Tailor-made composite functions as tools in model choice: the case of sigmoidal vs bi-linear growth profiles

BackgroundRoots are the classical model system to study the organization and dynamics of organ growth zones. Profiles of the velocity of root elements relative to the apex have generally been considered to be sigmoidal. However, recent high-resolution measurements have yielded bi-linear profiles, suggesting that sigmoidal profiles may be artifacts caused by insufficient spatio-temporal resolution. The decision whether an empirical velocity profile follows a sigmoidal or bi-linear distribution has consequences for the interpretation of the underlying biological processes. However, distinguishing between sigmoidal and bi-linear curves is notoriously problematic. A mathematical function that can describe both types of curve equally well would allow them to be distinguished by automated curve-fitting.ResultsOn the basis of the mathematical requirements defined, we created a composite function and tested it by fitting it to sigmoidal and bi-linear models with different noise levels (Monte-Carlo datasets) and to three experimental datasets from roots of Gypsophila elegans, Aurinia saxatilis, and Arabidopsis thaliana. Fits of the function proved robust with respect to noise and yielded statistically sound results if care was taken to identify reasonable initial coefficient values to start the automated fitting procedure. Descriptions of experimental datasets were significantly better than those provided by the Richards function, the most flexible of the classical growth equations, even in cases in which the data followed a smooth sigmoidal distribution.ConclusionFits of the composite function introduced here provide an independent criterion for distinguishing sigmoidal and bi-linear growth profiles, but without forcing a dichotomous decision, as intermediate solutions are possible. Our function thus facilitates an unbiased, multiple-working hypothesis approach. While our discussion focusses on kinematic growth analysis, this and similar tailor-made functions will be useful tools wherever models of steadily or abruptly changing dependencies between empirical parameters are to be compared.

[1]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Temperature Affects Expansion Rate of Maize Leaves without Change in Spatial Distribution of Cell Length (Analysis of the Coordination between Cell Division and Cell Expansion) , 1995, Plant physiology.

[2]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1967 .

[3]  C. J. Nelson,et al.  Assessment of spatial distribution of growth in the elongation zone of grass leaf blades. , 1987, Plant physiology.

[4]  P. Barlow,et al.  Cellular Growth in Roots of a Gibberellin-Deficient Mutant of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) and its Wild-type , 1991 .

[5]  N. Bernstein,et al.  The Determination of Relative Elemental Growth Rate Profiles from Segmental Growth Rates (A Methodological Evaluation) , 1997, Plant physiology.

[6]  R. O. Erickson,et al.  Kinematics of plant growth. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  S. Cooper,et al.  What is the bacterial growth law during the division cycle? , 1988, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  Kannappan Palaniappan,et al.  A New Algorithm for Computational Image Analysis of Deformable Motion at High Spatial and Temporal Resolution Applied to Root Growth. Roughly Uniform Elongation in the Meristem and Also, after an Abrupt Acceleration, in the Elongation Zone1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[9]  Winfried S Peters,et al.  Forisomes, a novel type of Ca(2+)-dependent contractile protein motor. , 2004, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[10]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[11]  Jan Vos,et al.  A flexible sigmoid function of determinate growth. , 2003, Annals of botany.

[12]  Use of a flexible logistic function to describe axial growth of plants , 1992 .

[13]  W. Silk,et al.  Quantitative Descriptions of Development , 1984 .

[14]  Jay I. Myung,et al.  Model Comparison Methods , 2004, Numerical Computer Methods, Part D.

[15]  W. Silk,et al.  Growth Patterns Inferred from Anatomical Records : Empirical Tests Using Longisections of Roots of Zea mays L. , 1989, Plant physiology.

[16]  H. E. Kubitschek Bilinear cell growth of Escherichia coli , 1981, Journal of bacteriology.

[17]  M. E. Johnson,et al.  A Comparative Study of Tests for Homogeneity of Variances, with Applications to the Outer Continental Shelf Bidding Data , 1981 .

[18]  B. Novák,et al.  Length growth in fission yeast: is growth exponential?--No. , 1998, Microbiology.

[19]  R. O. Erickson Modeling of Plant Growth , 1976 .

[20]  F. J. Richards A Flexible Growth Function for Empirical Use , 1959 .

[21]  S. Cooper Length extension in growing yeast: is growth exponential?--yes. , 1998, Microbiology.

[22]  R. T. Brumfield CELL GROWTH AND DIVISION IN LIVING ROOT MERISTEMS , 1942 .

[23]  F. Steward Plant physiology: A treatise. Vol. 5. Analysis of growth. A. Behaviour of plants and their organs. B. The responses of cells and tissues in culture. , 1967 .

[24]  P. Gandar Growth in Root Apices. I. The Kinematic Description of Growth , 1983, Botanical Gazette.

[25]  F. J. Richards The Quantitative Analysis of Growth , 1969 .

[26]  S. Glantz,et al.  Primer of Applied Regression & Analysis of Variance , 1990 .

[27]  W. Peters Growth rate gradients and extracellular pH in roots: how to control an explosion. , 2004, The New phytologist.

[28]  D. R. Causton,et al.  The Biometry of Plant Growth , 1982 .

[29]  J. Mitchison,et al.  Growth during the cell cycle. , 2003, International review of cytology.

[30]  R. E. Sharp,et al.  Growth of the Maize Primary Root at Low Water Potentials : II. Role of Growth and Deposition of Hexose and Potassium in Osmotic Adjustment. , 1990, Plant physiology.

[31]  Paul R. Fisher,et al.  Quantifying the relationship between phases of stem elongation and flower initiation in poinsettia , 1996 .

[32]  A. List,et al.  Mathematical Analysis of Plant Growth zea mays Primary Roots. , 1973, Plant physiology.

[33]  R. E. Sharp,et al.  Growth of the maize primary root at low water potentials : I. Spatial distribution of expansive growth. , 1988, Plant physiology.

[34]  P. Nissen Multiphasic Uptake Mechanisms in Plants , 1991 .

[35]  Peters,et al.  The Correlation of Profiles of Surface pH and Elongation Growth in Maize Roots. , 1999, Plant physiology.

[36]  P. Gandar Growth in Root Apices. II. Deformation and Rate of Deformation , 1983, Botanical Gazette.

[37]  Kannappan Palaniappan,et al.  Non-rigid motion estimation using the robust tensor method , 2004, 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop.

[38]  T. Baskin,et al.  Analysis of cell division and elongation underlying the developmental acceleration of root growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 1998, Plant physiology.

[39]  J. Monteith,et al.  A Mathematical Function for Crop Growth Based on Light Interception and Leaf Area Expansion , 1990 .

[40]  W. Fricke,et al.  The Biophysics of Leaf Growth in Salt-Stressed Barley. A Study at the Cell Level1 , 2002, Plant Physiology.

[41]  Richard H. Goodwin,et al.  STUDIES ON ROOTS. III. AN ANALYSIS OF ROOT GROWTH IN PHLEUM PRATENSE USING PHOTOMICROGRAPHIC RECORDS , 1956 .

[42]  R. Hilborn,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1997 .