Effects of electrode size and spacing on sensory modalities in the phantom thumb perception area for the forearm amputees

Tactile sensory feedback plays a key role in accomplishing the dexterous manipulation of prosthetic hands for the amputees, and the non-invasive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of the phantom finger perception (PFP) area would be an effective way to realize sensory feedback clinically. In order to realize the high-spatial-resolution tactile sensory feedback in the PFP region, we investigated the effects of electrode size and spacing on the tactile sensations for potentially optimizing the surface electrode array configuration. Six forearm-amputated subjects were recruited in the psychophysical studies. With the diameter of the circular electrode increasing from 3 mm to 12 mm, the threshold current intensity was enhanced correspondingly under different sensory modalities. The smaller electrode could potentially lead to high sensation spatial resolution. Whereas, the smaller the electrode, the less the number of sensory modalities. For an F-3 mm electrode, it is even hard for the subject to perceive any perception modalities under normal stimulating current. In addition, the two-electrode discrimination distance (TEDD) in the phantom thumb perception area decreased with electrode size decreasing in two directions of parallel or perpendicular to the forearm. No significant difference of TEDD existed along the two directions. Studies in this paper would guide the configuration optimization of the TENS electrode array for potential high spatial-resolution sensory feedback.

[1]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Gon Khang,et al.  Electrically-elicited tactile sensation for different modulation types, polarities and waveforms of stimulation pulse trains , 2012 .

[3]  Luca Citi,et al.  Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[4]  M. F. Nolan,et al.  Two-point discrimination assessment in the upper limb in young adult men and women. , 1982, Physical therapy.

[5]  M. Solomonow,et al.  Electrotactile two-point discrimination as a function of frequency, body site, laterality, and stimulation codes , 1977, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Andrew Y. J. Szeto,et al.  Relationship between pulse rate and pulse width for a constant-intensity level of electrocutaneous stimulation , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Ning Lan,et al.  Review on tactile sensory feedback of prosthetic hands for the upper-limb amputees by sensory afferent stimulation , 2014 .

[8]  Ting Wang,et al.  Perceptual attributes of cutaneous electrical stimulation to provide sensory information for prosthetic limb , 2013, 2013 IEEE Third International Conference on Information Science and Technology (ICIST).

[9]  Robert Dodson,et al.  Progressive upper limb prosthetics. , 2006, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[10]  X. H. Sui,et al.  Phantom finger perception evoked with transcutaneous electrical stimulation for sensory feedback of prosthetic hand , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[11]  Max Ortiz-Catalan,et al.  An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[12]  M. Popovic,et al.  Multi-field surface electrode for selective electrical stimulation. , 2005, Artificial organs.

[13]  Anders Björkman,et al.  Phantom digit somatotopy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in forearm amputees , 2012, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  Christian Antfolk,et al.  Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics , 2013, Expert review of medical devices.