Do Sustainable Stocks Offer Diversification Benefits for Conventional Portfolios? An Empirical Analysis of Risk Spillovers and Dynamic Correlations

This paper explores the potential diversification benefits of socially responsible investments for conventional stock portfolios by examining the risk spillovers and dynamic correlations between conventional and sustainability stock indexes from a number of regions. We observe significant unidirectional volatility transmissions from conventional to sustainable equities, suggesting that the criteria applied for socially responsible investments do not necessarily shield these securities from common market shocks. While significant dynamic correlations are observed between sustainable and conventional stocks, particularly in Europe, the analysis of both in- and out-of-sample dynamic portfolios suggests that supplementing conventional stock portfolios with sustainable counterparts improves the risk/return profile of stock portfolios in all regions. The findings overall suggest that sustainable investments can indeed provide diversification gains for conventional stock portfolios globally.

[1]  G. Hunanyan,et al.  Portfolio Selection , 2019, Finanzwirtschaft, Banken und Bankmanagement I Finance, Banks and Bank Management.

[2]  N. Antonakakis,et al.  Predictability of sustainable investments and the role of uncertainty: evidence from a non-parametric causality-in-quantiles test , 2016 .

[3]  Duc Khuong Nguyen,et al.  Risk Spillovers across the Energy and Carbon Markets and Hedging Strategies for Carbon Risk , 2016 .

[4]  E. Junarsin,et al.  Socially Responsible Mutual Funds , 2015 .

[5]  Rangan Gupta,et al.  Identifying Asymmetries between Socially Responsible and Conventional Investments , 2015 .

[6]  Duc Khuong Nguyen,et al.  Policy uncertainty and performance characteristics of sustainable investments across regions around the global financial crisis , 2014 .

[7]  F. Jawadi,et al.  Conventional and Islamic stock price performance: An empirical investigation , 2014 .

[8]  Michael McAleer,et al.  Ten Things You Should Know About the Dynamic Conditional Correlation Representation , 2013 .

[9]  K. Koedijk,et al.  Stakeholder relations and stock returns: On errors in investors' expectations and learning , 2013 .

[10]  N. Guenster Performance Implications of SR Investing: Past versus Future , 2012 .

[11]  John R. Nofsinger,et al.  Socially Responsible Funds and Market Crises , 2012 .

[12]  Chendi Zhang,et al.  Is ethical money financially smart? Nonfinancial attributes and money flows of socially responsible investment funds , 2011 .

[13]  M. Venkatachalam,et al.  Are Sin Stocks Paying the Price for Accounting Sins? , 2011 .

[14]  B. Lucey,et al.  Hedges and Safe Havens: An Examination of Stocks, Bonds, Gold, Oil and Exchange Rates , 2013 .

[15]  Gurudeo Anand Tularam,et al.  Are socially responsible investment markets worldwide integrated , 2010 .

[16]  Hsiang-Tai Lee Regime switching correlation hedging , 2010 .

[17]  D. Kidd,et al.  The Price of Sin: The Effects of Social Norms on Markets , 2010 .

[18]  Alex Edmans,et al.  Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles? Employee Satisfaction and Equity Prices , 2010 .

[19]  Michael McAleer,et al.  Crude Oil Hedging Strategies Using Dynamic Multivariate GARCH , 2010 .

[20]  T. Nakatani An alternative test for causality in variance in the conditional correlation GARCH models , 2010 .

[21]  Charles M. C. Lee,et al.  Corruption and International Valuation: Does Virtue Pay? , 2009, The Journal of Investing.

[22]  M. A. Thompson,et al.  Precious Metals-Exchange Rate Volatility Transmissions and Hedging Strategies , 2009 .

[23]  StatmanMeir,et al.  The Wages of Social Responsibility , 2009 .

[24]  M. Statman,et al.  The Wages of Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[25]  Bert Scholtens,et al.  The stocks at stake: Return and risk in socially responsible investment. , 2008 .

[26]  Mark Kritzman,et al.  The Cost of Socially Responsible Investing , 2008, The Journal Of Portfolio Management.

[27]  Jacquelyn E. Humphrey,et al.  Socially Responsible Investment Funds: Investor Reaction to Current and Past Returns , 2008 .

