Collaborative digital textbooks – a comparison of five different designs shaping teaching and learning

Collaborative Digital Text Books (cDTB) are emerging artifacts in Swedish schools, combining the quality assured content of traditional paper and digital text books with affordances for multimodal representation of knowledge, differentiated instruction, communication, collaboration, documentation and with varying learning activities. cDTB are meant to cover the content of the curriculum and provide a consistent learning environment. We analyzed and compared design features in five brands on the market 2017. The analytic comparison indicated that the studied cDTB are built on differing notions of how knowledge is represented as well as on how learners and teachers were supposed to engage with the content. The analysis revealed three types of cDTB distinguished by the way the information and social artifacts are designed. Type 1 resembles a traditional text book with limited multimodal representations of content, tools for working with the content, and tools for communication. Type 2, conversely, is rich in all these aspects but still rely on mainly pre-fabricated content. Type 3 takes a radical approach to content production and leaves it completely up to teachers to produce and share content. The result suggests three very different roles and levels of influence for the cDTB users. Regarding content, the study shows that cDTB are more versatile and quality confirmed learning environments in comparison with: digital “book in a box”; learning designs employing scattered digital resources that are not quality assured; and various digital tools that have no clear connection with the curriculum. The paper contributes to practice with the understanding that before starting to use cDTB there is a need to grasp that the choice of digital learning environment is a choice among very different designs.

[1]  N. Staffan Selander,et al.  Conceptualization of Multimodal and Distributed Designs for Learning , 2016 .

[2]  Martin Ebner,et al.  Potential of EPUB3 for Digital Textbooks in Higher Education , 2014, EC-TEL.

[3]  Andy Benoit,et al.  Textbook Affordability and Student Acceptance of eTextbooks: An Institutional Case-study , 2018, The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.

[4]  Qin Sun,et al.  Perceived value of interactive digital textbook and adaptive learning: Implications on student learning effectiveness , 2018, Journal of Education for Business.

[5]  Isabel Cañedo,et al.  Incorporating Internet Resources into Classroom Practice: Secondary School Teacher Action Plans. , 2012 .

[6]  C. Jewitt Multimodality and Literacy in School Classrooms , 2008 .

[7]  C. McFadden Are Textbooks Dead? Making Sense of the Digital Transition , 2012 .

[8]  G. Kress,et al.  Changing Text: A Social Semiotic Analysis of Textbooks , 2010 .

[9]  Jiyeon Ryu,et al.  The Effects of Digital Textbooks on College EFL Learners’ Self-Regulated Learning , 2017 .

[10]  R. A. Ellis,et al.  High school students' experiences of learning through research on the Internet , 2011, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[11]  Laura Parigi,et al.  Between tradition and innovation: the use of textbooks and didactic digital contents in classrooms , 2017 .

[12]  Carey Jewitt,et al.  Technology, Literacy, Learning: A Multimodal Approach , 2005 .

[13]  Gilbert A. Valverde According to the Book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks , 2002 .

[14]  Allen S. Lee Going Back to Basics in Design Science: From the IT Artifact to the IS Artifact , 2014 .

[15]  Suzanne de Castell,et al.  Language, authority, and criticism : readings on the school textbook , 1989 .

[16]  Dongho Kim,et al.  Entertaining Education: User Friendly Cutting Interface for Digital Textbooks , 2010, ICEC.

[17]  Jonas Vlachos,et al.  Trust-based evaluation in a market-oriented school system , 2019, Neoliberalism and Market Forces in Education.

[18]  Staffan Selander,et al.  Pedagogiske tekster for kommunikasjon og laering , 2004 .

[19]  Staffan Selander,et al.  Design för lärande - ett multimodalt perspektiv , 2010 .

[20]  Kevin Romig Should Geography Educators Adopt Electronic Textbooks? , 2017 .

[21]  Mark J. W. Lee,et al.  Personalised and Self Regulated Learning in the Web 2.0 Era: International Exemplars of Innovative Pedagogy Using Social Software. , 2010 .

[22]  Gunther Kress,et al.  Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning ! , 2005 .

[23]  Ulf Lundström,et al.  Educational marketization the Swedish way , 2013 .

[24]  Sara Hennessy,et al.  Incorporating Internet resources into classroom practice: pedagogical perspectives and strategies of secondary-school subject teachers , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  The effects of high/low interactive electronic storybooks on elementary school students' reading motivation, story comprehension and chromatics concepts , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Amanda J. Rockinson-Szapkiw,et al.  Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[27]  G. Kress,et al.  English in Urban Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective on Teaching and Learning , 2004 .

