Indicators predicting use of mental health services in Piedmont, Italy.

BACKGROUND Since the 1978 Italian reform, an integrated network of community mental health services has been introduced. With few exceptions, research on determinants of mental health service use at the district level has focused on inpatient activities and social deprivation indicators. The European Psychiatric Care Assessment Team (EPCAT) standardized methodology allows for an evidence-based comparison of mental health systems between geographical areas. AIMS To compare service provision and utilization between local catchment areas; to explore quantitative relationships between residential and community service use and socio-demographic indicators at the ecological level. METHODS The European Socio-demographic Schedule (ESDS) was used to describe area characteristics, and the European Service Mapping Schedule (ESMS) to measure service provision and utilization in 18 catchment areas in Piedmont. RESULTS Substantial variation in service use emerged. Acute hospital bed occupancy rates were lower in areas with more intensive community continuing care service users and with a smaller percentage of the population living alone. The non-acute hospital bed occupancy rate was directly related to the percentage of the population living alone or in overcrowded conditions, and to the level of mobile continuing care service users. Community continuing care service use was highest in areas with a larger percentage of the population living alone. DISCUSSION Multiple regression models explained between 48 and 55% of the variation in inpatient and community service use between areas. Relationships based on ecological characteristics do not necessarily apply to the individual. This level of assessment, however, is necessary in evaluating mental health policy and service systems, and in allocating resources. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE The distribution of mental health care resources should be weighted in terms of indicators of social deprivation shown to be important predictors of both inpatient and community service use, as these are likely to be related. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES To ensure horizontal equity in access to mental health care, particularly for people with severe mental illness, evaluation of mental health policy should be based on a concurrent evidence-based assessment of the organization and use of both residential and community services, in relation to area level indicators of social deprivation. IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH Cross-national research using an internationally standardized methodology should consider the influence of the social network independently of other socio-economic indicators, to verify the relative importance of this in predicting service use in southern and in northern European countries.

[1]  W. Eaton,et al.  Absence of social networks, social support and health services utilization , 1998, Psychological Medicine.

[2]  R. Kessler,et al.  Unmet Need in Psychiatry: Comparing data on mental health service use between countries , 2000 .

[3]  L. Burti,et al.  Italian psychiatric reform 20 plus years after , 2001, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[4]  M. Sutton Vertical and horizontal aspects of socio-economic inequity in general practitioner contacts in Scotland. , 2002, Health economics.

[5]  C. Palazzi,et al.  Mental health care in Piedmont: a description of its structure and components using a new technology for service assessment , 2000, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[6]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[7]  C. Barbui,et al.  Antidepressant drug prescribing in Italy, 2000: analysis of a general practice database , 2001, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[8]  C. Brewin,et al.  Defining mental health needs , 1992 .

[9]  T A Sheldon,et al.  An Index of Need for Psychiatric Services based on In-patient Utilisation , 1996, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[10]  H. Goldman,et al.  Organizing mental health services: an evidence-based approach. , 2000, The journal of mental health policy and economics.

[11]  L. Salvador-Carulla,et al.  Description and classification of mental health services: a European perspective , 1998, European Psychiatry.

[12]  G. Thornicroft,et al.  Social Networks and Mental Health Service Utilisation - a Literature Review , 1998, The International journal of social psychiatry.

[13]  G. Shepherd,et al.  Relation between bed use, social deprivation, and overall bed availability in acute adult psychiatric units, and alternative residential options: a cross sectional survey, one day census data, and staff interviews , 1997, BMJ.

[14]  P. McGuffin,et al.  Socio-economic factors that predict psychiatric admissions at a local level , 1999, Psychological Medicine.

[15]  G. Glover How much English health authorities are allocated for mental health care , 1999, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[16]  J. Dekker,et al.  Social deprivation and psychiatric service use for different diagnostic groups. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[17]  B Jarman,et al.  Predicting psychiatric admission rates. , 1992, BMJ.

