Comparative evaluation of facility management services for housing estates

Abstract Urbanised areas are increasingly developed with housing estates. Further to their design and construction, the services provided for managing the estates’ facilities are crucial to the living quality of numerous habitants there. Holistic study findings on the importance, performance and cost-effectiveness of such facility management (FM) services, especially those between like estates, have yet to be seen. For bridging this knowledge gap, a study was conducted, under which the main aspects of the typical services namely security, cleaning, repair & maintenance, leisure & landscape, and general management were identified in the first stage. In the second stage, the costs of FM services in two comparable estates and the users’ perceived importance and performance of the services were collected. The responses drawn from their consistent judgments, after processing by an analytical hierarchy process, were examined against a performance–importance evaluation matrix. Statistical tests were applied to identify the services with different qualities, and a set of weighted performance indicators was computed for representing the cost-effectiveness of the services. Comparisons made between these indicators informed which service or aspect was provided in a more, or less, cost-effective way. Wider adoption of this evaluation approach would facilitate performance benchmarking across estates, which is conducive to attaining quality and cost-effective services.

[1]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[2]  Ekambaram Palaneeswaran,et al.  Satisfaction of residents on public housings built before and after implementation of ISO9000 , 2011 .

[3]  Mohammad Abdul Mohit,et al.  Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia , 2010 .

[4]  Edwin H.W. Chan,et al.  Density control and the quality of living space: a case study of private housing development in Hong Kong , 2002 .

[5]  Francis W.H. Yik,et al.  Perception of importance and performance of the indoor environmental quality of high-rise residential buildings , 2009 .

[6]  T. Savasdisara,et al.  Residential satisfaction in private estates in Bangkok: A comparison of low-cost housing estates and determinant factors∗ , 1989 .

[7]  Jyh-Bin Yang,et al.  Development of a customer satisfaction evaluation model for construction project management , 2008 .

[8]  A.M.M Liu,et al.  Residential satisfaction in housing estates: a Hong Kong perspective , 1999 .

[9]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[10]  Ke Chen,et al.  Design for tenant fitout , 1997 .

[11]  E. Hui,et al.  Measuring customer satisfaction of FM service in housing sector: A structural equation model approach , 2010 .

[12]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World , 1982 .

[13]  William F. Maloney.  Construction Product/Service and Customer Satisfaction , 2002 .

[14]  David Martin,et al.  An Importance/Performance Analysis of Service Providers' Perception of Quality Service in the Hotel Industry , 1995 .

[15]  Adenrele Awotona,et al.  The perception of housing conditions in Nigeria by the urban poor , 1988 .

[16]  Julia O. Beamish,et al.  Assessment of residents' satisfaction with public housing in Abuja, Nigeria , 1997 .

[17]  J. Lai.  Investigating the quality of FM services in residential buildings , 2010 .