Translational Science: Epistemology and the Investigative Process

The term “translational science” has recently become very popular with its usage appearing to be almost exclusively related to medicine, in particular, the “translation” of biological knowledge into medical practice. Taking the perspective that translational science is somehow different than science and that sound science is grounded in an epistemology developed over millennia, it seems imperative that the meaning of translational science be carefully examined, especially how the scientific epistemology manifests itself in translational science. This paper examines epistemological issues relating mainly to modeling in translational science, with a focus on optimal operator synthesis. It goes on to discuss the implications of epistemology on the nature of collaborations conducive to the translational investigative process. The philosophical concepts are illustrated by considering intervention in gene regulatory networks.

[1]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  EPISTEMOLOGY OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY: MATHEMATICAL MODELS AND EXPERIMENTAL PREDICTION AS THE BASIS OF THEIR VALIDITY , 2006 .

[2]  M. Bittner,et al.  Wnt5a signaling directly affects cell motility and invasion of metastatic melanoma. , 2002, Cancer cell.

[3]  Sean R Eddy,et al.  What is dynamic programming? , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Introduction to Genomic Signal Processing with Control , 2006 .

[5]  F. H. Adler.  Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. , 1949 .

[6]  Blaise Hanczar,et al.  Decorrelation of the True and Estimated Classifier Errors in High-Dimensional Settings , 2007, EURASIP J. Bioinform. Syst. Biol..

[7]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Dynamics Preserving Size Reduction Mappings for Probabilistic Boolean Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[8]  Laurent El Ghaoui,et al.  Robust Control of Markov Decision Processes with Uncertain Transition Matrices , 2005, Oper. Res..

[9]  N. Wiener,et al.  The Role of Models in Science , 1945, Philosophy of Science.

[10]  A ROSENBLUETH,et al.  The mathematical formulation of the problem of conduction of impulses in a network of connected excitable elements, specifically in cardiac muscle. , 1946, Archivos del Instituto de Cardiologia de Mexico.

[11]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Effect of Function Perturbation on the Steady-State Distribution of Genetic Regulatory Networks: Optimal Structural Intervention , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Probabilistic Boolean networks: a rule-based uncertainty model for gene regulatory networks , 2002, Bioinform..

[13]  Edward R Dougherty,et al.  On the Epistemological Crisis in Genomics , 2008, Current genomics.

[14]  R. M. Hutchins.  Great Books of the Western World , 1952 .

[15]  Edward R Doughtery,et al.  Validation of computational methods in genomics. , 2007, Current genomics.

[16]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Intervention in Gene Regulatory Networks via a Stationary Mean-First-Passage-Time Control Policy , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  H. Reichenbach.  The rise of scientific philosophy , 1952 .

[18]  C.C. White,et al.  Dynamic programming and stochastic control , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Robust Intervention in Probabilistic Boolean Networks , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[20]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Cybernetics: Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. , 1949 .

[21]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series , 1964 .

[22]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Optimal infinite horizon control for probabilistic Boolean networks , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[23]  P. Kumar,et al.  Optimal adaptive controllers for unknown Markov chains , 1982 .

[24]  D. Allison,et al.  Towards sound epistemological foundations of statistical methods for high-dimensional biology , 2004, Nature Genetics.