[18]  J. Beecham,et al.  Introduction: assessing mental health in Europe. , 2000, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Supplementum.

[19]  S. Johnson,et al.  The European Service Mapping Schedule (ESMS): development of an instrumentfor the description and classificationof mental health services , 2000, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[20]  P. Sedgwick,et al.  Relatives of patients with severe psychotic disorders: Factors that influence contact frequency , 2001, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[21]  Gro Harlem Brundtland,et al.  Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope , 2001 .

[22]  K Buckingham,et al.  Sociodemographic and morbidity indicators of need in relation to the use of community health services: observational study , 1997, BMJ.

[23]  Bert N. Uchino,et al.  The relationship between social support and physiological processes: a review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  M. Tansella,et al.  A conceptual framework for mental health services: the matrix model , 1998, Psychological Medicine.

[25]  R. Rosenheck,et al.  The effects of marital dissolution and marital quality on health and health service use among women. , 1999, Medical care.

[26]  A. Delgado,et al.  Psychosocial and health belief variables associated with frequent attendance in primary care , 1999, Psychological Medicine.

[27]  T. Becker Psychiatric Reform in Italy—How does it Work in Piedmont? , 1985, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[28]  K. Lefevre,et al.  The Camden Schizophrenia Surveys , 1996, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[29]  F. Creed,et al.  Social Deprivation and Psychiatric Admission Rates Among Different Diagnostic Groups , 1995, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[30]  M. Leese,et al.  More severe mental illness is more concentrated in deprived areas , 1999, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[31]  G. de Girolamo,et al.  The Italian Psychiatric Reform. A 20-year perspective. , 2000, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[32]  G. Glover,et al.  A needs index for mental health care , 1998, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[33]  Boris OGUIBENINE Evidence-based mental health policy: Acritical appraisal , 2003, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[34]  S. Hülsmann,et al.  Provision of services for people with schizophrenia in five European regions , 2002, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[35]  P. Tyrer,et al.  Importance of local differences in comparing hospital and community psychiatric services. , 1997, Epidemiologia e psichiatria sociale.

[36]  J. Beecham,et al.  The European Socio‐Demographic Schedule (ESDS): rationale, principles and development , 2000, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Supplementum.

[37]  E. Robinson,et al.  More Deprived Areas Need Greater Resources for Mental Health , 2003, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[38]  A. de Jong,et al.  Development of the International Classification of Mental Health Care (ICMHC) , 2000, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[39]  W. Jones,et al.  Small Area Variation in the Utilization of Mental Health Services: Implications for Health Planning and Allocation of Resources , 1995, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[40]  G. Thornicroft Social Deprivation and Rates of Treated Mental Disorder , 1991, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[41]  Sonia Johnson,et al.  Patterns of mental health service utilisation in Italy and Spain , 2005, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[42]  M. Tansella,et al.  Urban–rural differences in the associations between social deprivation and psychiatric service utilization in schizophrenia and all diagnoses: a case-register study in Northern Italy , 1993, Psychological Medicine.

[43]  G. de Girolamo,et al.  Residential care in Italy , 2002, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[44]  P. Yellowlees,et al.  The Relationship between Social Factors and Frequent Use of Psychiatric Services , 1995, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[45]  C. Barbui,et al.  Cross-sectional Database Analysis of Antidepressant Prescribing in Italy , 2003, Journal of clinical psychopharmacology.

[46]  A. Barbato Psychiatry in Transition: Outcomes of Mental Health Policy Shift in Italy , 1998, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[47]  J. Vessey,et al.  Patterns of mental health service utilization. , 1996, Archives of general psychiatry.

[48]  Leonard L. Russo,et al.  Reform said or done? The case of Emilia-Romagna within the Italian psychiatric context. , 1997, The American journal of psychiatry.

[49]  R. Mollica,et al.  Surviving without the asylum. An overview of the studies on the Italian reform movement. , 1989, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.