[28]  L. Renneboog,et al.  Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior , 2008 .

[29]  Chendi Zhang,et al.  The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds , 2008 .

[30]  Alexander Kempf,et al.  The Effect of Socially Responsible Investing on Portfolio Performance , 2007 .

[31]  Nicolas P. B. Bollen,et al.  Mutual Fund Attributes and Investor Behavior , 2007, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[32]  F. T. Magiera Socially Responsible Investments: Goody-Two-Shoes or Bad to the Bone? , 2007 .

[33]  Rob Bauer,et al.  The Ethical Mutual Fund Performance Debate: New Evidence from Canada , 2007 .

[34]  Rob Bauer,et al.  The Economic Value of Corporate Eco‐Efficiency , 2006 .

[35]  C. Hafner,et al.  A Lagrange multiplier test for causality in variance , 2006 .

[36]  Michael Schröder,et al.  Is There a Difference? The Performance Characteristics of SRI Equity Indices , 2007 .

[37]  Monica Billio,et al.  Multivariate Markov switching dynamic conditional correlation GARCH representations for contagion analysis , 2005, Stat. Methods Appl..

[38]  C. D. Sinclair,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of Ethical and Non-Ethical Funds: A Matched Pair Analysis , 2005 .

[39]  Daryl K. Manullang,et al.  “Doing well while doing good” revisited: A study of socially responsible firms’ short-term versus long-term performance. , 2005 .

[40]  Rob Bauer,et al.  The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle , 2004 .

[41]  M. Statman What Do Investors Want? , 2004 .

[42]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[43]  Michael McAleer,et al.  ASYMPTOTIC THEORY FOR A VECTOR ARMA-GARCH MODEL , 2003, Econometric Theory.

[44]  R. Engle Dynamic Conditional Correlation , 2002 .

[45]  Rob Bauer,et al.  International Evidence on Ethical Mutual Fund Performance and Investment Style , 2002 .

[46]  L. Charles,et al.  Corruption and International Valuation: Does Virtue Pay? , 2002 .

[47]  Rob Gray,et al.  The financial performance of European ethical funds 1996-1998 , 2002 .

[48]  M. Statman,et al.  Socially Responsible Mutual Funds (corrected) , 2000 .

[49]  R. Engle Dynamic Conditional Correlation : A Simple Class of Multivariate GARCH Models , 2000 .

[50]  J. David Diltz,et al.  The performance of socially responsible mutual funds: incorporating sociopolitical information in portfolio selection , 1999 .

[51]  K. Kroner,et al.  Modeling Asymmetric Comovements of Asset Returns , 1998 .

[52]  John B. Guerard,et al.  Is There a Cost to Being Socially Responsible in Investing , 1997 .

[53]  Pietra Rivoli,et al.  Does Ethical Investing Impose a Cost Upon the Firm? A Theoretical Perspective , 1997 .

[54]  John Matatko,et al.  Ethical Unit Trust Financial Performance: Small Company Effects and Fund Size Effects , 1997 .

[55]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[56]  D. A. Sauer The impact of social-responsibility screens on investment performance: Evidence from the Domini 400 social index and Domini Equity Mutual Fund , 1997 .

[57]  Stephen Gray Modeling the Conditional Distribution of Interest Rates as a Regime-Switching Process , 1996 .

[58]  Brahim Saadouni,et al.  The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Funds , 1995 .

[59]  James D. Hamilton,et al.  Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity and changes in regime , 1994 .

[60]  Jun Cai A Markov Model of Switching-Regime ARCH , 1994 .

[61]  Robert. Luther,et al.  The Performance Of Ethical Unit Trusts: Choosing An Appropriate Benchmark , 1994 .

[62]  Chang‐Jin Kim,et al.  Dynamic linear models with Markov-switching , 1994 .

[63]  K. Kroner,et al.  Time-Varying Distributions and Dynamic Hedging with Foreign Currency Futures , 1993, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[64]  M. Statman,et al.  Doing Well While Doing Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds , 1993 .

[65]  John Matatko,et al.  The Investment Performance of UK “Ethical” Unit Trusts , 1992 .

[66]  R. Davies Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative , 1977 .

[67]  A. Stuart,et al.  Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments , 1959 .