I might try it: Marketing actions to reduce consumer disgust toward insect-based food

[1]  J. Bolderdijk,et al.  Disgusting? No, just deviating from internalized norms. Understanding consumer skepticism toward sustainable food alternatives , 2021, Journal of Environmental Psychology.

[2]  Koert van Ittersum,et al.  No Way, That’s Gross! How Public Exposure Therapy Can Overcome Disgust Preventing Consumer Adoption of Sustainable Food Alternatives , 2021, Foods.

[3]  Stephanie Bryant,et al.  Desire to eat and intake of ‘insect’ containing food is increased by a written passage: The potential role of familiarity in the amelioration of novel food disgust , 2020, Appetite.

[4]  A. Wong Consumer Perceptions of Service Convenience in Hedonic and Utilitarian Retail Settings in China , 2020 .

[5]  M. Niva,et al.  Finnish consumers’ intentions to consume insect-based foods , 2020 .

[6]  Xiaoyan Deng,et al.  A Packaging Visual-Gustatory Correspondence Effect: Using Visual Packaging Design to Influence Flavor Perception and Healthy Eating Decisions , 2019 .

[7]  P. Rozin,et al.  Disgust, sushi consumption, and other predictors of acceptance of insects as food by Americans and Indians , 2019, Food Quality and Preference.

[8]  Riccardo Vecchio,et al.  Willingness to pay for insect-based food: The role of information and carrier , 2019, Food Quality and Preference.

[9]  Andreas Lieberoth,et al.  We will eat disgusting foods together – Evidence of the normative basis of Western entomophagy-disgust from an insect tasting , 2019, Food Quality and Preference.

[10]  B. Rumpold,et al.  Consumer acceptance of foods containing edible insects in Belgium two years after their introduction to the market , 2019, Journal of Insects as Food and Feed.

[11]  R. Cadario,et al.  Which healthy eating nudges work best? A meta-analysis of field experiments , 2018, Appetite.

[12]  Sankar Sen,et al.  The Cake Looks Yummy on the Shelf up There: The Interactive Effect of Retail Shelf Position and Consumers’ Personal Sense of Power on Indulgent Choice , 2018, Journal of Retailing.

[13]  D. Menozzi,et al.  Sensory‐liking Expectations and Perceptions of Processed and Unprocessed Insect Products , 2018 .

[14]  Gopal Das,et al.  The Perfect Fit: The Moderating Role of Selling Cues on Hedonic and Utilitarian Product Types , 2018, Journal of Retailing.

[15]  Bernadette Sütterlin,et al.  Perceived naturalness and evoked disgust influence acceptance of cultured meat. , 2018, Meat science.

[16]  K. Grunert,et al.  Understanding Westerners’ disgust for the eating of insects: The role of food neophobia and implicit associations , 2018 .

[17]  A. Kumar,et al.  Understanding Local Food Consumers: Theory of Planned Behavior and Segmentation Approach , 2018 .

[18]  C. Hadjichristidis,et al.  Barriers to sustainable consumption attenuated by foreign language use , 2018, Nature Sustainability.

[19]  T. Otterbring,et al.  The effects of consumer knowledge on the willingness to buy insect food: An exploratory cross-regional study in Northern and Central Europe , 2016, Food Quality and Preference.

[20]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Development and validation of the Food Disgust Scale , 2018 .

[21]  E. Haubruge,et al.  Could new information influence attitudes to foods supplemented with edible insects , 2017 .

[22]  L. Sipos,et al.  Readiness to adopt insects in Hungary: A case study , 2017 .

[23]  Davide Menozzi,et al.  Eating novel foods: An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict the consumption of an insect-based product , 2017 .

[24]  Edward Shih-Tse Wang Different Effects of Utilitarian and Hedonic Benefits of Retail Food Packaging on Perceived Product Quality and Purchase Intention , 2017 .

[25]  Anne L. Roggeveen,et al.  The Future of Retailing , 2017 .

[26]  M. Stieger,et al.  How will better products improve the sensory-liking and willingness to buy insect-based foods? , 2017, Food research international.

[27]  Ran Kivetz,et al.  The effects of promotions on hedonic versus utilitarian purchases , 2017 .

[28]  Robert Mai,et al.  Light and Pale Colors in Food Packaging: When Does This Package Cue Signal Superior Healthiness or Inferior Tastiness? , 2016 .

