Anatomy and time course of discrimination and categorization processes in vision: an fMRI study

Studies investigating the cerebral areas involved in visual processes generally oppose either different tasks or different stimulus types. This work addresses, by fMRI, the interaction between the type of task (discrimination vs. categorization) and the type of stimulus (Latin letters, well-known geometrical figures, and Korean letters). Behavioral data revealed that the two tasks did not differ in term of percentage of errors or correct responses, but a delay of 185 ms was observed for the categorization task in comparison with the discrimination task. All conditions activated a common neural network that includes both striate and extrastriate areas, especially the fusiform gyri, the precunei, the insulae, and the dorsolateral frontal cortex. In addition, interaction analysis revealed that the right insula was sensitive to both tasks and stimuli, and that stimulus type induced several significant signal variations for the categorization task in right frontal cortex, the right middle occipital gyrus, the right cuneus, and the left and right fusiform gyri, whereas for the discrimination task, significant signal variations were observed in the right occipito-parietal junction only. Finally, analyzing the latency of the BOLD signal also revealed a differential neural dynamics according to tasks but not to stimulus type. These temporal differences suggest a parallel hemisphere processing in the discrimination task vs. a cooperative interhemisphere processing in the categorization task that may reflect the observed differences in reaction time.

[1]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[2]  Ferath Kherif,et al.  Temporal sorting of neural components underlying phonological processing. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[3]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) of the human brain , 1994, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  M. Tarr,et al.  Levels of categorization in visual recognition studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Current Biology.

[5]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Understanding neural system dynamics through task modulation and measurement of functional MRI amplitude, latency, and width , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[7]  S Lehéricy,et al.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  M. Banich The Missing Link: The Role of Interhemispheric Interaction in Attentional Processing , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Preface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age , 1991 .

[10]  S. Petersen,et al.  Hemispheric Specialization in Human Dorsal Frontal Cortex and Medial Temporal Lobe for Verbal and Nonverbal Memory Encoding , 1998, Neuron.

[11]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  How Distributed Is Visual Category Information in Human Occipito-Temporal Cortex? An fMRI Study , 2002, Neuron.

[12]  R. Goebel,et al.  Tracking cognitive processes with functional MRI mental chronometry , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  M. Petrides,et al.  Differential activation of the human orbital, mid-ventrolateral, and mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during the processing of visual stimuli , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  E. Warrington,et al.  Visual Object Recognition in Patients with Right-Hemisphere Lesions: Axes or Features? , 1986, Perception.

[15]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Authors’ Correction to “Routes to Object Constancy” , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[16]  Patrice Y. Simard,et al.  Time is of the essence: a conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  G. Humphreys,et al.  A case of integrative visual agnosia. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  S. Thorpe,et al.  The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Set-and Code-Specific Activation in the Frontal Cortex: An fMRI Study of Encoding and Retrieval of Faces and Words , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition , 2001 .

[21]  Gabriele Lohmann,et al.  Within-subject variability of BOLD response dynamics , 2003, NeuroImage.

[22]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  N. Logothetis,et al.  IS FACE RECOGNITION NOT SO UNIQUE AFTER ALL? , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[24]  M. Tagamets,et al.  A Parametric Approach to Orthographic Processing in the Brain: An fMRI Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[26]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  A Locus in Human Extrastriate Cortex for Visual Shape Analysis , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging of Visual Recognition , 2001 .

[29]  J. Bullier Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[30]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[31]  H. D. Gage,et al.  Cortical Activity Related to Accuracy of Letter Recognition , 2000, NeuroImage.

[32]  R. Buckner,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:373–377(1998) � Event-Related fMRI and the Hemodynamic Response , 2022 .

[33]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Identifying objects at different levels of hierarchy: A positron emission tomography study , 1995 .

[34]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Cognitive Neuropsychology: Patterns of Co-occurrence Among the Associative Agnosias: Implications for Visual Object Representation , 1991 .

[35]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging: Network Analyses , 2001 .

[36]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cognitive Conjunction: A New Approach to Brain Activation Experiments , 1997, NeuroImage.

[37]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Routes to Object Constancy: Implications from Neurological Impairments of Object Constancy , 1984, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[39]  N Mai,et al.  Disturbance of movement vision after bilateral posterior brain damage. Further evidence and follow up observations. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[40]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[41]  A. Damasio,et al.  Central achromatopsia , 1980, Neurology.

[42]  M. Tarr,et al.  DOES VISUAL SUBORDINATE-LEVEL CATEGORISATION ENGAGE THE FUNCTIONALLY DEFINED FUSIFORM FACE AREA? , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[43]  J. Jonides,et al.  Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. , 1999, Science.

[44]  J. Wagemans,et al.  The Representation of Shape in the Context of Visual Object Categorization Tasks , 2000, NeuroImage.

[45]  J. Joseph,et al.  Shared and dissociated cortical regions for object and letter processing. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[46]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[47]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  Discrimination of Large Venous Vessels in Time‐Course Spiral Blood‐Oxygen‐Level‐Dependent Magnetic‐Resonance Functional Neuroimaging , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[48]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[49]  Hélène Gros,et al.  Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Extrastriate Cortex Response to a Categorically Ambiguous Stimulus Primed by Letters and Familiar Geometric Figures , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[50]  D. Schacter,et al.  Perceptual specificity in visual object priming: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a laterality difference in fusiform cortex , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  A. Mechelli,et al.  Neuroimaging Studies of Word and Pseudoword Reading: Consistencies, Inconsistencies, and Limitations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Human Brain Regions Involved in Visual Categorization , 2002, NeuroImage.

[53]  Jacqueline Liederman,et al.  The Dynamics of Interhemispheric Collaboration and Hemispheric Control , 1998, Brain and Cognition.