Customized noise-stimulation intensity for bipedal stability and unipedal balance deficits associated with functional ankle instability.

CONTEXT Stochastic resonance stimulation (SRS) administered at an optimal intensity could maximize the effects of treatment on balance. OBJECTIVE To determine if a customized optimal SRS intensity is better than a traditional SRS protocol (applying the same percentage sensory threshold intensity for all participants) for improving double- and single-legged balance in participants with or without functional ankle instability (FAI). DESIGN Case-control study with an embedded crossover design. SETTING Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS Twelve healthy participants (6 men, 6 women; age = 22 ± 2 years, height = 170 ± 7 cm, mass = 64 ± 10 kg) and 12 participants (6 men, 6 women; age = 23 ± 3 years, height = 174 ± 8 cm, mass = 69 ± 10 kg) with FAI. INTERVENTION(S) The SRS optimal intensity level was determined by finding the intensity from 4 experimental intensities at the percentage sensory threshold (25% [SRS₂₅], 50% [SRS₅₀], 75% [SRS₇₅], 90% [SRS₉₀]) that produced the greatest improvement in resultant center-of-pressure velocity (R-COPV) over a control condition (SRS₀) during double-legged balance. We examined double- and single-legged balance tests, comparing optimal SRS (SRS(opt1)) and SRS₀ using a battery of center-of-pressure measures in the frontal and sagittal planes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Anterior-posterior (A-P) and medial-lateral (M-L) center-of-pressure velocity (COPV) and center-of-pressure excursion (COPE), R-COPV, and 95th percentile center-of-pressure area ellipse (COPA-95). RESULTS Data were organized into bins that represented optimal (SRS(opt1)), second (SRS(opt2)), third (SRS(opt3)), and fourth (SRS(opt4)) improvement over SRS₀. The SRS(opt1) enhanced R-COPV (P ≤ .05) over SRS₀ and other SRS conditions (SRS₀ = 0.94 ± 0.32 cm/s, SRS(opt1) = 0.80 ± 0.19 cm/s, SRS(opt2) = 0.88 ± 0.24 cm/s, SRS(opt3) = 0.94 ± 0.25 cm/s, SRS(opt4) = 1.00 ± 0.28 cm/s). However, SRS did not improve R-COPV over SRS₀ when data were categorized by sensory threshold. Furthermore, SRS(opt1) improved double-legged balance over SRS₀ from 11% to 25% in all participants for the center-of-pressure frontal- and sagittal-plane assessments (P ≤ .05). The SRS(opt1) also improved single-legged balance over SRS₀ from 10% to 17% in participants with FAI for the center-of-pressure frontal- and sagittal-plane assessments (P ≤ .05). The SRS(opt1) did not improve single-legged balance in participants with stable ankles. CONCLUSIONS The SRS(opt1) improved double-legged balance and transfers to enhancing single-legged balance deficits associated with FAI.