[29]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Effects of the degree of processing of insect ingredients in snacks on expected emotional experiences and willingness to eat , 2016 .

[30]  J. House Consumer acceptance of insect-based foods in the Netherlands: Academic and commercial implications , 2016, Appetite.

[31]  T. Giudice,et al.  The effect of communication and implicit associations on consuming insects: An experiment in Denmark and Italy , 2016, Appetite.

[32]  Markus Stieger,et al.  The influence of product preparation, familiarity and individual traits on the consumer acceptance of insects as food , 2016 .

[33]  E. Haubruge,et al.  Consumer acceptance of insect-based alternative meat products in Western countries , 2016 .

[34]  H. Steur,et al.  Emotional and sensory profiling of insect-, plant- and meat-based burgers under blind, expected and informed conditions , 2016 .

[35]  N. Lacetera,et al.  Consumer approach to insects as food: barriers and potential for consumption in Italy , 2016 .

[36]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Becoming an Insectivore: Results of an Experiment , 2016 .

[37]  A. Fischer,et al.  Tasty but nasty? Exploring the role of sensory-liking and food appropriateness in the willingness to eat unusual novel foods like insects , 2016 .

[38]  K. White,et al.  When Do Consumers Avoid Imperfections? Superficial Packaging Damage as a Contamination Cue , 2016 .

[39]  P. Frazer,et al.  Comparing Social and Intellectual Appeals to Reduce Disgust of Eating Crickets , 2015 .

[40]  C. Spence,et al.  The insectivore’s dilemma, and how to take the West out of it , 2015 .

[41]  M. Siegrist,et al.  The psychology of eating insects: A cross-cultural comparison between Germany and China , 2015 .

[42]  Jordi Sabater-Mir,et al.  Self-Policing Through Norm Internalization: A Cognitive Solution to the Tragedy of the Digital Commons in Social Networks , 2015, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[43]  W. Verbeke Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society , 2015 .

[44]  E. Haubruge,et al.  Edible insects acceptance by belgian consumers: promising attitude for entomophagy development , 2014 .

[45]  J. Boer,et al.  Motivational differences in food orientation and the choice of snacks made from lentils, locusts, seaweed or “hybrid” meat , 2013 .

[46]  J. Alba,et al.  Pleasure principles: A review of research on hedonic consumption , 2013 .

[47]  K. Reynolds,et al.  Approach and Avoidance Motivation: Investigating Hedonic Consumption in a Retail Setting , 2012 .

[48]  Stefan Hoffmann,et al.  Taste lovers versus nutrition fact seekers: How health consciousness and self‐efficacy determine the way consumers choose food products , 2012 .

[49]  Joop de Boer,et al.  Can we cut out the meat of the dish? Constructing consumer-oriented pathways towards meat substitution , 2012, Appetite.

[50]  Mei‐Fang Chen The joint moderating effect of health consciousness and healthy lifestyle on consumers’ willingness to use functional foods in Taiwan , 2011, Appetite.

[51]  Beth Vallen,et al.  The Impact of Product Name on Dieters’ and Nondieters’ Food Evaluations and Consumption , 2011 .

[52]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[53]  Kelly L. Haws,et al.  Eating with a Purpose: Consumer Response to Functional Food Health Claims in Conflicting versus Complementary Information Environments , 2009 .

[54]  M. Banaji,et al.  PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF THE IAT 1 RUNNING HEAD : PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF THE IAT Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test : III . Meta-analysis of Predictive Validity , 2006 .

[55]  Gavan J. Fitzsimons,et al.  Product Contagion: Changing Consumer Evaluations through Physical Contact with “Disgusting” Products , 2007 .

[56]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  Consumer Contamination: How Consumers React to Products Touched by Others , 2006 .

[57]  P. Pliner,et al.  “Ugh! That's disgusting!”: Identification of the characteristics of foods underlying rejections based on disgust , 2006, Appetite.

[58]  Hyeong Min Kim,et al.  Consumers' responses to price presentation formats in rebate advertisements , 2006 .

[59]  Kirk L. Wakefield,et al.  Situational price sensitivity: the role of consumption occasion, social context and income , 2003 .

[60]  R. Dhar,et al.  Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods , 2000 .

[61]  P. Pliner,et al.  Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans , 1992, Appetite.

[62]  A. Fallon,et al.  A perspective on disgust. , 1987, Psychological review.