Energy dissipation mechanism of inerter systems

Abstract Inerter systems have been proven to be effective vibration control devices. The energy-input-dissipation flow offers an alternative perspective to reveal the working mechanism of inerter-based systems for vibration control. In this study, the energy-based method is used to analytically explain the discovered benefits of inerter systems including the reduction in input energy and the enhancement of energy dissipation, which further yields optimal design for the inerter systems. Closed-form energy equations are derived for structures equipped with a basic inerter system composed of a grounded or ungrounded inerter. These energy equations theoretically establish the quantified relationship between the powers of input and dissipation and the key parameters of the inerter system in an analytical form. Furthermore, the differences in working mechanisms between inerter systems composed of grounded or ungrounded inerters are characterized via comparative analysis in terms of the displacement control, enhanced energy dissipation efficiency, and input energy reduction. Based on the revealed energy working basis, a unified energy-dissipation-based optimization strategy is developed to simultaneously control the displacement and energy responses. Finally, numerical examples are presented to validate the derived energy equations and the proposed optimization strategy. The findings of this study show that the energy equation supplies an analytical measurement for evaluating the input power of inerter-based structures and quantifies the energy dissipation effect of the inerter system. In particular, the derived energy equation explicitly reveals the dual benefits of an inerter system with a grounded inerter, which reduces the input power of the entire inerter-based structure and simultaneously dissipates the vibrational energy. Following the energy-dissipation-based optimal design strategy, which directly applies the grounded inerter to reduce input power or potentially uses the ungrounded inerter to enhance the energy dissipation effect, the target displacement can be quantitively achieved by the optimized inerter systems.

[1]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  Impact of soil–structure interaction on structures with inerter system , 2018, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[2]  Long Chen,et al.  Optimal design and experimental research of vehicle suspension based on a hydraulic electric inerter , 2019, Mechatronics.

[3]  Leonard A. Gould,et al.  Analytical design of linear feedback controls , 1957 .

[4]  Norio Inoue,et al.  A STUDY ON OPTIMUM RESPONSE CONTROL OF PASSIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS USING VISCOUS DAMPER WITH INERTIAL MASS Substituting equivalent nonlinear viscous elements for linear viscous elements in optimum control systems , 2007 .

[5]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  Optimal design based on analytical solution for storage tank with inerter isolation system , 2020 .

[6]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  Optimal design of an inerter isolation system considering the soil condition , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[7]  Sami F. Masri,et al.  Transient Response of a SDOF System With an Inerter to Nonstationary Stochastic Excitation , 2017 .

[8]  井上 豊,et al.  ボールネジを用いた制震装置の開発 : その2 制震チューブの減衰性能とその評価法 , 1999 .

[9]  Xiaoling Jin,et al.  Minimization of the beam response using inerter-based passive vibration control configurations , 2016 .

[10]  D. De Domenico,et al.  An enhanced base isolation system equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI) , 2018 .

[11]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  Comfort based floor design employing tuned inerter mass system , 2019, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[12]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Fundamental mechanism of earthquake response reduction in building structures with inertial dampers , 2012 .

[13]  Dao Gong,et al.  Online detection and control of car body low-frequency swaying in railway vehicles , 2021, Vehicle System Dynamics.

[14]  David J. Wagg,et al.  Using an inerter‐based device for structural vibration suppression , 2014 .

[15]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  Design of structure with inerter system based on stochastic response mitigation ratio , 2018 .

[16]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  A tuned liquid inerter system for vibration control , 2019 .

[17]  Luis Vela,et al.  Closed-form solutions for the optimal design of inerter-based dynamic vibration absorbers , 2018, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences.

[18]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  A particle inerter system for structural seismic response mitigation , 2019, J. Frankl. Inst..

[19]  David J. Wagg,et al.  Novel fluid inerter based tuned mass dampers for optimised structural control of base-isolated buildings , 2019, Journal of the Franklin Institute.

[20]  David J. Wagg,et al.  Design and testing of a frictionless mechanical inerter device using living-hinges , 2019, J. Frankl. Inst..

[21]  Nicholas E. Wierschem,et al.  Optimal design of rotational inertial double tuned mass dampers under random excitation , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[22]  Izuru Takewaki Building Control with Passive Dampers: Optimal Performance-based Design for Earthquakes , 2009 .

[23]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  Influence of mechanical layout of inerter systems on seismic mitigation of storage tanks , 2018, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[24]  W. D. Mark,et al.  Random Vibration in Mechanical Systems , 1963 .

[25]  Christian Málaga-Chuquitaype,et al.  Seismic protection of rocking structures with inerters , 2018, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[26]  Hongping Zhu,et al.  Vibration mitigation of stay cables using electromagnetic inertial mass dampers: Full-scale experiment and analysis , 2019 .

[27]  K. Dai,et al.  Seismic response mitigation of a wind turbine tower using a tuned parallel inerter mass system , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[28]  Anna Reggio,et al.  Optimal energy‐based seismic design of non‐conventional Tuned Mass Damper (TMD) implemented via inter‐story isolation , 2015 .

[29]  Simon A Neild,et al.  Performance‐based seismic design of tuned inerter dampers , 2019, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[30]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  Optimal design of a novel tuned mass-damper–inerter (TMDI) passive vibration control configuration for stochastically support-excited structural systems , 2014 .

[31]  Nicholas E. Wierschem,et al.  An inerter-enhanced nonlinear energy sink , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[32]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  Seismic response mitigation of structures with a friction pendulum inerter system , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[33]  N. Wierschem,et al.  Energy transfer and passive control of single-degree-of-freedom structures using a one-directional rotational inertia viscous damper , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[34]  Songtao Xue,et al.  Damping enhancement principle of inerter system , 2020, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[35]  Tian He,et al.  Parameters optimization and performance evaluation for the novel inerter-based dynamic vibration absorbers with negative stiffness , 2019 .

[36]  Kohju Ikago,et al.  Seismic control of single‐degree‐of‐freedom structure using tuned viscous mass damper , 2012 .

[37]  井上 豊,et al.  ボールネジを用いた制震装置の開発 : その1 制震チューブ・制震ディスクの性能試験 , 1999 .

[38]  Hong Hao,et al.  Mitigation of heave response of semi-submersible platform (SSP) using tuned heave plate inerter (THPI) , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[39]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  Wind-Induced Vibration Mitigation in Tall Buildings Using the Tuned Mass-Damper-Inerter , 2017 .

[40]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  Multi-objective optimal design of inerter-based vibration absorbers for earthquake protection of multi-storey building structures , 2019, J. Frankl. Inst..

[41]  Chao Pan,et al.  Displacement-Dependent Damping Inerter System for Seismic Response Control , 2019, Applied Sciences.