Learning Headway Estimation in Driving

Objective: The main purpose of the present study was to examine to what extent the ability to attain a required headway of 1 or 2 s can be improved through practical driving instruction under real traffic conditions and whether the learning is sustained after a period during which there has been no controlled training. Background: The failure of drivers to estimate headways correctly has been demonstrated in previous studies. Methods: Two methods of training were used: time based (in seconds) and distance based (in a combination of meters and car lengths). For each method, learning curves were examined for 18 participants at speeds of 50, 80, and 100 km/hr. Results: The results indicated that drivers were weak in estimating headway prior to training using both methods. The learning process was rapid for both methods and similar for all speeds; thus, after one trial with feedback, there was already a significant improvement. The learning was retained over time, for at least the 1 month examined in this study. Conclusion: Both the time and distance training of headway improved drivers' ability to attain required headways, with the learning being maintained over a retention interval. The learning process was based on perceptual cues from the driving scene and feedback from the experimenter, regardless of the formal training method. Application: The implications of these results are that all drivers should be trained in headway estimation using an objective distance measuring device, which can be installed on driver instruction vehicles.

[1]  Shih-Ken Chen Estimation of car-following safety : application to the design of intelligent cruise control , 1996 .

[2]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS DESIGN ISSUES FOR CRASH AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[3]  Leonard Evans,et al.  Risky driving related to driver and vehicle characteristics , 1983 .

[4]  John A. Groeger,et al.  ACCURACY AND SAFETY: EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT TRAINING PROCEDURES ON A TIME-TO-COINCIDENCE TASK , 1991 .

[5]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[6]  A Heino,et al.  Choice of time-headway in car-following and the role of time-to-collision information in braking. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[7]  Ronald R. Knipling,et al.  Assessment of IVHS countermeasures for collision avoidance : rear-end crashes , 1993 .

[8]  H. Ross,et al.  Optic-Flow and Cognitive Factors in Time-to-Collision Estimates , 1983, Perception.

[9]  James R. Sayer,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF LEAD-VEHICLE SIZE ON DRIVER FOLLOWING BEHAVIOR: IS IGNORANCE TRULY BLISS? , 2005 .

[10]  David Shinar,et al.  Minimum and Comfortable Driving Headways: Reality versus Perception , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[11]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[12]  David Shinar,et al.  Effects of an In-Vehicle Collision Avoidance Warning System on Short- and Long-Term Driving Performance , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Sher ry Folsom-Meek,et al.  Human Performance , 2020, Nature.

[14]  R. Toye,et al.  The effect of viewing position on the perceived layout of space , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Gjs Wilde,et al.  RISK-HOMEOSTATIC PROCESSES IN CAR-FOLLOWING BEHAVIOUR: INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN CAR-FOLLOWING AND PERCEIVED RISK , 1992 .

[17]  Hiroo Ohta INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN DRIVING DISTANCE HEADWAY , 1993 .

[18]  David Shinar,et al.  Headway Feedback Improves Intervehicular Distance: A Field Study , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[19]  M. Wagner,et al.  The metric of visual space , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Andy Shea,et al.  Traffic Safety and the Driver , 1992 .

[21]  R. Mortimer,et al.  Drivers' estimates of time to collision. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.