Computer interactive interviewing in survey research

Software packages for microcomputer interactive questionnaires are becoming readily available to researchers in marketing, psychology, sociology, political science, etc. Preliminary findings suggest that the advantages of computerizing survey questionnaires generally outweigh the disadvantages. In addition, computer interactive questionnaires provide a practical means for conducting programmatic research, which includes the gamut from controls for order effects to investigations of basic psychological and social behaviors. Future studies should investigate in greater depth and with appropriate controls the strengths, limitations and comparability of the new approaches vis-a-vis traditional techniques. In these studies the contribution of various branches of psychology can be substantial.

[1]  Ralph J. DiClement,et al.  The Association of Gender, Ethnicity, and Length of Residence in the Bay Area to Adolescents' Knowledge and Attitudes about Acquired immune Deficiency Syndrome1 , 1987 .

[2]  D N Hansen,et al.  Affective reactions toward computer-based intelligence testing. , 1973, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[3]  Chapter 1 – Sample Surveys: History, Current Practice, and Future Prospects , 1983 .

[4]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Survey Research and Technological Change , 1983 .

[5]  J. H. Frey,et al.  Survey research by telephone , 1983 .

[6]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Affect in Computer-Meditated Communication: An Experiment in Synchronous Terminal-to-Terminal Discussion , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  R M Groves,et al.  Computer assisted telephone interviewing: effects on interviewers and respondents. , 1984, Public opinion quarterly.

[8]  John C. Duffy,et al.  A Comparison of Computer Interviewing Techniques and Traditional Methods in the Collection of Self-Report Alcohol Consumption Data in a Field Survey , 1984 .

[9]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Response Effects in the Electronic Survey , 1986 .

[10]  H. Skinner,et al.  Challenge of computers in psychological assessment. , 1986 .

[11]  H. Freeman Research Opportunities Related to CATI , 1983 .

[12]  Nancy Karweit,et al.  Chapter 11 – Computers in Survey Research , 1983 .

[13]  Tyzoon T. Tyebjee,et al.  Telephone Survey Methods: The State of the Art , 1979 .

[14]  Stanley Rothman,et al.  Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence and Aptitude Testing. , 1987 .

[15]  Victor Callaghan,et al.  The Market Research Terminal and Developments in Survey Research , 1986 .

[16]  Sarah L. Wilson,et al.  Automated Psychological Testing , 1982 .

[17]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. , 1986 .

[18]  Robert G. Brookshire,et al.  Using microcomputers in research , 1985 .

[19]  Dave Bartram,et al.  Automated testing: Past, present and future , 1984 .

[20]  R. W. Lucas,et al.  Psychiatrists and a Computer as Interrogators of Patients with Alcohol-Related Illnesses: A Comparison , 1977, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[21]  L. Robins,et al.  National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Its history, characteristics, and validity. , 1981, Archives of general psychiatry.

[22]  R. Perloff,et al.  Membership opinions about reorganizing APA. , 1987 .

[23]  Robert M. Groves Implications of CATI , 1983 .

[24]  Robert L. Stout New approaches to the design of computerized interviewing and testing systems , 1981 .

[25]  S. Denner Automated psychological testing: A review , 1977 .

[26]  J. L. Gedye,et al.  The automation of psychological assessment , 1969 .

[27]  D. Twedt,et al.  A Survey of Marketing Research , 1964 .

[28]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Using Electronic Mail for Data Collection in Organizational Research , 1986 .

[29]  James C. Fink,et al.  CATI's First Decade , 1983 .

[30]  A. Kohut Rating the Polls: The Views of Media Elites and the General Public , 1986 .

[31]  H. Freeman,et al.  The California Disability Survey: Design and Execution of a Computer-Assisted Telephone Study , 1981 .

[32]  Benjamin Kleinmuntz,et al.  Diagnostic interviewing by digital computer , 1968 .

[33]  J. Greist,et al.  The reliability of a computer interview for drug use/abuse information , 1983 .

[34]  Gerald H. Shure,et al.  A minicomputer system for multiperson computer-assisted telephone interviewing , 1978 .

[35]  Paul J. Lavrakas,et al.  Telephone survey methods : sampling, selection, and supervision , 1988 .

[36]  W. Nicholls CATI Research and Development at the Census Bureau , 1983 .

[37]  G. Gurin,et al.  Americans View Their Mental Health , 1979 .

[38]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations , 1976 .

[39]  W. Wood,et al.  Surveying psychology's public image. , 1986 .

[40]  J. Merrill Shanks,et al.  The Current Status of Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing , 1983 .