Study on the identification of main drivers affecting the performance of human operators during low power and shutdown operation

Abstract In the past, many researchers believed that a reactor during low power and shutdown operation was sufficiently safe. This belief has been changed by the number of accidents during such types of operation, which is significantly high. Also, it was pointed out that one of the main differences between low power and shutdown operation and full power operation is the significance of human action because there are huge amounts of human actions due to extensive maintenance and testing while automatic control and safety functions may be disabled and procedures are insufficient or incomplete. This paper suggests the main drivers in performing human reliability analysis. For this study, we reviewed eight reports relating to human performance during low power and shutdown operation and applied a root cause analysis method for 53 human or human-related events at domestic nuclear power plants to derive the main drivers that affect the occurrence of those events. As a result, several main drivers were derived, such as procedures, training, experience of personnel, and workload/stress. It is expected that these main drivers will be used to perform human reliability analysis for low power and shutdown operation.

[1]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents: Part 1: Overview of the IDAC Model , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents: Part 5: Dynamic probabilistic simulation of the IDAC model , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  F. Paul Wilson,et al.  Root Cause Analysis : A Tool for Total Quality Management , 1993 .

[4]  W. Luckas,et al.  An analysis of operational experience during low power and shutdown and a plan for addressing human reliability assessment issues , 1994 .

[5]  Harold S. Blackman,et al.  INTENT: a method for estimating human error probabilities for decisionbased errors , 1992 .

[6]  R. L. Brune,et al.  Peer-review study of the draft handbook for human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear-power-plant applications, NUREG/CR-1278 , 1983 .

[7]  Ronald Laurids Boring A review of human reliability needs in the U.S. nuclear industry , 2015, 2015 Resilience Week (RWS).

[8]  Wondea Jung,et al.  A taxonomy of performance influencing factors for human reliability analysis of emergency tasks , 2003 .

[9]  A. D. Swain,et al.  Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final report , 1983 .

[10]  J.C. Williams,et al.  A data-based method for assessing and reducing human error to improve operational performance , 1988, Conference Record for 1988 IEEE Fourth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants,.

[11]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive reliability and error analysis method , 1998 .

[12]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  The development of a nuclear chemical plant human reliability management approach: HRMS and JHEDI☆ , 1997 .

[13]  Poong Hyun Seong,et al.  ADVANCED MMIS TOWARD SUBSTANTIAL REDUCTION IN HUMAN ERRORS IN NPPS , 2013 .