A new broad typology for rivers and lakes in Europe: Development and application for large-scale environmental assessments.

European countries have defined >1000 national river types and >400 national lake types to implement the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). In addition, common river and lake types have been defined within regions of Europe for intercalibrating the national classification systems for ecological status of water bodies. However, only a low proportion of national types correspond to these common intercalibration types. This causes uncertainty concerning whether the classification of ecological status is consistent across countries. Therefore, through an extensive dialogue with and data provision from all EU countries, we have developed a generic typology for European rivers and lakes. This new broad typology reflects the natural variability in the most commonly used environmental type descriptors: altitude, size and geology, as well as mean depth for lakes. These broad types capture 60-70% of all national WFD types including almost 80% of all European river and lake water bodies in almost all EU countries and can also be linked to all the common intercalibration types. The typology provides a new framework for large-scale assessments across country borders, as demonstrated with an assessment of ecological status and pressures based on European data from the 2nd set of river basin management plans. The typology can also be used for a variety of other large-scale assessments, such as reviewing and linking the water body types to habitat types under the Habitats Directive and the European Nature Information System (EUNIS), as well as comparing type-specific limit values for nutrients and other supporting quality elements across countries. Thus, the broad typology can build the basis for all scientific outputs of managerial relevance related to water body types.

[1]  M. Kelly,et al.  Nutrient criteria for surface waters under the European Water Framework Directive: Current state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  Agnieszka Kolada,et al.  Abiotic typology of Polish lakes , 2005 .

[4]  J. Padisák,et al.  Vanishing world: alkaline, saline lakes in Central Europe and their diatom assemblages , 2014 .

[5]  T. Okruszko,et al.  A multi-scale hierarchical framework for developing understanding of river behaviour to support river management , 2015, Aquatic Sciences.

[6]  S Birk,et al.  Intercalibrating classifications of ecological status: Europe's quest for common management objectives for aquatic ecosystems. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  M. Sillanpää,et al.  Implementing the Bioeconomy on the Ground: An International Overview , 2017 .

[8]  T. Christiansen,et al.  European waters assessment of status and pressures 2018. , 2012 .

[9]  Vivi M. L. Storsletten,et al.  Beyond the Green Shift—Ecological Economics , 2018, Springer Geography.

[10]  M. Huet Biologie, profils en long et en travers des eaux courantes , 1954 .

[11]  Martin Kernan,et al.  Assessing the ecological status in the context of the European Water Framework Directive: where do we go now? , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  Nathalie Liamine,et al.  European Environment Agency , 2002 .

[13]  E. Naumann Grundzüge der regionalen Limnologie , 1933, Nature.

[14]  S. Cheshmedjiev,et al.  Revision of river & lake typology in Bulgaria within ecoregion 12 (Pontic province) and ecoregion 7 (Eastern Balkans) according to the Water Framework Directive. , 2010 .

[15]  A. N. Strahler Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. , 1952 .

[16]  L. Snoj,et al.  Metadata to the MARS spatial database , 2017 .

[17]  B. Skjelbred,et al.  Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report: Northern Lake Phytoplankton ecological assessment methods , 2014 .

[18]  Die Binnengewässer Mitteleuropas , 1926 .

[19]  Anne Lyche Solheim,et al.  A hitchhiker's guide to European lake ecological assessment and intercalibration , 2015 .

[20]  David Trigg,et al.  Developing an optimal river typology for biological elements within the Water Framework Directive. , 2005, Water research.

[21]  L. G.-Tóth,et al.  Which factors affect phytoplankton biomass in shallow eutrophic lakes? , 2013, Hydrobiologia.

[22]  N. Prat,et al.  Defining River Types in a Mediterranean Area: A Methodology for the Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive , 2004, Environmental management.

[23]  M. Delong,et al.  The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time , 2006 .

[24]  S. Szabó,et al.  Phytoplankton-based shallow lake types in the Carpathian basin: Steps towards a bottom-up typology , 2014 .

[25]  Sebastian Birk,et al.  Intercalibration of aquatic ecological assessment methods in the European Union: Lessons learned and way forward , 2014 .

[26]  F. Salerno,et al.  Characterization of the Italian lake-types and identification of their reference sites using anthropogenic pressure factors , 2005 .

[27]  L. Botosanéanu,et al.  Problèmes et méthodes de la classification et de la zonation écologique des eaux courantes, considerées surtout du point de vue faunistique: Avec 18 figures dans le texte et en supplément , 1963 .

[28]  S. Birk,et al.  Ex uno plures – Defining different types of very large rivers in Europe to foster solid aquatic bio-assessment , 2019 .

[29]  Fehér János,et al.  European Freshwater Ecosystem Assessment: Cross-walk between the Water Framework Directive and Habitats Directive types, status and pressures , 2015 .

[30]  Andrea Buffagni,et al.  Bringing European river quality into line: an exercise to intercalibrate macro-invertebrate classification methods , 2011, Hydrobiologia.

[31]  A. Thienemann Die Binnengewässer Mitteleuropas : eine limnologische Einführung , 1925 .

[32]  T. Kairesalo,et al.  A typology and ecological classification system for finnish lakes : applicability of the ECOFRAME scheme , 2005 .