The publication of cancer research papers in high impact journals

Examines a set of over 27,000 UK papers in cancer research in order to identify the individual factors that influence the impact category of the journals in which they are published, using multiple regression analysis. The most important independent variables that have a positive effect are the numbers of authors and funding bodies, the research level (from clinical to basic), and the presence of certain universities, or of the USA, in the address field. Inter‐lab co‐operation was shown to have a negative effect on journal impact category, as was international co‐authorship. It is because such partnerships usually involve more authors and funding for the research that they are perceived to lead to higher impact work. There is also a tendency for papers to be published in higher impact journals in later years, probably because of market forces, which means that such journals will tend to expand.

[1]  Gabriel Pinski,et al.  Structure of the Biomedical Literature , 1976, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Chiara Palmerini.  University Funding to Be Tied to Performance , 1999, Science.

[3]  Grant Lewison,et al.  Reviewers’ and editors’ perceptions of submitted manuscripts with different numbers of authors, addresses and funding sources , 1999, J. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Scandinavia: A Bibliometric Approach , 2000, Scientometrics.

[5]  E. Breeze,et al.  Design, objectives, and lessons from a pilot 25 year follow up re-survey of survivors in the Whitehall study of London Civil Servants. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[6]  Grant Lewison,et al.  Bibliometric indicators to assist the peer review process in grant decisions , 1999 .

[7]  Harry Hemingway,et al.  Evidence based cardiology: psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Systematic review of prospective cohort studies. , 1999, BMJ.

[8]  G. Lewison.  Gastroenterology research in the United Kingdom: funding sources and impact , 1998, Gut.

[9]  G Williams,et al.  Misleading, unscientific, and unjust: the United Kingdom's research assessment exercise , 1998, BMJ.

[10]  Francis Narin,et al.  Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers , 1991, Scientometrics.

[11]  M. Marmot,et al.  When does cardiovascular risk start? Past and present socioeconomic circumstances and risk factors in adulthood. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[12]  M. Bobák,et al.  International comparators and poverty and health in Europe , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Vinton G. Cerf.  Research Pays Off , 1996, Science.