An empirical assessment of transaction risks of IT outsourcing arrangements: an event study

Our paper uses stock market reactions to assess various risks associated with IT outsourcing. Because much of the value and cost of IT outsourcing is intangible, hidden, and long-term oriented, most prior studies have articulated IT outsourcing risks conceptually and paid little attention to an empirical validation of such risks. We employ an event study methodology to assess how investors perceive and evaluate the risks related to IT outsourcing. More precisely, we empirically test the extent to which sources of IT outsourcing transaction risk (including asset-specificity, resource dependency, technological discontinuity, and performance monitoring) influence investors' reactions to IT outsourcing announcements. Our results indicate that investors exhibit two extreme responses: one perceives that benefits from IT outsourcing outweigh the risks associated with it; the other adopts the exact opposite view. Further analyses reveal that asset specificity of the IT resources to be outsourced and the size of the contract are negatively correlated with investors' reactions as measured by stocks' cumulative abnormal returns (CARs). Contrary to our predictions, contract duration and performance monitoring problems were not significantly associated with the market reaction. We discuss these findings and offer implications for both research and practice.

[1]  B. Loasby The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[2]  Kalyan Chatterjee,et al.  Dual sourcing in repeated procurement competitions , 1995 .

[3]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  The impact of information systems on organizations and markets , 1991, CACM.

[4]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Determinants of Information Technology Outsourcing: A Cross-Sectional Analysis , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Toward an Assessment of Software Development Risk , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  F. Lord A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  J. Bakos,et al.  From vendors to partners: Information technology and incomplete contracts in buyer‐supplier relationships , 1993 .

[8]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Exploring relationships in information technology outsourcing: the interaction approach , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Sridhar Narasimhan,et al.  Information Systems Outsourcing: A Study of Pre-Event Firm Characteristics , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Reducing information systems costs through insourcing: experiences from the field , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Transformation of the IT Function at British Petroleum , 1997, MIS Q..

[12]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Effect of Service Quality and Partnership on the Outsourcing of Information Systems Functions , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  John C. Windsor,et al.  Risks and Effects of IS/IT Outsourcing: A Securities Market Assessment1 , 2002 .

[14]  Varun Grover,et al.  Research Report: A Reexamination of IT Investment and the Market Value of the Firm - An Event Study Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  L. Willcocks,et al.  The Value of Selective IT Sourcing , 1996 .

[16]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[17]  Brad Quinn Post,et al.  A Business Case Framework for Group Support Technology , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Assessing the risk of IT outsourcing , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  Ken Peffers,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology Investment Announcements on the Market Value of the Firm , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Lawrence Loh,et al.  Diffusion of Information Technology Outsourcing: Influence Sources and the Kodak Effect , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Peter Weill,et al.  Managing Investment in Information Technology: Mini Case Examples and Implications , 1989, MIS Q..

[22]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  Strategic Response to Institutional Influences on Information Systems Outsourcing , 1997 .

[23]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  A two-level investigation of information systems outsourcing , 1996, CACM.

[24]  O. Williamson Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations , 1979, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[25]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  Analyzing IT outsourcing relationships as alliances among multiple clients and vendors , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[26]  R. Cyert,et al.  Theory of the Firm , 1966 .

[27]  M. J. Earl,et al.  The Risks of Outsourcing IT , 1996 .

[28]  Jacqueline L. Reck,et al.  The Market's Reaction to Information Systems Outsourcing Announcements , 1999 .

[29]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  The Effects of Firm Characteristics on Investor Reaction to IT Investment Announcements , 2001, ICIS.

[30]  Thomas Kern,et al.  An exploration of the application service provision outsourcing option , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[31]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Architecture of Simplicity , 1993 .

[32]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .