Performance of Different Proxy Concepts in UMTS Networks

It is well known that the large round trip time and the highly variable delay in a cellular network may degrade the performance of TCP. Many concepts have been proposed to improve this situation, including performance enhancing proxies (PEPs). One important class of PEPs are split connection proxies, which terminate a connection from a server in the Internet in a host close to the Radio Access Network (RAN) and establish a second connection towards the mobile User Equipment (UE). This connection splitting can be done either purely on the transport layer (TCP proxy) or on the application layer (HTTP proxy in the case of web traffic). While it is clear that an application layer proxy also infers the splitting of an underlying transport layer connection, the performance of applications may be essentially different for both approaches. In this paper, we first study the general impact of a split connection proxy on TCP bulk data transfer. We then focus on the case of web traffic and investigate the TCP connection behavior of the Mozilla web browser. Based on this, we study the performance of TCP and HTTP proxies in UMTS networks under different scenarios and for different HTTP configurations.

[1]  Rajiv Chakravorty,et al.  WWW performance over GPRS , 2002, 4th International Workshop on Mobile and Wireless Communications Network.

[2]  Roy T. Fielding,et al.  Hypertext Transfer Protocol - HTTP/1.1 , 1997, RFC.

[3]  Suresh Singh,et al.  M-TCP: TCP for mobile cellular networks , 1997, CCRV.

[4]  Michael Meyer,et al.  Performance evaluation of a TCP proxy in WCDMA networks , 2003, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[5]  Hiroshi Inamura,et al.  TCP over Second (2.5G) and Third (3G) Generation Wireless Networks , 2003, RFC.

[6]  M. Necker,et al.  IP-Packet Service Time Distributions in UMTS Radio Access Networks , 2004 .

[7]  Vern Paxson,et al.  End-to-end Internet packet dynamics , 1997, SIGCOMM '97.

[8]  Gabriel Montenegro,et al.  Performance Enhancing Proxies Intended to Mitigate Link-Related Degradations , 2001, RFC.

[9]  T. Schwabe,et al.  Performance improvements for TCP in mobile networks with high packet delay variations , 2001 .

[10]  Joel Cartwright,et al.  Practical experience with TCP over GPRS , 2002, Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM '02. IEEE.

[11]  Marc Necker,et al.  The Sensitivity of TCP to Sudden Delay Variations in Mobile Networks , 2004, NETWORKING.

[12]  Mun Choon Chan,et al.  TCP/IP Performance over 3G Wireless Links with Rate and Delay Variation , 2005, Wirel. Networks.

[13]  R. Yavatkar,et al.  Improving End-to-End Performance of TCP over Mobile Internetworks , 1994, 1994 First Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[14]  B. R. Badrinath,et al.  I-TCP: indirect TCP for mobile hosts , 1995, Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

[15]  Srinivasan Seshan,et al.  Improving reliable transport and handoff performance in cellular wireless networks , 1995, Wirel. Networks.