The Processing of Stereoscopic Information in Human Visual Cortex: Psychophysical and Electrophysiological Evidence

Three-dimensional depth perception relies in part on the binocular fusion of horizontally disparate stimuli presented to the left and right eye. The mammalian visual system offers a unique possibility to study electrophysiologically cortical neuronal mechanisms: since the input of the two eyes remains separated up to the level of the visual cortex, evoked potential components that are generated exclusively by cortical structures may be explored when dynamic random-dot stereograms (dRDS) are presented. In a series of independent studies, we determined the scalp topography of dRDS evoked brain activity in different groups of healthy subjects, and we found consistent results. Major differences between stereoscopic and contrast evoked brain activity are seen in the strength of the potential fields as well as in their topography. Our findings suggest that there are fewer neurons in the human visual cortex that are responsive to horizontal disparity, and that higher visual areas like V2 are more engaged with stereoscopic processing than the primary visual cortex. On the other hand, component latencies of evoked brain activity show no effect signifying that the binocular information flow to the visual cortex has a similar time course for both the processing of contrast information and of dRDS stimuli. We could also verify that healthy subjects can learn to perceive 3D structure contained in dRDS. Changes in perceptual ability as measured with psychophysical tests are paralleled by systematic alterations in the topography of stereoscopically evoked potential fields. Stereoscopic VEP recordings may also be of clinical use: in patients with selectively disturbed depth perception but normal visual acuity there is a high correlation between clinical symptoms, perceptual deficiency, and altered VEP amplitudes and latencies.

[1]  Vieth Ueber die Richtung der Augen , 1818 .

[2]  C. Wheatstone XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[3]  P. Panum Physiologische Untersuchungen über das Sehen mit zwei Augen , 1858 .

[4]  D. Hubel,et al.  Stereoscopic Vision in Macaque Monkey: Cells sensitive to Binocular Depth in Area 18 of the Macaque Monkey Cortex , 1970, Nature.

[5]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[6]  P. O. Bishop Neurophysiology of Binocular Single Vision and Stereopsis , 1973 .

[7]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[8]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Sustained cortical potentials evoked in humans by binocularly correlated, uncorrelated and disparate dynamic random-dot stimuli , 1978, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  B Julesz,et al.  Binocular stimulation reveals cortical components of the human visual evoked potential. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  G. Baumgartner,et al.  Development of stereopsis and cortical binocularity in human infants: electrophysiological evidence. , 1981, Science.

[12]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Effects of practice and the separation of test targets on foveal and peripheral stereoacuity , 1983, Vision Research.

[13]  T. Poggio,et al.  The analysis of stereopsis. , 1984, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  W. Skrandies,et al.  [Stereovision in random dot pattern VECP: normal findings and clinical use]. , 1985, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[15]  W. Skrandies,et al.  Stereoscopic stimuli activate different cortical neurones in man: electrophysiological evidence. , 1985, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[16]  Wolfgang Skrandies,et al.  Visual persistence of stereoscopic stimuli: Electric brain activity without perceptual correlate , 1987, Vision Research.

[17]  W Skrandies,et al.  Contrast and stereoscopic visual stimuli yield lateralized scalp potential fields associated with different neural generators. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  A J O'Toole,et al.  Learning to See Random-Dot Stereograms , 1992, Perception.

[19]  T Poggio,et al.  Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. , 1991, Science.

[20]  L K Cormack,et al.  Disparity-tuned channels of the human visual system , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[21]  Konrad Maurer,et al.  Imaging of the Brain in Psychiatry and Related Fields , 2011, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[22]  Wolfgang Skrandies Mapping of Scalp Potential Fields Elicited by Cortical Generators: The Use of Dynamic Random Dot Stereograms , 1993 .

[23]  W. Skrandies Visual information processing: topography of brain electrical activity , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[24]  W Skrandies,et al.  Sensory thresholds and neurophysiological correlates of human perceptual learning. , 1996, Spatial vision.

[25]  W. Skrandies Depth perception and evoked brain activity: The influence of horizontal disparity and visual field location , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[26]  R Perez,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying stereoscopic vision , 1998, Progress in Neurobiology.

[27]  W Skrandies,et al.  Learning to see 3-D: psychophysics and brain electrical activity. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[28]  W Skrandies,et al.  An early antecedent to modern random dot stereograms --'the secret stereoscopic writing' of Ramón y Cajal. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[29]  M. Fahle,et al.  Perceptual learning: psychophysical thresholds and electrical brain topography. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.