Design and fabrication of multichannel cochlear implants for animal research

The effectiveness of multichannel cochlear implants depends on the activation of perceptually distinct regions of the auditory nerve. Increased information transfer is possible as the number of channels and dynamic range are increased and electrical and neural interaction among channels is reduced. Human and animal studies have demonstrated that specific design features of the intracochlear electrode directly affect these performance factors. These features include the geometry, size, and orientation of the stimulating sites, proximity of the device to spiral ganglion neurons, shape and position of the insulating carrier, and the stimulation mode (monopolar, bipolar, etc.). Animal studies to directly measure the effects of changes in electrode design are currently constrained by the lack of available electrodes that model contemporary clinical devices. This report presents methods to design and fabricate species-specific customizable electrode arrays. We have successfully implanted these arrays in guinea pigs and cats for periods of up to 14 months and have conducted acute electrophysiological experiments in these animals. Modifications enabling long-term intracochlear drug infusion are also described. Studies using these scale model arrays will improve our understanding of how these devices function in human subjects and how we can best optimize future cochlear implants.

[1]  R. Hartmann,et al.  Electric-Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System , 1999, ORL.

[2]  John C Middlebrooks,et al.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  R. Schoonhoven,et al.  Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea , 1995, Hearing Research.

[4]  N. Cohen,et al.  Cochlear Implants , 2000 .

[5]  M. Lutman,et al.  Auditory Localization Abilities in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2005, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[6]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  A transparent model of the human scala tympani cavity , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  Adrien A Eshraghi,et al.  Modiolar Proximity of Three Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Electrodes , 2002, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[8]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve , 1987, Hearing Research.

[9]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: How and why , 2005, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[10]  Bruce J. Gantz,et al.  Acoustic plus Electric Speech Processing: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid Implant , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[11]  Lisa N Gillespie,et al.  BDNF‐induced survival of auditory neurons in vivo: Cessation of treatment leads to accelerated loss of survival effects , 2003, Journal of neuroscience research.

[12]  J. Frijns,et al.  Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea , 1996, Hearing Research.

[13]  R. Snyder,et al.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation induces selective survival of spiral ganglion neurons in neonatally deafened cats , 1991, Hearing Research.

[14]  Maike Vollmer,et al.  Plasticity in central representations in the inferior colliculus induced by chronic single- vs. two-channel electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant after neonatal deafness , 2000, Hearing Research.

[15]  R. Tyler,et al.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R. Shepherd,et al.  Response of inferior colliculus neurons to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in neonatally deafened cats. , 1999, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[17]  Ilmari Pyykkö,et al.  Neurotrophic factor intervention restores auditory function in deafened animals , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[19]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Combined Electroacoustic Stimulation in Conventional Candidates for Cochlear Implantation , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[20]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  The effect of electrode configuration and duration of deafness on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  B. Pfingst,et al.  Effects of electrode configuration on threshold functions for electrical stimulation of the cochlea , 1995, Hearing Research.

[22]  John C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Topographic Spread of Inferior Colliculus Activation in Response to Acoustic and Intracochlear Electric Stimulation , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[23]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  Adult Cochlear Implant Patient Performance with Evolving Electrode Technology , 2001, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[24]  Rainer Hartmann,et al.  Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents , 1998, Hearing Research.

[25]  R. Snyder,et al.  Temporal properties of chronic cochlear electrical stimulation determine temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Paul Kruszka,et al.  Neurotrophins can enhance spiral ganglion cell survival after inner hair cell loss , 1997, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience.

[27]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System: Results of a Clinical Study , 2005, Audiology and Neurotology.

[29]  R. Lousteau,et al.  Increased spiral ganglion cell survival in electrically stimulated, deafened guinea pig cochleae , 1987, The Laryngoscope.

[30]  T Lenarz,et al.  A silastic positioner for a modiolus-hugging position of intracochlear electrodes: electrophysiologic effects. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[31]  N Dillier,et al.  Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study. , 1998, The American journal of otology.

[32]  B Malgrange,et al.  NT‐3 and/or BDNF therapy prevents loss of auditory neurons following loss of hair cells , 1996, Neuroreport.

[33]  Stephanie B. Epp,et al.  Chronic depolarization enhances the trophic effects of brain‐derived neurotrophic factor in rescuing auditory neurons following a sensorineural hearing loss , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  M Vollmer,et al.  Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated intracochlear electrical pulses in deaf cats. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Preservation of Hearing in Cochlear Implant Surgery: Advantages of Combined Electrical and Acoustical Speech Processing , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[37]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Temporal Bone Results and Hearing Preservation with a New Straight Electrode , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[38]  G. E. Loeb,et al.  Design and fabrication of an experimental cochlear prosthesis , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[39]  H J McDermott,et al.  Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  C E Schreiner,et al.  Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. II. Repetition rate coding. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  Anatomical Considerations and Long-Term Effects of Electrical Stimulation , 2004 .

[42]  R Beitel,et al.  Temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus to intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of neonatal deafening and chronic stimulation. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Cochlear Implants: Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing , 2004, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[44]  John C Middlebrooks,et al.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  G. Wang,et al.  In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. , 1998, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[46]  Chris van den Honert,et al.  Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  W. Wei,et al.  Superiority of bilateral cochlear implantation over unilateral cochlear implantation in tone discrimination in chinese patients. , 2003, American journal of otolaryngology.

[48]  J. Brokx,et al.  Bilateral cochlear implantation in children. , 2003, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[49]  R. Snyder,et al.  Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[50]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Children: Localization Acuity Measured with Minimum Audible Angle , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[51]  A. Eshraghi,et al.  Comparative Study of Cochlear Damage With Three Perimodiolar Electrode Designs , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[52]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Localization ability with bimodal hearing aids and bilateral cochlear implants. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  G. M. Clark,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: The effect of electrode position on neural excitation , 1993, Hearing Research.

[54]  C E Schreiner,et al.  Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. II: Temporal properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus , 1991, Hearing Research.

[56]  Toshio Ishibashi,et al.  Factors Associated with Poor Outcome in Children with Acute Otitis Media , 2003, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[57]  R. Shepherd,et al.  Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Physiological and histopathological results. , 1983, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[58]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Chronic Electrical Stimulation with Intracochlear Electrodes: Electrophysiological Results , 1981, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[59]  Teresa Y. C. Ching,et al.  Binaural Benefits for Adults Who Use Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants in Opposite Ears , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[60]  T. Klenzner,et al.  Evaluation of the HiFocus electrode array with positioner in human temporal bones. , 2003, The Journal of laryngology and otology.

[61]  Gail S Donaldson,et al.  Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L). , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. II: Comparison of Spiral Clarion™ and HiFocus II™ electrodes , 2005, Hearing Research.

[63]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Effects of acoustic noise on the auditory nerve compound action potentials evoked by electric pulse trains , 2005, Hearing Research.

[64]  G M Clark,et al.  The Contour Electrode Array: Safety Study and Initial Patient Trials of a New Perimodiolar Design , 2001, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[65]  Maike Vollmer,et al.  The effects of chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation on inferior colliculus spatial representation in adult deafened cats , 2002, Hearing Research.

[66]  G M Clark,et al.  Comparison of electrode position in the human cochlea using various perimodiolar electrode arrays. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[67]  R. Snyder,et al.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation , 1990, Hearing Research.

[68]  Richard Ramsden,et al.  Evaluation of Bilaterally Implanted Adult Subjects with the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System , 2005, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.