Coordinate Regulation of DNA Methylation and H3K27me3 in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

Chromatin is separated into functional domains distinguished by combinatorial patterns of post-translational histone modifications and DNA methylation. Recent studies examining multiple histone modifications have found numerous chromatin states with distinct profiles of chromatin marks and functional enrichments. There are data showing coordinate regulation between DNAme and H3K27me3, which are both involved in the establishment and maintenance of epigenetic gene silencing, but the data are conflicting. Multiple studies have presented evidence to support the theory that PRC2 and DNAme cooperate to achieve silencing, or alternatively that H3K27me3 and DNAme act antagonistically. Here we examine the effect loss of either PRC2 or DNA methyltransferase activity has on the placement of the reciprocal mark in mouse ES cells. We find that DNAme is acting globally to antagonize the placement of H3K27me3, in accordance with recently published results. At least 471,011 domains in the mouse genome acquire H3K27me3 when DNAme is diminished. Of these 466,563 have been shown to be fully methylated in wildtype ES cells, indicating the effects of DNAme on H3K27me3 are direct. In a reciprocal experiment, we examine the effect loss of PRC2 has on the placement of DNAme. In contrast to the global antagonism DNAme has on the placement of H3K27me3, loss of H3K27me3 has a modest effect on DNAme, with only 4% of genes undergoing changes in DNAme, including 861 showing increases and 552 showing losses of overall DNAme. We anticipate that integrating genomic datasets where the effect of loss of a particular epigenetic mark has on the placement of other marks will help elucidate the rules governing epigenetic regulation and what role coordinate regulation of epigenetic marks plays in development and disease.

[1]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Dnmt3a-Dependent Nonpromoter DNA Methylation Facilitates Transcription of Neurogenic Genes , 2010, Science.

[2]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  DNA methylation and SETDB1/H3K9me3 regulate predominantly distinct sets of genes, retroelements, and chimeric transcripts in mESCs. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[3]  Lee E. Edsall,et al.  Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences , 2009, Nature.

[4]  David R. Kelley,et al.  Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[5]  Stormy J. Chamberlain,et al.  The Murine Polycomb Group Protein Eed Is Required for Global Histone H3 Lysine-27 Methylation , 2005, Current Biology.

[6]  S. Robson,et al.  Nucleosome-Interacting Proteins Regulated by DNA and Histone Methylation , 2010, Cell.

[7]  Brian J. Stevenson,et al.  Global DNA hypomethylation coupled to repressive chromatin domain formation and gene silencing in breast cancer. , 2012, Genome research.

[8]  Vijay K. Tiwari,et al.  DNA-binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions , 2011, Nature.

[9]  W. Huber,et al.  which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. MAnorm: a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets , 2011 .

[10]  Kelly M. McGarvey,et al.  DNA methylation and complete transcriptional silencing of cancer genes persist after depletion of EZH2. , 2007, Cancer research.

[11]  Aaron R. Quinlan,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Genome Analysis Bedtools: a Flexible Suite of Utilities for Comparing Genomic Features , 2022 .

[12]  P. Collas,et al.  Immunoprecipitation of methylated DNA. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[13]  I. Henderson,et al.  Epigenetic inheritance in plants , 2007, Nature.

[14]  D. Botstein,et al.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Terry Magnuson,et al.  Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 Is Dispensable for Maintenance of Embryonic Stem Cell Pluripotency , 2008, Stem cells.

[16]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Generation of mice from wild-type and targeted ES cells by nuclear cloning , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[17]  Lior Pachter,et al.  Sequence Analysis , 2020, Definitions.

[18]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation uncovers an interdependence between methylation and transcription , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[19]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells , 2007, Nature.

[20]  T. Magnuson,et al.  Cell and tissue requirements for the gene eed during mouse gastrulation and organogenesis , 2001, Genesis.

[21]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Histone H2A.Z and DNA methylation are mutually antagonistic chromatin marks , 2008, Nature.

[22]  Dirk Schübeler,et al.  Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP). , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[23]  James A. Cuff,et al.  A Bivalent Chromatin Structure Marks Key Developmental Genes in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2006, Cell.

