Tracking a system of shared autonomous vehicles across the Austin, Texas network using agent-based simulation

This study provides a large-scale micro-simulation of transportation patterns in a metropolitan area when relying on a system of shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs). The six-county region of Austin, Texas is used for its land development patterns, demographics, networks, and trip tables. The agent-based MATSim toolkit allows modelers to track individual travelers and individual vehicles, with great temporal and spatial detail. MATSim’s algorithms help improve individual travel plans (by changing tour and trip start times, destinations, modes, and routes). Here, the SAV mode requests were simulated through a stochastic process for four possible fare levels: $0.50, $0.75, $1, and $1.25 per trip-mile. These fares resulted in mode splits of 50.9, 12.9, 10.5, and 9.2% of the region’s person-trips, respectively. Mode choice results show longer-distance travelers preferring SAVs to private, human-driven vehicles (HVs)—thanks to the reduced burden of SAV travel (since one does not have to drive the vehicle). For travelers whose households do not own an HV, SAVs (rather than transit, walking and biking) appear preferable for trips under 10 miles, which is the majority of those travelers’ trip-making. It may be difficult for traditional transit services and operators to survive once SAVs become available in regions like Austin, where dedicated rail lines and bus lanes are few. Simulation of SAV fleet operations suggest that higher fare rates allow for greater vehicle replacement (ranging from 5.6 to 7.7 HVs per SAV, assuming that the average SAV serves 17–20 person-trips per day); when fares rise, travel demands shift away from longer trip distances. Empty vehicle miles traveled by the fleet of SAVs ranged from 7.8 to 14.2%, across the scenarios in this study. Implications of mobility and sustainability benefits of SAVs are also discussed in the paper.

[1]  Patrick M. Bösch Required Autonomous Vehicle Fleet Sizes to Serve Different Levels of Demand , 2016 .

[2]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Valuing the Safety Benefits of Connected and Automated Vehicle Technologies , 2016 .

[3]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Modeling Carsharing with the Agent-Based Simulation MATSim: State of the Art, Applications, and Future Developments , 2017 .

[4]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Emissions and exposure costs of electric versus conventional vehicles: A case study in Texas , 2017 .

[5]  Daniel J. Fagnant,et al.  Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations , 2015 .

[6]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Evolution of the Light-Duty Vehicle Fleet , 2011 .

[7]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Fleet Sizes Required to Serve Different Levels of Demand , 2016 .

[8]  K. Kockelman,et al.  MANAGEMENT OF A SHARED , AUTONOMOUS , ELECTRIC VEHICLE FLEET : 1 IMPLICATIONS OF PRICING SCHEMES 2 3 , 2015 .

[9]  Board on Energy,et al.  Transitions to Alternative Vehicles and Fuels , 2013 .

[10]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  How does on-road fuel economy vary with vehicle cumulative mileage and daily use? , 2017 .

[11]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Location choice modeling for shopping and leisure activities with MATSim , 2009 .

[12]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Management of a Shared Autonomous Electric Vehicle Fleet: Implications of Pricing Schemes , 2016 .

[13]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  MANAGEMENT OF A SHARED, AUTONOMOUS, ELECTRIC VEHICLE FLEET: CHARGING AND PRICING STRATEGIES , 2015 .

[14]  Mikhail Chester,et al.  Life-cycle Energy and Emissions Inventories for Motorcycles, Diesel Automobiles, School Buses, Electric Buses, Chicago Rail, and New York City Rail , 2009 .

[15]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Hybrid Electric Vehicle Ownership and Fuel Economy across Texas , 2015 .

[16]  Goran Krajačić,et al.  Agent based modelling and energy planning – Utilization of MATSim for transport energy demand modelling , 2015 .

[17]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Delivering improved alerts, warnings, and control assistance using basic safety messages transmitted between connected vehicles ☆ , 2016 .

[18]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Dynamic Ride-Sharing and Optimal Fleet Sizing for a System of Shared Autonomous Vehicles , 2015 .

[19]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Operations of a Shared, Autonomous Electric Vehicle Fleet: Implications of Vehicle & Charging Infrastructure Decisions , 2016 .

[20]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Location Choice Modeling for Shopping and Leisure Activities with MATSim , 2010 .

[21]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  The Travel and Environmental Implications of Shared Autonomous Vehicles, Using Agent-Based Model Scenarios , 2014 .

[22]  Daniel J. Fagnant,et al.  PREPARING A NATION FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES: 1 OPPORTUNITIES, BARRIERS AND POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 2 CAPITALIZING ON SELF-DRIVEN VEHICLES , 2014 .

[23]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Location Choice Modeling for Shopping and Leisure Activities with MATSim , 2009 .

[24]  Tyler C. Folsom,et al.  Energy and Autonomous Urban Land Vehicles , 2012, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[25]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers , 2014 .

[26]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  The role of alternative fuel vehicles: Using behavioral and sensor data to model hierarchies in travel , 2015 .

[27]  M. Maciejewski Simulation and dynamic optimization of taxi services in MATSim , 2013 .

[28]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  The Multi-Agent Transport Simulation , 2016 .

[29]  A. Santos,et al.  Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey , 2011 .