Generation and validation of homozygous fluorescent knock-in cells using CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing

Gene tagging with fluorescent proteins is essential for investigations of the dynamic properties of cellular proteins. CRISPR-Cas9 technology is a powerful tool for inserting fluorescent markers into all alleles of the gene of interest (GOI) and allows functionality and physiological expression of the fusion protein. It is essential to evaluate such genome-edited cell lines carefully in order to preclude off-target effects caused by (i) incorrect insertion of the fluorescent protein, (ii) perturbation of the fusion protein by the fluorescent proteins or (iii) nonspecific genomic DNA damage by CRISPR-Cas9. In this protocol, we provide a step-by-step description of our systematic pipeline to generate and validate homozygous fluorescent knock-in cell lines.We have used the paired Cas9D10A nickase approach to efficiently insert tags into specific genomic loci via homology-directed repair (HDR) with minimal off-target effects. It is time-consuming and costly to perform whole-genome sequencing of each cell clone to check for spontaneous genetic variations occurring in mammalian cell lines. Therefore, we have developed an efficient validation pipeline of the generated cell lines consisting of junction PCR, Southern blotting analysis, Sanger sequencing, microscopy, western blotting analysis and live-cell imaging for cell-cycle dynamics. This protocol takes between 6 and 9 weeks. With this protocol, up to 70% of the targeted genes can be tagged homozygously with fluorescent proteins, thus resulting in physiological levels and phenotypically functional expression of the fusion proteins.

[1]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[2]  Stefan W. Hell,et al.  SiR–Hoechst is a far-red DNA stain for live-cell nanoscopy , 2015, Nature Communications.

[3]  David A. Scott,et al.  Double Nicking by RNA-Guided CRISPR Cas9 for Enhanced Genome Editing Specificity , 2013, Cell.

[4]  David R. Liu,et al.  Determining the specificities of TALENs, Cas9, and other genome-editing enzymes. , 2014, Methods in enzymology.

[5]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  Efficient Delivery of Genome-Editing Proteins In Vitro and In Vivo , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  M. Lieber,et al.  SCR7 is neither a selective nor a potent inhibitor of human DNA ligase IV. , 2016, DNA repair.

[7]  G. Seydoux,et al.  Cas9-assisted recombineering in C. elegans: genome editing using in vivo assembly of linear DNAs , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  High-throughput fluorescence microscopy for systems biology , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[9]  Marc Tessier-Lavigne,et al.  Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9 , 2016, Nature.

[10]  J. Murray,et al.  Increased Gene Targeting in Ku70 and Xrcc4 Transiently Deficient Human Somatic Cells , 2009, Molecular biotechnology.

[11]  Steven Lin,et al.  Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery , 2014, eLife.

[12]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9 , 2014, Nature.

[13]  A. Seluanov,et al.  DNA repair by homologous recombination, but not by nonhomologous end joining, is elevated in breast cancer cells. , 2009, Neoplasia.

[14]  David A. Scott,et al.  Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[15]  B. Conklin,et al.  Systematic quantification of HDR and NHEJ reveals effects of locus, nuclease, and cell type on genome-editing , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[16]  V. Iyer,et al.  Efficient genome modification by CRISPR-Cas9 nickase with minimal off-target effects , 2014, Nature Methods.

[17]  Daesik Kim,et al.  Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins , 2014, Genome research.

[18]  Sun‐Hae Hong,et al.  Tagging endogenous loci for live-cell fluorescence imaging and molecule counting using ZFNs, TALENs, and Cas9. , 2014, Methods in enzymology.

[19]  Andrei Seluanov,et al.  DNA repair by nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination during cell cycle in human cells , 2008, Cell cycle.

[20]  N. Lemp,et al.  Cryptic transcripts from a ubiquitous plasmid origin of replication confound tests for cis-regulatory function , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  F. Sanger,et al.  DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Jan Ellenberg,et al.  High-throughput fluorescence correlation spectroscopy enables analysis of proteome dynamics in living cells , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  Paul Theodor Pyl,et al.  The Genomic and Transcriptomic Landscape of a HeLa Cell Line , 2013, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[24]  Eli J. Fine,et al.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[26]  Wei-Chiang Shen,et al.  Fusion protein linkers: property, design and functionality. , 2013, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[27]  Meagan E. Sullender,et al.  Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9 , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  James E. DiCarlo,et al.  RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9 , 2013, Science.

[29]  Jan Ellenberg,et al.  Quantitative mapping of fluorescently tagged cellular proteins using FCS-calibrated four-dimensional imaging. , 2018, Nature protocols.

[30]  Joy Arakaki,et al.  Systematic gene tagging using CRISPR/Cas9 in human stem cells to illuminate cell organization , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.

[31]  Bernd Fischer,et al.  CellCognition: time-resolved phenotype annotation in high-throughput live cell imaging , 2010, Nature Methods.

[32]  Supriya V. Vartak,et al.  Inhibition of nonhomologous end joining to increase the specificity of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing , 2015, The FEBS journal.

[33]  A. De,et al.  An Inhibitor of Nonhomologous End-Joining Abrogates Double-Strand Break Repair and Impedes Cancer Progression , 2012, Cell.

[34]  U. Gaul,et al.  Efficient chromosomal gene modification with CRISPR/cas9 and PCR-based homologous recombination donors in cultured Drosophila cells , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  Lei S. Qi,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 in Genome Editing and Beyond. , 2016, Annual review of biochemistry.

[36]  J. Doudna,et al.  The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 , 2014, Science.

[37]  Namritha Ravinder,et al.  Rapid and highly efficient mammalian cell engineering via Cas9 protein transfection. , 2015, Journal of biotechnology.

[38]  Marco Foiani,et al.  Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[39]  V. Myer,et al.  Characterization of the interplay between DNA repair and CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA lesions at an endogenous locus , 2017, Nature Communications.

[40]  Artemis G. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  DIANA-mirExTra v2.0: Uncovering microRNAs and transcription factors with crucial roles in NGS expression data , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[41]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  Nuclear pore assembly proceeds by an inside-out extrusion of the nuclear envelope , 2016, eLife.

[42]  A. Heijink,et al.  The DNA damage response during mitosis. , 2013, Mutation research.

[43]  Jeffry D. Sander,et al.  CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  B. van Steensel,et al.  Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[45]  Antonio Z. Politi,et al.  Comparative assessment of fluorescent transgene methods for quantitative imaging in human cells , 2014, Molecular biology of the cell.

[46]  Christoph Heller,et al.  Principles of DNA separation with capillary electrophoresis , 2001, Electrophoresis.

[47]  Hidde L Ploegh,et al.  Inhibition of non-homologous end joining increases the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated precise [TM: inserted] genome editing , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.