Blinded with science: Trivial graphs and formulas increase ad persuasiveness and belief in product efficacy

The appearance of being scientific can increase persuasiveness. Even trivial cues can create such an appearance of a scientific basis. In our studies, including simple elements, such as graphs (Studies 1–2) or a chemical formula (Study 3), increased belief in a medication’s efficacy. This appears to be due to the association of such elements with science, rather than increased comprehensibility, use of visuals, or recall. Belief in science moderates the persuasive effect of graphs, such that people who have a greater belief in science are more affected by the presence of graphs (Study 2). Overall, the studies contribute to past research by demonstrating that even trivial elements can increase public persuasion despite their not truly indicating scientific expertise or objective support.

[1]  B. Gastel.  Presenting Science to the Public , 1959, Nature.

[2]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions , 1987 .

[3]  Alan D. Castel,et al.  Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning , 2008, Cognition.

[4]  Michael F. Dahlstrom.  The Role of Causality in Information Acceptance in Narratives: An Example From Science Communication , 2010, Commun. Res..

[5]  Carolyn R. Miller.  The Presumptions of Expertise: The Role of Ethos in Risk Analysis , 2004 .

[6]  R. Harris.  Rhetoric of Science. , 1991 .

[7]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1986 .

[8]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude? , 2000 .

[9]  R. Merton.  The Normative Structure of Science , 1973 .

[10]  Michael D. Slater,et al.  Scientese and Ambiguous Citations in the Selling of Unproven Medical Treatments , 2004, Health communication.

[11]  Edward Rolf Tufte,et al.  The visual display of quantitative information , 1985 .

[12]  H. Constantinides.  The duality of scientific ethos: Deep and surface structures , 2001 .

[13]  Steven Miller,et al.  Public understanding of science at the crossroads , 2001 .

[14]  Richard Staelin,et al.  The Information Processing of Pictures in Print Advertisements , 1983 .

[15]  Introduction. Scientific Ethos: Authority, Authorship, and Trust in the Sciences , 2003 .

[16]  Deena Skolnick Weisberg,et al.  The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Lawrence J. Prelli,et al.  A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse , 1989 .

[18]  R. Abelson.  Statistics As Principled Argument , 1995 .

[19]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Susceptibility to Persuasive Appeals as a Function of Source Credibility and Prior Experience With the Attitude Object , 2004 .

[20]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual Versus Verbal Information Processing , 1985 .

[21]  Linda M. Scott,et al.  Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric , 1994 .