Regulation of Signal Duration and the Statistical Dynamics of Kinase Activation by Scaffold Proteins

Scaffolding proteins that direct the assembly of multiple kinases into a spatially localized signaling complex are often essential for the maintenance of an appropriate biological response. Although scaffolds are widely believed to have dramatic effects on the dynamics of signal propagation, the mechanisms that underlie these consequences are not well understood. Here, Monte Carlo simulations of a model kinase cascade are used to investigate how the temporal characteristics of signaling cascades can be influenced by the presence of scaffold proteins. Specifically, we examine the effects of spatially localizing kinase components on a scaffold on signaling dynamics. The simulations indicate that a major effect that scaffolds exert on the dynamics of cell signaling is to control how the activation of protein kinases is distributed over time. Scaffolds can influence the timing of kinase activation by allowing for kinases to become activated over a broad range of times, thus allowing for signaling at both early and late times. Scaffold concentrations that result in optimal signal amplitude also result in the broadest distributions of times over which kinases are activated. These calculations provide insights into one mechanism that describes how the duration of a signal can potentially be regulated in a scaffold mediated protein kinase cascade. Our results illustrate another complexity in the broad array of control properties that emerge from the physical effects of spatially localizing components of kinase cascades on scaffold proteins.

[1]  G. Papoian,et al.  Stochastic resonant signaling in enzyme cascades. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[2]  J. Ferrelljr,et al.  Tripping the switch fantastic: how a protein kinase cascade can convert graded inputs into switch-like outputs , 1996 .

[3]  J. Blenis,et al.  MAPK signal specificity: the right place at the right time. , 2006, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[4]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Dynamic control of signaling by modular adaptor proteins. , 2007, Current opinion in cell biology.

[5]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  Mathematical models of protein kinase signal transduction. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[6]  Linda G. Cima Receptors: Models for binding, trafficking and signaling. By Douglas A. Lauffenburger and Jennifer J. Linderman, Oxford University Press, 1993, $70.00 , 1994 .

[7]  Caleb J Bashor,et al.  The Ste5 Scaffold Allosterically Modulates Signaling Output of the Yeast Mating Pathway , 2006, Science.

[8]  Christopher C. Goodnow,et al.  Differential activation of transcription factors induced by Ca2+ response amplitude and duration , 1997, Nature.

[9]  M. Vacher,et al.  Translational diffusion of globular proteins in the cytoplasm of cultured muscle cells. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Matthias Peter,et al.  Scaffold proteins in MAP kinase signaling: more than simple passive activating platforms , 2006, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[11]  C. Marshall,et al.  Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: Transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation , 1995, Cell.

[12]  T. Pawson,et al.  Signaling through scaffold, anchoring, and adaptor proteins. , 1997, Science.

[13]  Robert E. Lewis,et al.  The Molecular Scaffold KSR1 Regulates the Proliferative and Oncogenic Potential of Cells , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[14]  L. Langeberg,et al.  The protein kinase A anchoring protein mAKAP coordinates two integrated cAMP effector pathways , 2005, Nature.

[15]  P. Bastiaens,et al.  Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[16]  R. Davis,et al.  The role of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) in apoptosis induced by ultraviolet C and gamma radiation. Duration of JNK activation may determine cell death and proliferation. , 1996, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  Jehoshua Bruck,et al.  Scaffold proteins may biphasically affect the levels of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and reduce its threshold properties. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Eric Verdin,et al.  Duration of Nuclear NF-κB Action Regulated by Reversible Acetylation , 2001, Science.

[19]  D. Morrison,et al.  Regulation of MAP kinase signaling modules by scaffold proteins in mammals. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[20]  B. Kholodenko Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[21]  W. R. Burack,et al.  Signal transduction: hanging on a scaffold. , 2000, Current opinion in cell biology.

[22]  Hiroshi Sakaue,et al.  The Molecular Scaffold Kinase Suppressor of Ras 1 (KSR1) Regulates Adipogenesis , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[23]  S. Véronneau,et al.  Signal-Regulated Kinase Activation Mobilization and Extracellular Platelet-Activating Factor-Mediated Calcium Caveolae Facilitate but Are Not Essential for , 2009 .

