AbstractThe objective of this study was to characterize the polarization impedance (resistance and capacitance) of several common metal/0.9% saline interfaces operated at low-current density and to thereby provide a useful reference for those wishing to calculate the impedance of such electrodes. The series-equivalent resistance (R) and capacitive reactance (Xc) of stainless steel, platinum, silver, MP35N, palladium, aluminum, rhodium and copper electrodes, all having a surface areas S=0.005 cm2 and all in contact with 0.9% saline, were measured as a function of frequency (100 Hz to 20 kHz) at low-current density (0.025 mA/cm2). For all the metals tested, both R and Xc decreased with increasing frequency and the relationships were linear on a log-log plot. That is, R and Xc exhibited power-law behavior (R=A/fα and Xc=B/fβ). However, it was not generally true that A=B and α=β=0.5 as stated in the Warburg low-current density model. Furthermore, the Fricke constant phase model in which α=β and ϕ=0.5πβ was found not to be applicable in general. In particular, the constraint that α=β was a good approximation for most of the metals tested in this study, but the constraint that ϕ=0.5πβ did not hold in general. Although the Warburg low-current density model provides a useful conceptual tool, it is not the most accurate representation of the electrode-electrolyte interface. The Fricke constant phase model is a better representation of electrode behavior, but it also may not be valid in general. We have found that a better representation is provided by the general power-law model R=A/fα and Xc=B/fβ, where A, B, α, and β depend on the species of both the metal and electrolyte and A and B depend, in addition, on electrode area. Using this model and the data presented in this study, the impedance of an electrode-electrolyte interface operated at low-current density may be calculated as
$$Z = (0.005/S)\sqrt {(Af^{ - \alpha } )^2 + (Bf^{ - \beta } )^2 } ,$$
where S is the surface area of the electrode in cm2.
[1]
B. Onaral,et al.
Linear and nonlinear properties of platinum electrode polarisation. Part 1: frequency dependence at very low frequencies
,
1982,
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.
[2]
L. Geddes.
Electrodes and the measurement of bioelectric events
,
1972
.
[3]
E. Warburg,et al.
Ueber das Verhalten sogenannter unpolarisirbarer Elektroden gegen Wechselstrom
,
1899
.
[4]
S. E. S. E. Wakkad,et al.
The anodic oxidation of metals at very low current density. Part VI. Tin
,
1954
.
[5]
Grinnell Jones,et al.
THE MEASUREMENT OF THE CONDUCTANCE OF ELECTROLYTES. IV. THE VALIDITY OF OHM'S LAW FOR ELECTROLYTES
,
1931
.
[6]
Grinnell. Jones,et al.
The Measurement of the Conductance of Electrolytes. VII. On Platinization1
,
1935
.
[7]
Grinnell Jones,et al.
The Measurement of the Conductance of Electrolytes. VI. Galvanic Polarization by Alternating Current
,
1935
.
[8]
Banu Onaral,et al.
A Unified Approach to Represent Metal Electrode Polarization
,
1983,
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[9]
Robert Kennedy.
L. Chemical analysis of an uncommon species of zeolite
,
1803
.
[10]
L. A. Geddes,et al.
Electrical properties of metallic electrodes
,
1990,
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.
[11]
L. A. Geddes,et al.
The impedance of stainless-steel electrodes
,
1971,
Medical and biological engineering.
[12]
J. Y. Lettvin,et al.
Comments on Microelectrodes
,
1959,
Proceedings of the IRE.
[13]
J. Ross Macdonald,et al.
Impedance spectroscopy
,
2006,
Annals of Biomedical Engineering.
[14]
Herman P. Schwan,et al.
CHAPTER 6 – DETERMINATION OF BIOLOGICAL IMPEDANCES1
,
1963
.
[15]
H. Fricke,et al.
XXXIII. The theory of electrolytic polarization
,
1932
.