Are agricultural land use patterns influenced by farmer imitation

This paper proposes a methodology based solely on spatial data to analyse whether and, to what extent, farmer imitation leaves an observable footprint on an agricultural landscape. Geographical Information System (GIS) analysis of parcel and farm location data of a study region in central Belgium was developed as an alternative methodology to farmer interviews. Results suggest that imitation is not an important determinant of agricultural land use patterns in the study area. The effect of imitation on landscapes is limited to the extent of being hardly significant. Neighbouring parcels cultivated by farmers who live in close proximity are only slightly more similar than neighbouring parcels cultivated by farmers who live further away from one another. The results question the validity of the assumptions underlying agent-based models that try to explain agricultural land use through imitation behaviour. The results should, however, be considered with caution as the proposed methodology has two limitations. First, comparison between neighbouring parcels could not identify the imitation effect from all factors that influence agricultural land use. Relative space was not accounted for, which led to two possible explanations for the similarity of neighbouring parcels: imitation or the location of a parcel relative to the farm. Secondly, the method was applied to aggregated land use classes for a single year, which did not allow for the effect of crop rotations in understanding imitation behaviour. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  S. Whatmore,et al.  Technological Change and the Rural Environment , 2023 .

[2]  Gershon Feder,et al.  The adoption of agricultural innovations: A review , 1993 .

[3]  A. Veldkamp,et al.  CLUE: a conceptual model to study the Conversion of Land Use and its Effects , 1996 .

[4]  Mark Rounsevell,et al.  Exploring a spatio‐dynamic neighbourhood‐based model of residential behaviour in the Brussels periurban area , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Robert Lempert,et al.  Agent-based modeling as organizational and public policy simulators , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior , 1991 .

[7]  Ronald W McQuaid,et al.  Alternative job search strategies in remote rural and peri-urban labour markets: the role of social networks , 2005 .

[8]  Barbara Wejnert Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: a Conceptual Framework. , 2002 .

[9]  H Roberts,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , 1994 .

[10]  Johann Heinrich von Thünen Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie , 1990 .

[11]  Mark Rounsevell,et al.  The limitations of spatial land use data in environmental analysis , 2006 .

[12]  A. Stockdale,et al.  Out-migration from rural Scotland: The importance of family and social networks , 2002 .

[13]  Hubert Beguin Méthodes d'analyse géographique quantitative , 1979 .

[14]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[15]  Paul Schot,et al.  Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities , 2004 .

[16]  Sandra L. Hofferth,et al.  Social Capital in Rural and Urban Communities1 , 1998 .

[17]  M. Janssen,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review , 2003 .

[18]  Isabelle Reginster,et al.  Modelling the spatial distribution of agricultural land use at the regional scale , 2003 .

[19]  C. Bell,et al.  Property, paternalism, and power : class and control in rural England , 1980 .

[20]  Gilbert W. Gillespie,et al.  The Sociology Of Agriculture , 1990 .

[21]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[22]  K. Halfacree The importance of "the rural" in the constitution of counterurbanization: evidence from England in the 1980s. , 1994, Sociologia ruralis.

[23]  Kor de Jong,et al.  A method to analyse neighbourhood characteristics of land use patterns , 2004, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[24]  Anthony Giddens,et al.  On the Edge: Living With Global Capitalism , 2000 .

[25]  A. Giddens Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age , 1992, The New Social Theory Reader.

[26]  Y. Chiffoleau,et al.  Learning about innovation through networks: the development of environment-friendly viticulture , 2004 .

[27]  Kees Burger,et al.  Innovation and imitation: Adoption of cocoa by Indonesian smallholders , 1995 .

[28]  Roger White,et al.  Cellular Automata and Fractal Urban Form: A Cellular Modelling Approach to the Evolution of Urban Land-Use Patterns , 1993 .

[29]  B. Ryan The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities , 1943 .

[30]  Torsten Hägerstrand,et al.  Innovation Diffusion As a Spatial Process , 1967 .

[31]  László Letenyei,et al.  Rural innovation chains. Two examples for the diffusion of rural innovations , 2001 .

[32]  G. Keith Warriner,et al.  Kinship and personal communication network influences on the adoption of agriculture conservation technology , 1992 .

[33]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .

[34]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[35]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  The Dynamics of Cultural Influence Networks , 2002, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[36]  R. Bollman,et al.  Informal rural networks: their contribution to "making a living" and creating rural employment. , 1997 .

[37]  Thomas Berger,et al.  Agent-based spatial models applied to agriculture: A simulation tool , 2001 .

[38]  Veronique Souchere,et al.  Grassland and crop trends: role of the European Union Common Agricultural Policy and consequences for runoff and soil erosion , 2003 .

[39]  Henk Elffers,et al.  Analysing neighbourhood influence in criminology , 2003 .

[40]  C. Vlek,et al.  Behaviour in commons dilemmas: Homo economicus and Homo psychologicus in an ecological-economic model , 2000 .

[41]  Guy Engelen,et al.  Cellular Automata as the Basis of Integrated Dynamic Regional Modelling , 1997 .

[42]  Anne-Ruth Mackor Proceedings of the AISB '03 Second International Symposium on Imitation in Animals and Artifacts. , 2003 .

[43]  Michael Batty,et al.  Urban Systems as Cellular Automata , 1997 .

[44]  Nicholas Mark Gotts,et al.  IMITATIVE VERSUS NONIMITATIVE STRATEGIES IN A LAND-USE SIMULATION , 2001, Cybern. Syst..