[24]  X. Xie,et al.  Probing Gene Expression in Live Cells, One Protein Molecule at a Time , 2006, Science.

[25]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Rewiring MAP Kinase Pathways Using Alternative Scaffold Assembly Mechanisms , 2003, Science.

[26]  Charles S. Zuker,et al.  Assembly of the Drosophila phototransduction cascade into a signalling complex shapes elementary responses , 1998, Nature.

[27]  S. Redner A guide to first-passage processes , 2001 .

[28]  Jason W Locasale,et al.  Allovalency revisited: an analysis of multisite phosphorylation and substrate rebinding. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[29]  A. Chakraborty,et al.  Scaffold proteins confer diverse regulatory properties to protein kinase cascades , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  C. Bashor,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Using Engineered Scaffold Interactions to Reshape Map Kinase Pathway Signaling Dynamics , 2022 .

[31]  Rey-Huei Chen,et al.  Molecular interpretation of ERK signal duration by immediate early gene products , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[32]  Sidney Redner,et al.  A guide to first-passage processes , 2001 .

[33]  Barbara Hausmann,et al.  Thymic selection threshold defined by compartmentalization of Ras/MAPK signalling , 2006, Nature.

[34]  J. Hasty,et al.  Statistics of cellular signal transduction as a race to the nucleus by multiple random walkers in compartment/phosphorylation space , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Berend Smit,et al.  Understanding molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications , 1996 .

[36]  W. R. Burack,et al.  The activating dual phosphorylation of MAPK by MEK is nonprocessive. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[37]  Shinya Kuroda,et al.  Prediction and validation of the distinct dynamics of transient and sustained ERK activation , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[38]  Angus C. Nairn,et al.  NMDA-mediated activation of the tyrosine phosphatase STEP regulates the duration of ERK signaling , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  P. R. ten Wolde,et al.  Exact results for noise power spectra in linear biochemical reaction networks. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[40]  X. Xie,et al.  Single-molecule enzymatic dynamics. , 1998, Science.

[41]  Kenneth M. Murphy,et al.  Kinase Suppressor of Ras (KSR) Is a Scaffold Which Facilitates Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activation In Vivo , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[42]  L. Langeberg,et al.  The where's and when's of kinase anchoring. , 2006, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[43]  Boris N Kholodenko,et al.  Scaffolding Protein Grb2-associated Binder 1 Sustains Epidermal Growth Factor-induced Mitogenic and Survival Signaling by Multiple Positive Feedback Loops* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  Holger Sondermann,et al.  Regulation of Ras Signaling Dynamics by Sos-Mediated Positive Feedback , 2006, Current Biology.

[45]  Berend Smit,et al.  Understanding Molecular Simulation , 2001 .

[46]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Negative feedback and ultrasensitivity can bring about oscillations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. , 2000, European journal of biochemistry.

[47]  D. Chandler,et al.  Introduction To Modern Statistical Mechanics , 1987 .

[48]  Walter Kolch,et al.  Identification of the Mechanisms Regulating the Differential Activation of the MAPK Cascade by Epidermal Growth Factor and Nerve Growth Factor in PC12 Cells* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[49]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[50]  Jeroen S. van Zon,et al.  Diffusion of transcription factors can drastically enhance the noise in gene expression. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[51]  W. Kolch Coordinating ERK/MAPK signalling through scaffolds and inhibitors , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[52]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Receptors: Models for Binding, Trafficking, and Signaling , 1993 .

[53]  P. R. ten Wolde,et al.  Signal detection, modularity, and the correlation between extrinsic and intrinsic noise in biochemical networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[54]  M. Karin,et al.  Mammalian MAP kinase signalling cascades , 2001, Nature.

[55]  Brian D. Slaughter,et al.  Mapping dynamic protein interactions in MAP kinase signaling using live-cell fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy and imaging , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  E. Gilles,et al.  Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.