Conceptual development about motion and force in elementary and middle school students

Methods of physics education research were applied to find what kinds of changes in 4th, 6th, and 8th grade student understanding of motion can occur and at what age. Such findings are necessary for the physics community to effectively discharge its role in advising and assisting pre-college physics education. Prior to and after instruction the students were asked to carefully describe several demonstrated accelerated motions. Most pre-instruction descriptions were of the direction of motion only. After instruction, many more of the students gave descriptions of the motion as continuously changing. Student responses to the diagnostic and to the activity materials revealed the presence of a third “snapshot” view of motion not discussed in the literature. The 4th and 6th grade students gave similar pre-instructional descriptions of the motion, but the 4th grade students did not exhibit the same degree of change in descriptions after instruction. Our findings suggest that students as early as 6th grade can d...

[1]  J. Piaget.  The Child's Conception of Physical Causality , 1927 .

[2]  L. McDermott,et al.  Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension , 1981 .

[3]  J. Minstrell.  Explaining the ’’at rest’’ condition of an object , 1982 .

[4]  G. Erickson,et al.  Students' Conceptions about the Vector Characteristics of Three Physics Concepts. , 1984 .

[5]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Tools for Scientific Thinking: Microcomputer-Based Laboratories for the Naive Science Learner. , 1985 .

[6]  D. Dykstra,et al.  Science education in elementary school: Some observations , 1986 .

[7]  R. Thornton,et al.  Tools for scientific thinking-microcomputer-based laboratories for physics teaching , 1987 .

[8]  D. Dykstra.  Author's response to comments of cronin, charron, and espinet , 1987 .

[9]  Heather Brasell,et al.  The effect of real‐time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity , 1987 .

[10]  Roger T. Cross,et al.  Speed, Education and Children as Pedestrians: a Cognitive Change Approach to a Potentially Dangerous Naive Concept. , 1988 .

[11]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Learning motion concepts using real‐time microcomputer‐based laboratory tools , 1990 .

[12]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Change in Teaching Mathematics: A Case Study , 1991 .

[13]  Deborah Schifter,et al.  Reconstructing Mathematics Education: Stories of Teachers Meeting the Challenge of Reform , 1992 .

[14]  C. Boyle,et al.  Studying conceptual change in learning physics , 1992 .

[15]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[16]  Tim O'Shea,et al.  The conception of force and motion of students aged between 10 and 15 years: an interview study designed to guide instruction , 1994 .

[17]  Jr Dewey I Dykstra.  Teaching Introductory Physics to College Students , 1996 .

[18]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[19]  Jim Minstrell.  The role of the teacher in making sense of classroom experiences and effecting better learning , 2001 .

[20]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: “Physics Education Research—The Key to Student Learning” , 2001 .

[21]  Why Teach Kinematics? An Examination of the Teaching of Kinematics and Force II , 2002 .