Performance of switching-based partial relay selection scheme for amplify-and-forward cognitive relay networks

The outage probabilities (OPs) of cognitive amplify-and-forward systems with the conventional and the switching-based partial relay selection (PRS) schemes over independent but not identically distributed Rayleigh fading channels are evaluated. The conventional PRS scheme always depends on the instantaneous channel quality of the first hop, while the switching-based PRS scheme is based on the estimated average channel state information (CSI) of the first and second hops. For the switching-based PRS scheme, the instantaneous CSI for links with the smaller average channel power in the first and the second hops for each end-to-end path is used for relay selection. Thus, the switching-based PRS scheme counts on the instantaneous CSI of either the first or second hop. The tight lower bounds and asymptotic expressions of the OP are derived. The feedback overheads of both schemes are discussed. Simulation results substantiate the theoretical analysis and also reveal that the switching-based PRS outperforms the conventional one over the cognitive relay networks in terms of OP.

[1]  Daniel Benevides da Costa,et al.  Cognitive Amplify-and-Forward Relay Networks Over Nakagami- $m$ Fading , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[2]  Daniel Benevides da Costa,et al.  Asymptotic Analysis of Cooperative Diversity Systems With Relay Selection in a Spectrum-Sharing Scenario , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  Keping Long,et al.  Partial Relay Selection With Fixed-Gain Relays and Outdated CSI in Underlay Cognitive Networks , 2013, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[4]  Xing Zhang,et al.  Exact Outage Performance of Cognitive Relay Networks with Maximum Transmit Power Limits , 2011, IEEE Communications Letters.

[5]  Xing Zhang,et al.  Performance Analysis of Cognitive Relay Networks Over Nakagami- $m$ Fading Channels , 2015, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[7]  Yue Gao,et al.  On the Study of Outage Performance for Cognitive Relay Networks (CRN) with the Nth Best-Relay Selection in Rayleigh-fading Channels , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[8]  Tran Trung Duy,et al.  Relay Selection for Security Enhancement in Cognitive Relay Networks , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[9]  Chintha Tellambura,et al.  On the Performance of Cognitive Underlay Multihop Networks with Imperfect Channel State Information , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[10]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Breaking Spectrum Gridlock With Cognitive Radios: An Information Theoretic Perspective , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  Daniel Benevides da Costa,et al.  Cognitive Amplify-and-Forward Relaying with Best Relay Selection in Non-Identical Rayleigh Fading , 2013, IEEE Communications Letters.

[12]  John S. Thompson,et al.  Amplify-and-forward with partial relay selection , 2008, IEEE Communications Letters.

[13]  Hans-Jurgen Zepernick,et al.  Cooperative spectrum sharing networks with AF relay and selection diversity , 2011 .

[14]  Shaoqian Li,et al.  Outage Probability and SER of Amplify-and-Forward Cognitive Relay Networks , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[15]  In-Ho Lee Outage Performance of Efficient Partial Relay Selection in Amplify-and-Forward Relaying Systems over Rayleigh Fading Channels , 2012, IEEE Communications Letters.

[16]  Hans-Jurgen Zepernick,et al.  Exact outage probability of cognitive AF relaying with underlay spectrum sharing , 2011 .

[17]  Mazen O. Hasna,et al.  Outage probability of multihop transmission over Nakagami fading channels , 2003, IEEE Communications Letters.