Perceptual and decisional attenuation of tactile perception during the preparation of self- versus externally-generated movements

We investigated tactile perception during the execution of self- versus externally-generated movements. In a first experiment, we established the temporal characteristics of the movements of interest. In a second experiment, participants had to try to detect a short gap in an otherwise continuous vibratory stimulus delivered to their right wrist under conditions of rest, throwing (i.e., self-initiated movement), or catching a basketball (i.e., externally-generated movement). Our hypothesis was that different patterns of tactile sensitivity (d′) and response bias (criteria c and c′) would be observed as a function of the timing of gap delivery (i.e., during movement preparation or movement execution) and the type of movement (self- or externally-generated). A third experiment investigated tactile perception at rest while participants adopted different hand postures. This experiment also tested the simple preparation of the self-/externally-generated movements versus the observation of these targeted movements as performed by the experimenter. Due to sensory suppression, participants were significantly less sensitive in detecting the gap in tactile stimulation while executing the movement. Preparing to catch the ball only triggered a shift in response bias (i.e., participants were more liberal/conservative when reporting the gap in stimulation), but no change in perceptual sensitivity was observed, as compared to rest. Preparing to make a ball-throwing movement resulted in a significant decrement in tactile sensitivity, as well as a shift in participants’ criterion toward their being more conservative, when responding to the presence of the target. Similar decrements were observed for the observation of self-initiated movement preparation, but not for the observation of their externally-generated counterparts. Taken together, these results demonstrate that different forms of attenuation influence tactile perception, depending on the type of movement that is executed: perceptual and decisional attenuation for self-initiated movements, but only decisional attenuation for externally-generated movements. These results suggest that the movement preparation sensorimotor contingencies are already modulated in prefrontal decision-related cortical brain areas.

[1]  C. E. Chapman,et al.  Modulation of the response to a somatosensory stimulation of the hand during the observation of manual actions , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  M. Hallett,et al.  Mesial motor areas in self-initiated versus externally triggered movements examined with fMRI: effect of movement type and rate. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  C. Spence,et al.  Changes in tactile sensitivity over the time-course of a goal-directed movement , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[4]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[5]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[6]  A. Berardelli,et al.  Theta-Burst Stimulation-Induced Plasticity over Primary Somatosensory Cortex Changes Somatosensory Temporal Discrimination in Healthy Humans , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[8]  C. E. Chapman,et al.  Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. II. Effects of stimulus intensity. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Attention and suppression affect tactile perception in reach-to-grasp movements. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[10]  R. Passingham,et al.  Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. II. The effect of movement predictability on regional cerebral blood flow. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[12]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Supplementary motor area provides an efferent signal for sensory suppression. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[14]  J. Edeline,et al.  Evoked oscillations in the thalamo-cortical auditory system are present in anesthetized but not in unanesthetized rats. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  C. E. Chapman,et al.  Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. III. Effect of motor tasks. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Barry L Richardson,et al.  Modification of Magnitude Estimations in Thermotactile Perception during Self-Generated and Externally Generated Movements , 2005, Perception.

[17]  Sukhvinder S. Obhi,et al.  Internally generated and externally triggered actions are physically distinct and independently controlled , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Christian Büchel,et al.  Neural activity related to self‐ versus externally generated painful stimuli reveals distinct differences in the lateral pain system in a parametric fMRI study , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Johnny Chung Lee,et al.  Hacking the Nintendo Wii Remote , 2008, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[20]  C. Spence,et al.  Juggling reveals a decisional component to tactile suppression , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Neural Coding of Tactile Decisions in the Human Prefrontal Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  A. Goldman,et al.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Jefferson D. Grubb,et al.  Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  D. Wolpert,et al.  An improvement in perception of self-generated tactile stimuli following theta-burst stimulation of primary motor cortex , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  C. Marsden,et al.  Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. I. An investigation using measurement of regional cerebral blood flow with PET and movement-related potentials in normal and Parkinson's disease subjects. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  Gavin Buckingham,et al.  Gating of vibrotactile detection during visually guided bimanual reaches , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[28]  C. E. Chapman,et al.  Differential controls over tactile detection in humans by motor commands and peripheral reafference. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.