The structure and surface chemistry of soil particles has extensive impact on many bulk scale properties and processes of soil systems and consequently the environments that they support. There are a number of physiochemical mechanisms that operate at the nanoscale which affect the soil's capability to maintain native vegetation and crops; this includes soil hydrophobicity and the soil's capacity to hold water and nutrients. The present study used atomic force microscopy in a novel approach to provide unique insight into the nanoscale properties of natural soil particles that control the physiochemical interaction of material within the soil column. There have been few atomic force microscopy studies of soil, perhaps a reflection of the heterogeneous nature of the system. The present study adopted an imaging and force measurement research strategy that accounted for the heterogeneity and used model systems to aid interpretation. The surface roughness of natural soil particles increased with depth in the soil column a consequence of the attachment of organic material within the crevices of the soil particles. The roughness root mean square calculated from ten 25 μm2 images for five different soil particles from a Netherlands soil was 53.0 nm, 68.0 nm, 92.2 nm and 106.4 nm for the respective soil depths of 0–10 cm, 10–20 cm, 20–30 cm and 30–40 cm. A novel analysis method of atomic force microscopy phase images based on phase angle distribution across a surface was used to interpret the nanoscale distribution of organic material attached to natural and model soil particles. Phase angle distributions obtained from phase images of model surfaces were found to be bimodal, indicating multiple layers of material, which changed with the concentration of adsorbed humic acid. Phase angle distributions obtained from phase images of natural soil particles indicated a trend of decreasing surface coverage with increasing depth in the soil column. This was consistent with previous macroscopic determination of the proportions of organic material chemically extracted from bulk samples of the soils from which specimen particles were drawn. Interaction forces were measured between atomic force microscopy cantilever tips (Si3N4) and natural soil and model surfaces. Adhesion forces at humic acid free specimen surfaces (Av. 20.0 nN), which are primarily hydrophilic and whose interactions are subject to a significant contribution from the capillary forces, were found to be larger than those of specimen surfaces with adsorbed humic acid (Av. 6.5 nN). This suggests that adsorbed humic acid increased surface hydrophobicity. The magnitude and distribution of adhesion forces between atomic force microscopy tips and the natural particle surfaces was affected by both local surface roughness and the presence of adsorbed organic material. The present study has correlated nanoscale measurements with established macroscale methods of soil study. Thus, the research demonstrates that atomic force microscopy is an important addition to soil science that permits a multiscale analysis of the multifactorial phenomena of soil hydrophobicity and wetting.
[1]
C. Wright,et al.
Atomic Force Microscopy Studies of the Surface Properties of Microbial Cells
,
2007
.
[2]
Hongjun Gao,et al.
The combining analysis of height and phase images in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy: a new route for the characterization of thiol-coated gold nanoparticle film on solid substrate
,
2002
.
[3]
M. Whangbo,et al.
On the factors affecting the contrast of height and phase images in tapping mode atomic force microscopy
,
1997
.
[4]
Ali Ata,et al.
Adhesion between nanoscale rough surfaces. I. Role of asperity geometry
,
2000
.
[5]
F. Stagnitti,et al.
Extraction of compounds associated with water repellency in sandy soils of different origin
,
2005
.
[6]
E. Balnois,et al.
Characteristic features of the major components of freshwater colloidal organic matter revealed by transmission electron and atomic force microscopy
,
1999
.
[7]
A. Knoll,et al.
Tapping mode atomic force microscopy on polymers: Where is the true sample surface?
,
2001
.
[8]
S. Choi,et al.
Analysis of force distance curve for biomolecule imaging
,
2006
.
[9]
G. Dietler,et al.
Force-distance curves by atomic force microscopy
,
1999
.
[10]
C. J. Ritsema,et al.
Occurrence, prediction and hydrological effects of water repellency amongst major soil and land‐use types in a humid temperate climate
,
2006
.
[11]
Yingshun Li,et al.
Understanding tapping-mode atomic force microscopy data on the surface of soft block copolymers
,
2003
.
[12]
K. L. Mittal,et al.
Atomic force microscopy in adhesion studies
,
2005
.
[13]
P. Maurice,et al.
Atomic force microscopy of soil and stream fulvic acids
,
1997
.
[14]
Ali Ata,et al.
Adhesion between nanoscale rough surfaces. II. Measurement and comparison with theory
,
2000
.
[15]
J. Letey.
Measurement of contact angle, water drop penetration time and critical surface tension
,
1969
.
[16]
Gupta,et al.
Substrate Morphology and Particle Adhesion in Reacting Systems.
,
2000,
Journal of colloid and interface science.
[17]
T. Thundat,et al.
Characterization of atomic force microscope tips by adhesion force measurements
,
1993
.
[18]
J. Lead,et al.
Atomic Force Microscopy of Humic Substances: Effects of pH and Ionic Strength
,
1999
.
[19]
Singh,et al.
Adhesion between Nanoscale Rough Surfaces.
,
2000,
Journal of colloid and interface science.
[20]
C. Ritsema,et al.
Water repellency of soils; the influence of ambient relative humidity
,
2002
.
[21]
K. L. Nagy,et al.
Quantifying surface areas of clays by atomic force microscopy
,
2002
.
[22]
F. Elsass,et al.
Investigation of physico-chemical features of soil colloidal suspensions
,
2006
.