matrix dimensions , 2015 .

[9]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  A Four-Phase Chemical/Gas Model in an Implicit-Pressure/Explicit-Concentration Reservoir Simulator , 2016 .

[10]  K. Sepehrnoori,et al.  Impact of Matrix Block Size on Oil Recovery Response Using Surfactants in Fractured Carbonates , 2012 .

[11]  K. Sepehrnoori,et al.  Modeling of Low-Tension Surfactant-Gas Flooding Process in a Four-Phase Flow Simulator , 2015 .

[12]  Chun Huh,et al.  Interfacial tensions and solubilizing ability of a microemulsion phase that coexists with oil and brine , 1979 .

[13]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  A Critical Assessment of Several Reservoir Simulators for Modeling Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery Processes , 2013, ANSS 2013.

[14]  E. Fahmy,et al.  Factors Influencing the Recovery of Petroleum from Unconsolidated Sands by Waterflooding , 1927 .

[15]  G. Pope,et al.  Development of thermally and chemically stable large-hydrophobe alkoxy carboxylate surfactants , 2012 .

[16]  A. B. Dasgupta.  Improved Oil Recovery , 2001 .

[17]  Do Hoon Kim,et al.  Novel large-hydrophobe alkoxy carboxylate surfactants for enhanced oil recovery , 2012 .

[18]  Donald M. Meter.  Tube flow of non-Newtonian polymer solutions: Part II. Turbulent flow , 1964 .

[19]  M. Delshad,et al.  Observations of Microemulsion Viscosity for Surfactant EOR Processes , 2016 .

[20]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  Coupling IPhreeqc with UTCHEM to model reactive flow and transport , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[21]  H. Darabi,et al.  Modeling of Wettability Alteration Due to Asphaltene Deposition in Oil Reservoirs , 2012 .

[22]  D. W. Corbishley,et al.  Design of an ASP Pilot for the Mangala Field: Laboratory Evaluations and Simulation Studies , 2008 .

[23]  L. Lake,et al.  Enhanced Oil Recovery , 2017 .

[24]  Moslem Taghavifar.  Enhanced heavy oil recovery by hybrid thermal-chemical processes , 2014 .

[25]  S. Jouenne,et al.  Polymer Injection in Deep Offshore Field: The Dalia Angola Case , 2008 .

[26]  Gary A. Pope,et al.  Mechanistic Interpretation and Utilization of Viscoelastic Behavior of Polymer Solutions for Improved Polymer-Flood Efficiency , 2008 .

[27]  Do Hoon Kim,et al.  New correlation to predict the optimum surfactant structure for EOR , 2012 .