Refined empirical line method to calibrate IKONOS imagery

To extract quantitative biophysical parameters such as leaf biomass and leaf chlorophyll concentration from the remotely sensed imagery, the effect of atmospheric attenuation must be removed. The refined empirical line (REL) method was used to calibrate the IKONOS multispectral imagery. The IKONOS digital numbers (DN) were converted to the at-satellite reflectance, then the linear relation between at-satellite reflectance and surface spectral reflectance (ρλ) was derived from six bright targets of known reflectance in the image, and modelled estimates of the image reflectance at ρλ=0. Validation targets were used to test the feasibility of REL method. The mean relative errors between ρλ retrieved from IKONOS image using REL method and ground-measured ρλ were 11%, 13%, 3% and 5% in the IKONOS blue, green, red and near-infrared (NIR) respectively. When dark targets are unavailable or measurement of dark target is inconvenient, the REL method was most crucial for retrieving surface spectral reflectance. The REL offers a simple approach for quantitative retrieval of biophysical parameters from IKONOS imagery.

[1]  E. Milton,et al.  The use of the empirical line method to calibrate remotely sensed data to reflectance , 1999 .

[2]  Kurtis J. Thome,et al.  A refined empirical line approach for reflectance factor retrieval from Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+ , 2001 .

[3]  F. Kruse Use of airborne imaging spectrometer data to map minerals associated with hydrothermally altered rocks in the northern grapevine mountains, Nevada, and California , 1988 .

[4]  T. Malthus,et al.  The empirical line method for the atmospheric correction of IKONOS imagery , 2003 .

[5]  N. S. Trahair,et al.  Evaluation of apparent surface reflectance estimation methodologies , 1995 .

[6]  R. Richter,et al.  Geo-atmospheric processing of airborne imaging spectrometry data. Part 2: Atmospheric/topographic correction , 2002 .

[7]  M. Schaepman,et al.  Retrieving sup-pixel land cover composition through an effective integration of the spatial, spectral, and temporal dimensions of MERIS imagery , 2005 .

[8]  E. M. Perry,et al.  Comparison of atmospheric modelling versus empirical line fitting for mosaicking HYDICE imagery , 2000 .

[9]  D. C. Robertson,et al.  MODTRAN cloud and multiple scattering upgrades with application to AVIRIS , 1998 .

[10]  Erzsébet Merényi,et al.  Retrieval of apparent surface reflectance from AVIRIS data: A comparison of empirical line, radiative transfer, and spectral mixture methods , 1994 .

[11]  P. Deschamps,et al.  Description of a computer code to simulate the satellite signal in the solar spectrum : the 5S code , 1990 .

[12]  Eyal Ben-Dor,et al.  Determination of surface reflectance from raw hyperspectral data without simultaneous ground data measurements: A case study of the GER 63-channel sensor data acquired over Naan, Israel , 2000 .

[13]  Gail P. Anderson,et al.  Atmospheric correction of spectral imagery: evaluation of the FLAASH algorithm with AVIRIS data , 2002, Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop, 2002. Proceedings..