Design features that affect the maneuverability of wheelchairs and scooters.

OBJECTIVE To determine the minimum space required for wheeled mobility device users to perform 4 maneuverability tasks and to investigate the impact of selected design attributes on space. DESIGN Case series. SETTING University laboratory, Veterans Affairs research facility, vocational training center, and a national wheelchair sport event. PARTICIPANTS The sample of convenience included manual wheelchair (MWC; n=109), power wheelchair (PWC; n=100), and scooter users (n=14). INTERVENTION A mock environment was constructed to create passageways to form an L-turn, 360 degrees -turn in place, and a U-turn with and without a barrier. Passageway openings were increased in 5-cm increments until the user could successfully perform each task without hitting the walls. Structural dimensions of the device and user were collected using an electromechanical probe. Mobility devices were grouped into categories based on design features and compared using 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc pairwise Bonferroni-corrected tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Minimum passageway widths for the 4 maneuverability tasks. RESULTS Ultralight MWCs with rear axles posterior to the shoulder had the shortest lengths and required the least amount of space compared with all other types of MWCs (P<.05). Mid-wheel-drive PWCs required the least space for the 360 degrees -turn in place compared with front-wheel-drive and rear-wheel-drive PWCs (P<.01) but performed equally as well as front-wheel-drive models on all other turning tasks. PWCs with seat functions required more space to perform the tasks. CONCLUSIONS Between 10% and 100% of users would not be able to maneuver in spaces that meet current Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities specifications. This study provides data that can be used to support wheelchair prescription and home modifications and to update standards to improve the accessibility of public areas.

[1]  Tae-Gyung Kang,et al.  Mobility Device Use in the United States , 2003 .

[2]  Rory A. Cooper A perspective on the ultralight wheelchair revolution , 1996 .

[3]  Jean Dansereau,et al.  Powered Tilt/Recline Systems: Why and How Are They Used? , 2003, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[4]  Rosemarie Cooper,et al.  RESNA Position on the Application of Tilt, Recline, and Elevating Legrests for Wheelchairs , 2009, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[5]  C E Beekman,et al.  Energy cost of propulsion in standard and ultralight wheelchairs in people with spinal cord injuries. , 1999, Physical therapy.

[6]  M. Laplante,et al.  MOBILITY DEVICE USE IN THE UNITED STATES: DISABILITY STATISTICS REPORT , 2000 .

[7]  Donald R. Miller,et al.  Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[8]  Edward Steinfeld,et al.  Accessible Buildings for People with Walking and Reaching Limitations. , 1979 .

[9]  Jacquelin Perry,et al.  Effect of Fore-Aft Seat Position on Shoulder Demands During Wheelchair Propulsion:Part2. An Electromyographic Analysis , 2005, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[10]  R.A. Cooper,et al.  Engineering Better Wheelchairs to Enhance Community Participation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  J. W. Sparling,et al.  Parent/Caregiver Perspectives on the Use of Power Wheelchairs , 1996 .

[12]  Shirley G Fitzgerald,et al.  Assessing the influence of wheelchair technology on perception of participation in spinal cord injury. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  Dan Ding,et al.  Usage of tilt-in-space, recline, and elevation seating functions in natural environment of wheelchair users. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  David Feathers,et al.  An anthropometric study of manual and powered wheelchair users , 2004 .

[15]  M. M. DiGiovine,et al.  User assessment of manual wheelchair ride comfort and ergonomics. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.