Dissipated energy as a method to characterize the cartilage damage in large animal joints: an in vitro testing model.

Several quantitative methods for the in vitro characterization of cartilage quality are available. However, only a few of these methods allow surgical cartilage manipulations and the subsequent analysis of the friction properties of complete joints. This study introduces an alternative approach to the characterization of the friction properties of entire joint surfaces using the dissipated energy during motion of the joint surfaces. Seven sheep wrist joints obtained post mortem were proximally and distally fixed to a material testing machine. With the exception of the carpometacarpal articulation surface, all joint articulations were fixed with 'Kirschner' wires. Three cartilage defects were simulated with a surgically introduced groove (16 mm(2), 32 mm(2), 300 mm(2)) and compared to intact cartilage without an artificial defect. The mean dissipated energy per cycle was calculated from the hysteresis curve during ten torsional motion cycles (±10°) under constant axial preload (100-900 N). A significant increase in dissipated energy was observed with increasing cartilage defect size and axial load (p<0.001). At lower load levels, the intact and 16 mm(2) defect showed a similar dissipated energy (p>0.073), while all other defect conditions were significantly different (p=0.015). All defect sizes were significantly different (p=0.049) at 900 N axial load. We conclude that the method introduced here could be an alternative for the study of cartilage damage, and further applications based on the principles of this method could be developed for the evaluation of different cartilage treatments.

[1]  V. Sikavitsas,et al.  Experimental Friction Coefficients for Bovine Cartilage Measured with a Pin-on-Disk Tribometer: Testing Configuration and Lubricant Effects , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Zhongmin Jin,et al.  Biotribology of articular cartilage--a review of the recent advances. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[3]  J. Block,et al.  Unload it: the key to the treatment of knee osteoarthritis , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[4]  E. Tanaka,et al.  The Frictional Coefficient of the Temporomandibular Joint and Its Dependency on the Magnitude and Duration of Joint Loading , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[5]  J Fisher,et al.  Influence of hyaluronic acid on the time-dependent friction response of articular cartilage under different conditions , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[6]  G. Ateshian,et al.  The temporal response of the friction coefficient of articular cartilage depends on the contact area. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  G. Jay,et al.  Coefficients of friction, lubricin, and cartilage damage in the anterior cruciate ligament‐deficient guinea pig knee , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  B. Jolles,et al.  Effect of biomagnetic therapy versus physiotherapy for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[9]  J. Crisco,et al.  Assuming exponential decay by incorporating viscous damping improves the prediction of the coeffcient of friction in pendulum tests of whole articular joints , 2007, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[10]  J. Bijlsma,et al.  The canine 'groove' model of osteoarthritis is more than simply the expression of surgically applied damage. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[11]  E. Tanaka,et al.  Superficial zone protein affects boundary lubrication on the surface of mandibular condylar cartilage , 2011, Cell and Tissue Research.

[12]  J CHARNLEY,et al.  The Lubrication of Animal Joints in Relation to Surgical Reconstruction by Arthroplasty * , 1960, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  J. Bertram,et al.  Freeze-thaw treatment effects on the dynamic mechanical properties of articular cartilage , 2010, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[14]  K. Athanasiou,et al.  Tensile Properties, Collagen Content, and Crosslinks in Connective Tissues of the Immature Knee Joint , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  G. Torkaman,et al.  Biotribological and biomechanical changes after experimental haemarthrosis in the rabbit knee , 2011, Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia.

[16]  J. Crisco,et al.  Comparison of two methods for calculating the frictional properties of articular cartilage using a simple pendulum and intact mouse knee joints. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  D Dowson,et al.  "Boosted lubrication" in synovial joints by fluid entrapment and enrichment. , 1968, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[18]  Gerard A Ateshian,et al.  Effect of dynamic loading on the frictional response of bovine articular cartilage. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  B. Palmieri,et al.  Intra-Articular Injections for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis , 2011, Drugs in R&D.

[20]  K. Komvopoulos,et al.  Increased friction coefficient and superficial zone protein expression in patients with advanced osteoarthritis. , 2010, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[21]  S. Nakaji,et al.  Knee osteoarthritis, knee joint pain and aging in relation to increasing serum hyaluronan level in the Japanese population. , 2011, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[22]  V. Sikavitsas,et al.  Friction coefficients for mechanically damaged bovine articular cartilage , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  Y. Iwamoto,et al.  Mechanical effects of the intraarticular administration of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid plus phospholipid on synovial joint lubrication and prevention of articular cartilage degeneration in experimental osteoarthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.