Evaluation of wound healing process based on texture image analysis

Wound healing rate remains an interesting and important issue, in which modern imaging techniques have not yet given a definitive answer. In order to guide better therapeutic interventions, a better understanding of the fundamental mechanisms driving tissue repair are required. The wound healing rate is primarily quantified by the rate of change of the wound’s surface area. The objective of this work is to establish a standardized and objective technique to assess the progress of wound healing in wounds appearing on patient’s feet, by means of texture image analysis. Image pre-processing, segmentation, texture and geometrical analysis together with visual expert’s evaluation were used to assess the wound healing process. A total of 77 digital images from 11 different subjects with foot wounds were taken every third day, for 21 days, by an inexpensive digital camera under different lighting conditions. The images were intensity normalized, and wounds were automatic segmented using a segmentation system based on snakes. From the segmented wounds, 56 different texture features and 4 different geometrical measures were extracted in order to identify features that quantify the rate of wound healing. Texture features that may indicate the progression of wound healing process were identified. More specifically, certain texture features increase (mean, contrast, roughness and radial sum), while some other texture features decrease (sum of squares variance, sum variance, sum average, entropy, coarseness, EE-laws texture energy measures and the Hurst coefficients for fractal dimension one and two analysis) with the progression of the wound healing process. These features were found to be significantly different at an observed time point during the wound healing process, when compared to previous different time points, and this could be used to indicate the rate of wound healing. No significant differences were found for all geometrical measures extracted from the wounds between different time points. Based on the results of this study, it is suggested that some texture features might be used to monitor the wound healing process, thus reducing the workload of experts, provide standardization, reduce costs, and improve the treatment quality for patients. The simplicity of the method also suggests that it may be a valuable tool in clinical wound evaluation. A larger scale study is needed to establish the application in clinical practice and for computing texture features and geometrical measures that may provide information for better and earlier differentiation of the wound healing process. Future work will incorporate additional texture features and geometrical measures for assessing the wound healing process in order to be used in the real clinical practice.

[1]  A. Hoppe,et al.  Analysis of Skin Wound Images Using Digital Color Image Processing: A Preliminary Communication , 2004, The international journal of lower extremity wounds.

[2]  Christos P. Loizou,et al.  Evaluation of wound healing process based on texture analysis , 2012, 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Bioinformatics & Bioengineering (BIBE).

[3]  Nicolas Rannou,et al.  Image analysis of chronic wounds for determining the surface area , 2010, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[4]  Benjamin Albouy,et al.  Three-Dimensional Assessment of Skin Wounds Using a Standard Digital Camera , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Robert King,et al.  Textural features corresponding to textural properties , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[6]  C. SOLOMON,et al.  The use of video image analysis for the measurement of venous ulcers , 1995, The British journal of dermatology.

[7]  A. Boulton,et al.  The global burden of diabetic foot disease , 2005, The Lancet.

[8]  C.S. Pattichis,et al.  An Integrated System for the Segmentation of Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[9]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[10]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[11]  P. Plassmann,et al.  An instrument to measure the dimensions of skin wounds , 1995 .

[12]  Yves Vander Haeghen,et al.  An imaging system with calibrated color image acquisition for use in dermatology , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[15]  Mubarak Shah,et al.  A Fast algorithm for active contours and curvature estimation , 1992, CVGIP Image Underst..

[16]  G. Rodeheaver,et al.  Guidelines for the treatment of pressure ulcers , 2006, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[17]  M Flanagan,et al.  Wound measurement: can it help us to monitor progression to healing? , 2003, Journal of wound care.

[18]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  A Comparative Study of Texture Measures for Terrain Classification , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[19]  Tim K. Lee,et al.  Determining the asymmetry of skin lesion with fuzzy borders , 2005, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[20]  W. Westerhof,et al.  Image processing in the study of wound healing. , 1995, Clinics in dermatology.

[21]  Begoña Acha,et al.  Segmentation and classification of burn images by color and texture information. , 2005, Journal of biomedical optics.

[22]  Marina Kolesnik,et al.  Segmentation of wounds in the combined color-texture feature space , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.