Supporting environmental modelling with Taverna workflows, web services and desktop grid technology

Ecosystem functioning, climate change, and multiple interactions among biogeochemical cycles, climate system, site conditions and land use options are leading-edge topics in recent environmental modelling. Terrestrial ecosystem models are widely used to support carbon sequestration and ecosystem studies under various ecological circumstances. Our team uses the Biome-BGC model (Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, University of Montana), and develops an improved model version of it, called Biome-BGC MuSo. Both the original and the improved model estimate the ecosystem scale storage and fluxes of energy, carbon, nitrogen and water, controlled by various physical and biological processes on a daily time-scale. Web services were also developed and integrated with parallel processing desktop grid technology. Taverna workflow management system was used to build up and carry out elaborated workflows like seamless data flow to model simulation, Monte Carlo experiment, model sensitivity analysis, model-data fusion, estimation of ecosystem service indicators or extensive spatial modelling. Straightforward management of complex data analysis tasks, organized into appropriately documented, shared and reusable scientific workflows enables researchers to carry out detailed and scientifically challenging 'in silico' experiments and applications that could open new directions in ecosystem research and in a broader sense it supports progress in environmental modelling. The workflow approach built upon these web services allows even the most complicated computations to be initiated without the need of programming skills and deep understanding of model structure and initialization. The developments enable a wider array of scientists to perform ecosystem scale simulations, and to perform analyses not previously possible due to high complexity and computational demand.

[1]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  Common motifs in scientific workflows: An empirical analysis , 2012, 2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on E-Science.

[2]  Matthew B Jones,et al.  Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a data-intensive science. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  Dumitru Roman,et al.  Model as a Service (MaaS) , 2008 .

[4]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Analyzing the causes and spatial pattern of the European 2003 carbon flux anomaly using seven models , 2007 .

[5]  I. Kühn,et al.  Ecoinformatics and global change – an overdue liaison , 2011 .

[6]  Bertram Ludäscher,et al.  Trends in Use of Scientific Workflows 1 7 th International Digital Curation Conference December 2011 Trends in Use of Scientific Workflows : Insights from a Public Repository and Recommendations for Best Practices , 2011 .

[7]  Geoffrey C. Fox,et al.  Examining the Challenges of Scientific Workflows , 2007, Computer.

[8]  Péter Kacsuk,et al.  SZTAKI Desktop Grid: a Modular and Scalable Way of Building Large Computing Grids , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium.

[9]  G. Churkina,et al.  Development of the Biome-BGC model for simulation of managed herbaceous ecosystems , 2012 .

[10]  Markus Erhard,et al.  Analyzing the Ecosystem Carbon Dynamics of Four European Coniferous Forests Using a Biogeochemistry Model , 2003, Ecosystems.

[11]  Roy T. Fielding,et al.  Principled design of the modern Web architecture , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2000 the New Millennium.

[12]  Dubois Gregoire,et al.  eHabitat: A Contribution to the Model Web for Habitat Assessments and Ecological Forecasting , 2011 .

[13]  M. Williams,et al.  Improving land surface models with FLUXNET data , 2009 .

[14]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  The Taverna workflow suite: designing and executing workflows of Web Services on the desktop, web or in the cloud , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  G. Churkina,et al.  Parameter estimation and validation of the terrestrial ecosystem model Biome-BGC using eddy-covariance flux measurements , 2009 .

[16]  Benjamin W. Heumann,et al.  Interactions between nitrogen deposition, land cover conversion, and climate change determine the contemporary carbon balance of Europe , 2010 .

[17]  P. Ciais,et al.  Carbon accumulation in European forests , 2008 .

[18]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Carbon–climate feedbacks: a review of model and observation based estimates , 2010 .

[19]  Péter Kacsuk,et al.  SZTAKI Desktop Grid (SZDG): A Flexible and Scalable Desktop Grid System , 2009, Journal of Grid Computing.

[20]  G. Churkina,et al.  Optimization and evaluation of the ANTHRO-BGC model for winter crops in Europe , 2011 .

[21]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .

[22]  Péter Kacsuk,et al.  GenWrapper: A generic wrapper for running legacy applications on desktop grids , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing.

[23]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  BioCatalogue: a universal catalogue of web services for the life sciences , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[25]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs , 2012 .

[26]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[27]  Alex Hardisty,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) A decadal view of biodiversity informatics : challenges and priorities , 2013 .