EUROCODE 8 PROVISIONS FOR STEEL AND STEEL-CONCRETE COMPOSITE STRUCTURES: COMMENTS, CRITIQUES, IMPROVEMENT PROPOSALS AND RESEARCH NEEDS

This paper presents a summary of those aspects which are deemed to represent key issues for the correct maintenance of the current Eurocode 8 provisions for the design of steel and composite steel/concrete structures. The general design rules are first commented and, subsequently, aspects specific of each structural type are discussed. Based on the knowledge acquired in the last few years, weaknesses of the current code are then highlighted and improvement proposals presented. Topics requiring further research are eventually identified aiming at paving the way for the next generation of the European seismic code.

[1]  Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl,et al.  Seismic Behavior and Design of Gusset Plates , 1998 .

[2]  Raffaele Landolfo,et al.  Preliminary results of an experimental program on the cyclic response and rotation capacity of steel members , 2009 .

[3]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Theory and Design of Seismic Resistant Steel Frames , 1996 .

[4]  C. Amadio Probabilistic analysis of a partially-restrained steel-concrete composite frame , 2008 .

[5]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings , 2001 .

[6]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Seismic design and performance of composite frames , 2004 .

[7]  Constantin Christopoulos,et al.  Gusset Plate Connections to Circular Hollow Section Braces under Inelastic Cyclic Loading , 2008 .

[8]  A. Y. Elghazouli,et al.  China SEISMIC DESIGN OF STEEL-FRAMED STRUCTURES TO EUROCODE 8 , 2008 .

[9]  Dan Dubina,et al.  Dual high‐strength steel eccentrically braced frames with removable links , 2008 .

[10]  Luís Simões da Silva,et al.  Design of Steel Structures: Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings , 2010 .

[11]  Francesca Ceroni,et al.  Experimental Results of Steel-Concrete Composite Beams under Hogging Moment , 2010 .

[12]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Plastic shear overstrength of short links with axial restraints , 2009 .

[13]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  “ ONLY-STEEL ” BUCKLING-RESTRAINED BRACES AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY , 2008 .

[14]  S C Goel,et al.  EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT DESIGN OF DOUBLE-ANGLE BRACINGS , 1986 .

[15]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Design and behavior of zipper-braced frames , 2008 .

[16]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Inelastic seismic response of steel bracing members , 2002 .

[17]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Seismic analysis of MR steel frames based on refined hysteretic models of connections , 2002 .

[18]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Experimental analysis of steel dissipative bracing systems for seismic upgrading , 2009 .

[19]  Luigi Fiorino,et al.  Cold formed steel beams under monotonic and cyclic loading: Experimental investigation , 2009 .

[20]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[21]  Gaetano Della Corte,et al.  Development of a Displacement-Based Design Method for Steel Frame-RC Wall Buildings , 2010 .

[22]  M. R. Di Sarno L. Fabbrocino G. Pecce Inelastic response of composite base column connections , 2006 .

[23]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENTS AND NUMERICAL VERIFICATION OF A DISPLACEMENT-BASED DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR STEEL BRACED STRUCTURES , 2008 .

[24]  G. De Matteis,et al.  Pure aluminium shear panels as dissipative devices in moment‐resisting steel frames , 2007 .