[24]  A. Gnirke,et al.  Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for comparative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  D. Carpenter,et al.  N-Ethyl-N-nitrosourea-induced prenatally lethal mutations define at least two complementation groups within the embryonic ectoderm development (eed) locus in mouse Chromosome 7 , 2004, Mammalian Genome.

[26]  M. Pellegrini,et al.  Genome-wide High-Resolution Mapping and Functional Analysis of DNA Methylation in Arabidopsis , 2006, Cell.

[27]  Bradley E. Bernstein,et al.  GC-Rich Sequence Elements Recruit PRC2 in Mammalian ES Cells , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[28]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Role of the polycomb protein EED in the propagation of repressive histone marks , 2009, Nature.

[29]  Jun Song,et al.  CEAS: cis-regulatory element annotation system , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  M. Barton,et al.  Analysis of epigenetic alterations to chromatin during development , 2009, Genesis.

[31]  Kelly M. McGarvey,et al.  A stem cell–like chromatin pattern may predispose tumor suppressor genes to DNA hypermethylation and heritable silencing , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[32]  F. P. Villena,et al.  Genome imprinting regulated by the mouse Polycomb group protein Eed , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[33]  F. Berger,et al.  Convergent evolution of genomic imprinting in plants and mammals. , 2007, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[34]  Jürg Bähler,et al.  Arginine methylation at histone H3R2 controls deposition of H3K4 trimethylation , 2007, Nature.

[35]  R. Lister SP14 Genome-Wide High-Resolution Mapping and Functional Analysis of DNA Methylation , 2007 .

[36]  T. Borodina,et al.  Transcriptome analysis by strand-specific sequencing of complementary DNA , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[37]  W R Pearson,et al.  Comparison of DNA sequences with protein sequences. , 1997, Genomics.

[38]  N. Friedman,et al.  Single-Nucleosome Mapping of Histone Modifications in S. cerevisiae , 2005, PLoS biology.

[39]  A. Probst,et al.  Epigenetic inheritance during the cell cycle , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[40]  Gangning Liang,et al.  Frequent switching of Polycomb repressive marks and DNA hypermethylation in the PC3 prostate cancer cell line , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells , 2008, Nature.

[42]  H. Cedar,et al.  Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[43]  Jeannie T. Lee,et al.  Antagonism between DNA and H3K27 Methylation at the Imprinted Rasgrf1 Locus , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[44]  Zohar Yakhini,et al.  Polycomb-mediated methylation on Lys27 of histone H3 pre-marks genes for de novo methylation in cancer , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[45]  Christoph Bock,et al.  Sequential ChIP-bisulfite sequencing enables direct genome-scale investigation of chromatin and DNA methylation cross-talk , 2012, Genome research.

[46]  P. Laird,et al.  Epigenetic stem cell signature in cancer , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[47]  En Li,et al.  Suv 39 h-Mediated Histone H 3 Lysine 9 Methylation Directs DNA Methylation to Major Satellite Repeats at Pericentric Heterochromatin , 2003 .

[48]  Clifford A. Meyer,et al.  Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) , 2008, Genome Biology.

[49]  Timothy J. Durham,et al.  "Systematic" , 1966, Comput. J..

[50]  Lee E. Edsall,et al.  Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[51]  Mitsuhiro Nakamura,et al.  Cell cycle-dependent accumulation of histone H3.3 and euchromatic histone modifications in pericentromeric heterochromatin in response to a decrease in DNA methylation levels. , 2010, Experimental cell research.

[52]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome , 2009, Genome Biology.

[53]  T. Bestor,et al.  Eukaryotic cytosine methyltransferases. , 2005, Annual review of biochemistry.

[54]  A. Probst,et al.  Distinct regulation of histone H3 methylation at lysines 27 and 9 by CpG methylation in Arabidopsis , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[55]  D. Zilberman,et al.  Genome-Wide Evolutionary Analysis of Eukaryotic DNA Methylation , 2010, Science.