How to cross boundaries in the information society: vulnerability, responsiveness, and accountability

The paper examines how the current evolution and growth of ICTs enables a greater number of individuals to communicate and interact with each other on a larger scale: this phenomenon enables people to cross the conventional boundaries set up across modernity. The presence of diverse barriers does not however disappear, and we therefore still experience cultural, political, legal and moral boundaries in the globalised Information Society. The paper suggests that the issue of boundaries is to be understood, primarily, in philosophical terms, in order to explain in what sense the fundamental historicity and situatedness of human beings does not necessarily prevent them from being able to cross the boundaries of their own experiences and to communicate with other human beings. Our line of reasoning is based on the idea that the epistemic and moral subject is neither a pure universal subject always transcending the limits of its experience nor the mere product of the context in which it find itself embedded. By virtue of its continued existence and experience of any given context, the epistemic and moral subject is asked to respond to the constraining affordances of data and to account for the moral calls of the other. This intertwinement of responsiveness and accountability towards what is "over there" confers us an original understanding of what is "here".

[1]  Ugo Pagallo,et al.  Teoria giuridica della complessità , 2006 .

[2]  Mireille Hildebrandt,et al.  Autonomic and autonomous 'thinking': preconditions for criminaI accountability , 2013, Law, Human Agency and Autonomic Computing.

[3]  Michael Naas,et al.  Adieu to Emmanuel Levinas , 1999 .

[4]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  The Method of Levels of Abstraction , 2008, Minds and Machines.

[5]  M. Durante The Value of Information as Ontological Pluralism , 2010 .

[6]  Judith Butler,et al.  Giving an Account of Oneself , 2004, diacritics.

[7]  H. Nissenbaum Accountability in a computerized society , 1997 .

[8]  Herman T. Tavani,et al.  Intercultural Information Ethics , 2008 .

[9]  K. Himma Artificial agency, consciousness, and the criteria for moral agency: what properties must an artificial agent have to be a moral agent? , 2009, Ethics and Information Technology.

[10]  M. Durante Normativity, Constructionism, and Constraining Affordances , 2011 .

[11]  S. Cavell Cities of Words: Pedagogical Letters on a Register of the Moral Life , 2004 .

[12]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  What is the Philosophy of Information , 2002 .

[13]  Adriana Cavarero,et al.  Horrorism: Naming Contemporary Violence , 2008 .

[14]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1991 .

[15]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  Information technologies and the tragedy of the Good Will , 2006, Ethics and Information Technology.

[16]  J. Halpérin,et al.  Difficile Justice Dans la Trace d'Emmanuel Lévinas : Actes du Xxxvie Colloque des Intellectuels Juifs de Langue Française , 1998 .

[17]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Understanding and Using Context , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[18]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  Governing Through Technology: Information Artefacts and Social Practice , 2010 .

[19]  Steven M. Wasserstrom Jewish Philosophy as a Guide to Life: Rosenzweig, Buber, Levinas, Wittgenstein (review) , 2010 .

[20]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  Information ethics, its nature and scope , 2006, CSOC.

[21]  M. Ceruti,et al.  Il vincolo e la possibilità , 2009 .

[22]  K. Himma The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics , 2007 .

[23]  Luciano Floridi 10. The Philosophy of Information: Ten Years Later , 2011 .

[24]  Mireille Hildebrandt,et al.  The Philosophy of Law Meets the Philosophy of Technology: Autonomic Computing and Transformations of Human Agency , 2011 .

[25]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  Governing through Technology , 2011 .

[26]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  Against digital ontology , 2009, Synthese.

[27]  Massimo Durante Il futuro del Web: etica, diritto, decentramento. Dalla sussidiarietà digitale all'economia dell'informazione in rete , 2007 .

[28]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Consequences of Information: Institutional Implications of Technological Change , 2007 .

[29]  James H. Moor,et al.  Knowledge and the Flow of Information. , 1982 .

[30]  William P. Alston,et al.  Knowledge and the Flow of Information , 1985 .

[31]  S. Cavell Conditions handsome and unhandsome : the constitution of Emersonian perfectionism , 1992 .

[32]  S. Houlgate Kant's Theory of Freedom , 1992 .

[33]  John S. McClure Adieu: To Emmanuel Levinas , 2002 .

[34]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  Information ethics, its nature and scope , 2005, CSOC.

[35]  E. Lévinas,et al.  Entre nous : on thinking-of-the-other , 1998 .

[36]  Rafael Capurro,et al.  Intercultural information ethics: foundations and applications , 2008, J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc..

[37]  H. Putnam Jewish Philosophy as a Guide to Life: Rosenzweig, Buber, Levinas, Wittgenstein , 2008 .

[38]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  A Free Irresponsible Press: Wikileaks and the Battle over the Soul of the Networked Fourth Estate , 2012 .

[39]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Consequences of Information: Institutional Implications of Technological Change , 2007 .

[40]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  On the Morality of Artificial Agents , 2004, Minds and Machines.

[41]  A. Lichtigfeld,et al.  Otherwise Than Being or Beyond Essence , 1984 .