Method for validating cloud mask obtained from satellite measurements using ground-based sky camera.

Error propagation in Earth's atmospheric, oceanic, and land surface parameters of the satellite products caused by misclassification of the cloud mask is a critical issue for improving the accuracy of satellite products. Thus, characterizing the accuracy of the cloud mask is important for investigating the influence of the cloud mask on satellite products. In this study, we proposed a method for validating multiwavelength satellite data derived cloud masks using ground-based sky camera (GSC) data. First, a cloud cover algorithm for GSC data has been developed using sky index and bright index. Then, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite data derived cloud masks by two cloud-screening algorithms (i.e., MOD35 and CLAUDIA) were validated using the GSC cloud mask. The results indicate that MOD35 is likely to classify ambiguous pixels as "cloudy," whereas CLAUDIA is likely to classify them as "clear." Furthermore, the influence of error propagations caused by misclassification of the MOD35 and CLAUDIA cloud masks on MODIS derived reflectance, brightness temperature, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in clear and cloudy pixels was investigated using sky camera data. It shows that the influence of the error propagation by the MOD35 cloud mask on the MODIS derived monthly mean reflectance, brightness temperature, and NDVI for clear pixels is significantly smaller than for the CLAUDIA cloud mask; the influence of the error propagation by the CLAUDIA cloud mask on MODIS derived monthly mean cloud products for cloudy pixels is significantly smaller than that by the MOD35 cloud mask.

[1]  Steven A. Ackerman,et al.  Comparison of Satellite and All-Sky Camera Estimates of Cloud Cover during GATE , 1981 .

[2]  T. Nakajima,et al.  Wide-Area Determination of Cloud Microphysical Properties from NOAA AVHRR Measurements for FIRE and ASTEX Regions , 1995 .

[3]  A. Heinle,et al.  Automatic cloud classification of whole sky images , 2010 .

[4]  Steven Platnick,et al.  An assessment of differences between cloud effective particle radius retrievals for marine water clouds from three MODIS spectral bands , 2011 .

[5]  Steven A. Ackerman,et al.  Global Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud detection and height evaluation using CALIOP , 2008 .

[6]  Hironobu Iwabuchi,et al.  A multi-spectral non-local method for retrieval of boundary layer cloud properties from optical remote sensing data , 2003 .

[7]  Kentaroh Suzuki,et al.  On the cloud observations in JAXA's next coming satellite missions , 2012, Asia-Pacific Environmental Remote Sensing.

[8]  Steven A. Ackerman,et al.  Cloud Detection with MODIS. Part II: Validation , 2008 .

[9]  A Cazorla,et al.  Development of a sky imager for cloud cover assessment. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  Haruma Ishida,et al.  Development of an unbiased cloud detection algorithm for a spaceborne multispectral imager , 2009 .

[11]  Husi Letu,et al.  Development of an ice crystal scattering database for the global change observation mission/second generation global imager satellite mission: investigating the refractive index grid system and potential retrieval error. , 2012, Applied optics.

[12]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Investigation of GOSAT TANSO-CAI Cloud Screening Ability through an Intersatellite Comparison , 2011 .

[13]  T. Nakajima,et al.  Cloud Microphysical Properties as Seen from Spaceborne Passive Multi-Spectral Imagers: Interpretation in Terms of Vertical and Horizontal Inhomogeneity by Using Modeling and Other Spaceborne Instruments , 2014 .

[14]  J. Kleissl,et al.  Intra-hour forecasting with a total sky imager at the UC San Diego solar energy testbed , 2011 .

[15]  Takashi Nakajima,et al.  Interpretation of Multiwavelength-Retrieved Droplet Effective Radii for Warm Water Clouds in Terms of In-Cloud Vertical Inhomogeneity by Using a Spectral Bin Microphysics Cloud Model , 2013 .

[16]  Q.‐H. Zhang,et al.  On the importance of interplanetary magnetic field B on polar cap patch formation , 2011 .

[17]  Haruhisa Shimoda,et al.  Cloud detection performance of spaceborne visible-to-infrared multispectral imagers. , 2011, Applied optics.

[18]  Larry L. Stowe,et al.  Scientific basis and initial evaluation of the CLAVR-1 global clear cloud classification algorithm f , 1999 .

[19]  M. Yamashita,et al.  Development of Sky Conditions Observation Method using Whole Sky Camera , 2008 .

[20]  Teruyuki Nakajima,et al.  A Global Determination of Cloud Microphysics with AVHRR Remote Sensing , 2001 .

[21]  Beichen Zhang,et al.  On the importance of interplanetary magnetic field ∣By∣ on polar cap patch formation , 2011 .

[22]  C. W. Chow,et al.  A method for cloud detection and opacity classification based on ground based sky imagery , 2012 .

[23]  W. Menzel,et al.  Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS , 1998 .

[24]  Haruhisa Shimoda,et al.  Cloud sciences using satellite remote sensing, cloud growth model, and radiative transfer , 2010, Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing.

[25]  Richard A. Frey,et al.  Cloud Detection with MODIS. Part I: Improvements in the MODIS Cloud Mask for Collection 5 , 2008 .

[26]  Jian Xu,et al.  A sensitivity study for far infrared balloon-borne limb emission sounding of stratospheric trace gases , 2013 .