Expertise Matching via Constraint-Based Optimization

Expertise matching, aiming to find the alignment between experts and queries, is a common problem in many real applications such as conference paper-reviewer assignment, product-reviewer alignment, and product-endorser matching. Most of existing methods for this problem usually find “relevant” experts for each query independently by using, e.g., an information retrieval method. However, in real-world systems, various domain-specific constraints must be considered. For example, to review a paper, it is desirable that there is at least one senior reviewer to guide the reviewing process. An important question is: “Can we design a framework to efficiently find the optimal solution for expertise matching under various constraints?” This paper explores such an approach by formulating the expertise matching problem in a constraint based optimization framework. Interestingly, the problem can be linked to a convex cost flow problem, which guarantees an optimal solution under given constraints. We also present an online matching algorithm to support incorporating user feedbacks in real time. The proposed approach has been evaluated on two different genres of expertise matching problems. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

[1]  David Hartvigsen,et al.  The Conference Paper‐Reviewer Assignment Problem* , 1999 .

[2]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Formal models for expert finding in enterprise corpora , 2006, SIGIR.

[3]  Stefano Ferilli,et al.  GRAPE: An Expert Review Assignment Component for Scientific Conference Management Systems , 2005, IEA/AIE.

[4]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Hierarchical Language Models for Expert Finding in Enterprise Corpora , 2008, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[5]  Jun Wang,et al.  A Hybrid Knowledge and Model Approach for Reviewer Assignment , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[6]  P. Beraldi,et al.  Parallel Algorithms for Solving the Convex Minimum Cost Flow Problem , 2001, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[7]  Naren Ramakrishnan,et al.  Recommender systems for the conference paper assignment problem , 2009, RecSys '09.

[8]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  ChengXiang Zhai,et al.  Constrained multi-aspect expertise matching for committee review assignment , 2009, CIKM.

[10]  Ravindra K. Ahuja,et al.  Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications , 1993 .

[11]  Michael J. Pazzani,et al.  Mining for proposal reviewers: lessons learned at the national science foundation , 2006, KDD '06.

[12]  Ruoming Jin,et al.  A Topic Modeling Approach and Its Integration into the Random Walk Framework for Academic Search , 2008, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[13]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Finding scientific topics , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Automating the assignment of submitted manuscripts to reviewers , 1992, SIGIR '92.

[15]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Hierarchical Language Models for Expert Finding in Enterprise Corpora , 2006, 2006 18th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'06).

[16]  Geneva G. Belford,et al.  Multi-aspect expertise matching for review assignment , 2008, CIKM '08.

[17]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Expertise modeling for matching papers with reviewers , 2007, KDD '07.

[18]  ChengXiang Zhai,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Expert Finding , 2007, ECIR.

[19]  Jie Tang,et al.  ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networks , 2008, KDD.