Tooth stiffness with composite veneers: a strain gauge and finite element evaluation.

OBJECTIVES This study was conducted to determine the impact of composite veneer procedures on the functional properties of incisors. METHODS Ten extracted human maxillary central incisors were mounted in pairs in a nylon ring. One strain gauge was bonded along the long axis of each tooth on the center of the lingual surface. Each pair formed half of a Wheatstone bridge circuit and was wired to eliminate all but the voltage resulting from experimentally applied procedures. The teeth were ramp-loaded to 50 N near the incisal edge on the lingual surface. Loading was performed on the unaltered teeth, teeth with preparations and restored teeth. Two-dimensional finite element (FE) models were generated to evaluate each test condition. Relative stiffness, compared with the unaltered tooth, was calculated from measurements with the strain gauge steps and from the FE models. RESULTS A relative stiffness value of unity represents recovery of stiffness to the level of the unaltered tooth. Both methods of evaluation demonstrated a decrease in mean relative stiffness with each subsequent reduction in tooth structure. The composite restoration increased its mean relative stiffness compared to its corresponding preparation but never to the level of the unaltered tooth. Across all procedures, the two-dimensional FE model correlated well in both direction and magnitude with the experimental strain gauge method (R = 0.83). SIGNIFICANCE A resin composite veneer does not restore the stiffness to the level of an unaltered tooth.

[1]  M Braden,et al.  Biophysics of the tooth. , 1976, Frontiers of oral physiology.

[2]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  The Impact of Composite Structure on Its Elastic Response , 1986, Journal of dental research.

[3]  E. Dill,et al.  An Introduction to the Mechanics of Solids , 1972 .

[4]  I C Howard,et al.  The Effects of Enamel Anisotropy on the Distribution of Stress in a Tooth , 1993, Journal of dental research.

[5]  H. Messer,et al.  Stiffness of Endodontically-treated Teeth Related to Restoration Technique , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[6]  A L Yettram,et al.  Finite Element Stress Analysis of the Crowns of Normal and Restored Teeth , 1976, Journal of dental research.

[7]  R DeLong,et al.  Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: modelling and analysis. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[8]  R DeLong,et al.  Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: experimental strain measurement. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[9]  W. Mccall,et al.  Functional occlusal forces: an investigation by telemetry. , 1978, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Stiffness Increase During the Setting of Dental Composite Resins , 1987, Journal of dentistry research.

[11]  R DeLong,et al.  Development of an Artificial Oral Environment for the Testing of Dental Restoratives: Bi-axial Force and Movement Control , 1983, Journal of dental research.

[12]  R DeLong,et al.  Independent movement of cusps during occlusal loading. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  H. Messer,et al.  Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. , 1989, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  A. R. Weinstein Anterior composite resins and veneers: treatment planning, preparation, and finishing. , 1988, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[15]  W. Douglas,et al.  Clinical Science Cusp Reinforcement by the Acid-etch Technique , 1984 .