[28]  D. Jonassen Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? , 1991 .

[29]  Jeff Bezemer,et al.  Visualizing English: a social semiotic history of a school subject , 2009 .

[30]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective , 1998 .

[31]  Victor Moberger om Åsa Wikforss Alternativa fakta: Om kunskapen och dess fiender , 2018 .

[32]  Johannes Magenheim,et al.  New ways of learning: Comparing the effectiveness of interactive online media in distance education with the European textbook tradition , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[33]  J. Banks The Canon Debate, Knowledge Construction, and Multicultural Education , 1993, Diversity, Transformative Knowledge, and Civic Education.

[34]  Björn Sjödén What makes good educational software , 2015 .

[35]  Liang-Yi Li,et al.  Accessing online learning material: Quantitative behavior patterns and their effects on motivation and learning performance , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[36]  Randall Dunn,et al.  Motivating Students to Learn: Is There a Difference between Traditional Books and e-Books? , 2011 .

[37]  Rob Reynolds,et al.  Trends Influencing the Growth of Digital Textbooks in US Higher Education , 2011 .

[38]  Victor Moberger Recension av Åsa Wikforss, Alternativa fakta: Om kunskapen och dess fiender , 2018 .

[39]  Jason C. Fitzgerald,et al.  Textbooks and Primary Source Analysis , 2009, Social Studies Research and Practice.

[40]  Yaşar Kop,et al.  Determination of Secondary School Students Opinions About Internet Usage , 2017 .

[41]  P. Black,et al.  Developing the theory of formative assessment , 2009 .

[42]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  The Roles of Electronic Books in the Transformation of Learning and Instruction , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[43]  Gellof Kanselaar,et al.  Constructivism and socio-constructivism , 2002 .

[44]  Robert Biswas-Diener,et al.  Open-Source for Educational Materials Making Textbooks Cheaper and Better , 2017 .

[45]  D. Gonçalves,et al.  Digital Textbooks. What's new? , 2015 .

[46]  Aaron Doering,et al.  Integrating Educational Technology Into Teaching , 1996 .

[47]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[48]  D. Jonassen Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist Design Model , 1994 .

[49]  Luc Trouche,et al.  Collective design of an e-textbook: teachers’ collective documentation , 2016 .

[50]  Marcia A. Mardis,et al.  The Digital Lives of U.S. Teachers: A Research Synthesis and Trends to Watch , 2012 .

[51]  Dawn Bikowski,et al.  Interactive digital textbooks and engagement: A learning strategies framework , 2018 .

[52]  Mark J. W. Lee,et al.  Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era , 2007 .

[53]  Reynol Junco,et al.  Predicting course outcomes with digital textbook usage data , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[54]  Alejandro Ramírez Figueroa Abductive Reasoning. Logical Investigations into Discovery and Explanation , 2009 .

[55]  Elena Railean Impacts of Digital Revolution on Learning , 2017 .

[56]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age , 2009 .

[57]  Jae Soo Yoo,et al.  An XML-Based Digital Textbook and Its Educational Effectiveness , 2010, AST/UCMA/ISA/ACN.

[58]  Sakine Öngöz,et al.  Determination of Secondary Students’ Preferences Regarding Design Features Used in Digital Textbooks , 2017 .

[59]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Going back to basics in design science: from the information technology artifact to the information systems artifact , 2015, Inf. Syst. J..

[60]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  No name, no game: Challenges to use of collaborative digital textbooks , 2018, Education and Information Technologies.

[61]  Staffan Selander,et al.  Multimodal design, learning and cultures of recognition , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[62]  R. Merton,et al.  Genesis and development of a scientific fact , 1979 .

[63]  Anna Åkerfeldt,et al.  Design and recognition of multimodal texts: selection of digital tools and modes on the basis of social and material premises? , 2017, Journal of Computers in Education.

[64]  Michael Weisberg,et al.  Student Attitudes and Behaviors Towards Digital Textbooks , 2011 .

[65]  Donna Rogers,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning and Internet Searching , 2004, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[66]  Crispina Gregory K Han,et al.  Thinking with technology , 2010 .

[67]  Beverlee Jobrack Tyranny of the Textbook: An Insider Exposes How Educational Materials Undermine Reforms , 2011 .

[68]  Falk Pingel,et al.  UNESCO guidebook on textbook research and textbook revision , 1999 .

[69]  P. Gertler,et al.  Books or laptops? The effect of shifting from printed to digital delivery of educational content on learning☆ , 2017 .

[70]  Corrado Matta,et al.  Scientific Representation and Science Learning , 2014 .