Strain Mapping of CdTe Grains in Photovoltaic Devices

Strain within grains and at grain boundaries (GBs) in polycrystalline thin-film absorber layers limits the overall performance because of higher defect concentrations and band fluctuations. However, the nanoscale strain distribution in operational devices is not easily accessible using standard methods. X-ray nanodiffraction offers the unique possibility to evaluate the strain or lattice spacing at nanoscale resolution. Furthermore, the combination of nanodiffraction with additional techniques in the framework of multimodal scanning X-ray microscopy enables the direct correlation of the strain with material and device parameters such as the elemental distribution or local performance. This approach is applied for the investigation of the strain distribution in CdTe grains in fully operational photovoltaic solar cells. It is found that the lattice spacing in the (111) direction remains fairly constant in the grain cores but systematically decreases at the GBs. The lower strain at GBs is accompanied by an increase of the total tilt. These observations are both compatible with the inhomogeneous incorporation of smaller atoms into the lattice, and local stress induced by neighboring grains.

[1]  Martin A. Green,et al.  Solar cell efficiency tables (version 52) , 2018, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications.

[2]  R. Harder,et al.  Coherent X-ray diffraction imaging of strain at the nanoscale. , 2009, Nature materials.

[3]  Garth J. Williams,et al.  Three-dimensional mapping of a deformation field inside a nanocrystal , 2006, Nature.

[4]  T. C. Anthony,et al.  Growth of CdTe films by close‐spaced vapor transport , 1984 .

[5]  F. Caballero-Briones,et al.  Optical and structural evidence of the grain-boundary influence on the disorder of polycrystalline CdTe films , 1999 .

[6]  B. Lai,et al.  X-Ray Beam Induced Voltage: A Novel Technique for Electrical Nanocharacterization of Solar Cells , 2017 .

[7]  B. Lai,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities with Highly Brilliant X-ray Sources for multi-Modal in-Situ and Operando Characterization of Solar Cells , 2018, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[8]  M. Young,et al.  CdCl2 treatment, S diffusion, and recombination in polycrystalline CdTe , 2006 .

[9]  Hanfei Yan,et al.  Measuring Three-Dimensional Strain and Structural Defects in a Single InGaAs Nanowire Using Coherent X-ray Multiangle Bragg Projection Ptychography. , 2018, Nano letters.

[10]  J. Major Grain boundaries in CdTe thin film solar cells: a review , 2016 .

[11]  B. Lai,et al.  Engineering solar cells based on correlative X-ray microscopy , 2017 .

[12]  B. Lai,et al.  Nanoscale Growth Kinetics of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Absorbers , 2018, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.

[13]  Y S Chu,et al.  Design and performance of an X-ray scanning microscope at the Hard X-ray Nanoprobe beamline of NSLS-II. , 2017, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[14]  G. Feuillet,et al.  Local band bending and grain-to-grain interaction induced strain nonuniformity in polycrystalline CdTe films , 2014 .

[15]  B. Lai,et al.  How Does CIGS Performance Depend on Temperature at the Microscale? , 2018, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[16]  C. Ossig,et al.  X-ray Beam Induced Current Measurements for Multi-Modal X-ray Microscopy of Solar Cells. , 2019, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[17]  Xuanzhi Wu,et al.  High-efficiency polycrystalline CdTe thin-film solar cells , 2004 .

[18]  R. Birkmire,et al.  Interdiffusion of CdS/CdTe thin films: Modeling x-ray diffraction line profiles , 2001 .

[19]  Moon J. Kim,et al.  Atomic and electronic structure of Lomer dislocations at CdTe bicrystal interface , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Stéphane Collin,et al.  Luminescence methodology to determine grain-boundary, grain-interior, and surface recombination in thin-film solar cells , 2018, Journal of Applied Physics.

[21]  Walajabad S. Sampath,et al.  Optimization of CdTe thin‐film solar cell efficiency using a sputtered, oxygenated CdS window layer , 2015 .

[22]  K. Jones,et al.  Influence of substrate structure on the growth of CdTe thin films , 2001 .

[23]  K. Jones,et al.  Intermixing at the CdS/CdTe Interface and its Effect on Device Performance , 1996 .

[24]  Mowafak Al-Jassim,et al.  Direct evidence of enhanced chlorine segregation at grain boundaries in polycrystalline CdTe thin films via three‐dimensional TOF‐SIMS imaging , 2015 .

[25]  E. Nazaretski,et al.  Multimodal X-ray imaging of grain-level properties and performance in a polycrystalline solar cell , 2019, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[26]  H. Guthrey,et al.  Recombination by grain-boundary type in CdTe , 2015 .

[27]  G. Feuillet,et al.  The flow stress in polycrystalline films : Dimensional constraints and strengthening effects , 2008 .

[28]  H. Guthrey,et al.  Cathodoluminescence Analysis of Grain Boundaries and Grain Interiors in Thin-Film CdTe , 2014, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[29]  Nathalie Bouet,et al.  Multimodal hard x-ray imaging with resolution approaching 10 nm for studies in material science , 2018 .

[30]  J. Holt,et al.  High-resolution three-dimensional structural microscopy by single-angle Bragg ptychography. , 2015, Nature materials.

[31]  I. Robinson,et al.  Partial Coherence Effects on the Imaging of Small Crystals using Coherent X-ray Diffraction , 2001 .

[32]  P. Schuck,et al.  3D Lifetime Tomography Reveals How CdCl2 Improves Recombination Throughout CdTe Solar Cells , 2017, Advanced materials.

[33]  M. Al‐Jassim,et al.  Quantitative Determination of Grain-Boundary Recombination Velocity in CdTe by Cathodoluminescence Measurements and Numerical Simulations , 2015, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[34]  J. Pankow,et al.  Properties of reactively sputtered oxygenated cadmium sulfide (CdS:O) and their impact on CdTe solar cell performance , 2015 .